New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I'd like to spend some time delving into what I personally think is one of the more subtle but devastating problems with our movement, especially online: religious divide.

Time and again, I shake my head in frustration when I see a right wing Christian make potential brothers into absolute others by labeling them heretics, or when a pagan or atheist does the same to a right wing Christian by calling him a christcuck. The justification for this? “Worshiping God wrong,” or perhaps worshiping God at all.

When strongly held beliefs are put aside and we look at this rationally, this is a borderline suicidal place to draw the line, given our circumstances. If you meet a fellow White man who is J pilled, racially conscious, and desires to create the ethnostate, he should become your ally on the spot. But oh wait, he's a (insert ideological label)? Pass.

There is nothing more important at present than unity and solidarity among as many Whites as possible, and this is THE thing, by far, the jew fears the most. And this subject of religion seems to be the easiest way for them to slip in and sew division from their desks in Tel Aviv. One “Christcuck,” here, a “Larpagan,” there, and boom. Just like that, two Whites now refuse to cooperate despite the fact that their real enemy is you.

Now, I'm not saying religion is not important. I'm saying it is a “later,” issue, and it is an egregious misapplication of tribalism to force it into being a “now,” issue. Absolute worst case scenario down the road (which I hope to avoid,) we can have another brother war to determine the One True Religion™, if doing so is absolutely necessary. But, only once the jews are dealt with. Because if we don't put this disagreement aside for now, the outcome is very likely that we won't be around to have that discussion at all.

It is on this basis that I put forth: anyone who uses the aforementioned rhetorical tactics for the sole purpose of being inflammatory, is either a jew or furthering jewish interests, wittingly or not. We must make every effort to come together, not drive one another apart, and this is the area where I say we have a lot of wiggle room. I understand that ConPro is not a place that is strictly relevant to real life organization, but my hope with this post is that you will take it into your own lives, in the event that you cross paths with a potential ally who might not share the same spirituality as you. And that we can encourage others to do the same.

On a final note, at risk of coming off as a hypocrite, I am not a Christian myself, and have done my share of trading blows with Christianity on this board. But, I want to make my position absolutely clear: I regard this as intellectual sport, and I don't necessarily think less of a right wing Christian for being a Christian. I am friends with a few of them, and I respect their beliefs. I simply enjoy the arena of debate, especially on the topic of spirituality, I always have. And this forum, ultimately just being social media, is a fairly appropriate place for it. In real life, I would gladly join forces with any one of you for the sake of our shared goals despite our disagreements in this matter, and I hope you would reciprocate the sentiment.

Be a White unity absolutist.
You must log in or sign up to comment
87 comments:
22
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 22 points (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror )
Based and Unitypilled. Agree 100%
deleted 1 year ago 18 points (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror ) 2 children
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
> We MUST remain solution oriented

This is it, 100%.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
>the Nazis did not have a singular religious ideology, but they functioned very well

On the contrary, the most Christian zones of Germany were the least supportive of the Reich, and produced the most enemy collaborators. "Nation as religion" was the belief of the most devoted NatSocs.
13
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
Christianity literally tells us its a punishment to be a multicultural society. It tells us that God divided us by Nation. Its nuts to me that any White Christian does not realize these truths
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
talked with a few older people yesterday. they were very in on pacifist theology. can't wait for their generations to die off
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Pacifist. Jesus was not even a Pacifist. I am always blown away that people believe you can Love something while not Hating anything
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
WhatWouldMountainDew on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Do you know what pacifists didn't do? Pick up a rifle for Uncle Sam to kill White men half way around the world.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Enygger_Tzu on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
No more brother wars!
deleted 1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
BreadandWinePilled on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
The War of the Protestant League (aka the Thirty Years' War) was **NOT** nonsense. Catholic heresy has always been the third-greatest threat to the future of the European peoples, right behind Islam and (most of all) Judaism. The continual willingness of innumerable Popes (the supposed "holy and infallible voice of God on earth" by the way) to salivate over any opportunity to kill/maim/hang/burn at the stake any and all who refuse to swallow the Catholic Church's open corruption and blasphemy (not just Protestants) obviates any willingness I might otherwise have to let bygones be bygones.

Now, all that being said, I do agree that until every last Jew and Moslem is removed from this mortal plane, we have much bigger priorities than denominational disputes. This is fine, and I believe Hitler/the NSDAP had the right idea about refusing to favor any specific denomination in the Party creed. To the extent that Catholics are willing to take up the sword against our mortal enemies the Jews, I will tolerate them. Beyond that? Never.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Well you're never going to win, but I do admire your tenacity.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 3 children
I love this ideal, and I hear the sentiment at least 80% of the time from NON-Christians.

In practice, Christians will always have a higher priority than their nation, as well as Biblical stand-down orders when it comes to political violence.

Without cherrypicking efforts, Christianity is clearly in favor of "one race the human race", and accordingly, missionaries have been miscegenating for centuries. It's not a strong racial philosophy.

Then add the fact that Christians put more money into immigration efforts than jews do... is this really compatible with prolonged sustenance of the White race?

The jews demonstrate that unity within the ingroup is more important than unanimity among the whole group. A 2% minority can seize power through extraordinary unity. So, are we really better off including Christians who split their loyalty between "salvation" and race?
Enygger_Tzu on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
And here is RabbiSweyn try to sow division once more.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I'm inclined to agree that Christianity itself is significantly more pro globohomo than it is pro nationalism, though there are elements of both in the bible depending on where you look and how you choose to interpret it. However, I disagree that this describes all Christians.

99% of all Christians in the general world may be slobbing on circumcised knob, but in these spaces, there are a decent amount who have carved out a truly based version of the religion for themselves. Even if it isn't always as explicit as something like CI, they make sure their theology does allow for them to put nation first, and permit violence, willfully shutting out any biblical elements that may condemn that.

These are the ones I want to join forces with. Because if they are openly race first, and willing to fight and kill for it, that's all that's needed. If that's where they're at, I have no cause to convince them that whatever reasoning got them to that point is actually wrong. Doing so would be counterproductive if not outright self sabotaging. Furthermore, the Christians who do *not* put nation first, and would rather live in a multicultural Christian society than among ideologically diverse brothers, almost always out themselves right away. A couple have done so in this thread already.

And I believe trying to join forces with them is not only worthwhile, but necessary. The reality is most likely that well over 50% of right wing individuals will identify as some sort of Christian, and I suspect that is a conservative estimate. That amount of White people is too massive to allow it to remain at odds with the remaining portion. We must work to bridge the divide among every single White person who wholeheartedly believes in *nation first,* and let bygones be bygones with whatever they believe otherwise.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Aye, forming a united front like our enemies do is crucial, OFC we can’t go too far less we cuck like the Falange.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Aye, while having Christians as allies is good, Christian nationalism would suck for this reason, and I’d MUCH rather have a race first party like the NSDAP.
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
>If you meet a fellow White man who is J pilled, racially conscious, and desires to create the ethnostate, he should become your ally on the spot. But oh wait, he's a (insert ideological label)? Pass

i don't think that ever happened in this board, sure you have people who argue and bicker but most of our users are **pro White at heart**, and that's the thing that ACTUALLY matters.

though i've seen more than a few instances where the supposed "Christians" cuck for niggers, [even from users i respect](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1994kICa0Z/the-n-problem/c/4ZDuNLH3XuA?d=50)

so i understand the pagan position, but as you said, it could be kikes larping as both and facilitating the disharmony you speak of which divides people and thus, spills doubt into the minds of the readers

i also noticed an increase in (((suspicious))) accounts attacking people *who actually name the jew IRL*, be it HT, Brother Nathanial or the recent Armenian chad who named them publicly

these snakes spit poison and doubt until you're stupid and confused, don't mind them, call them out & call them kikes, because that's what they are.



Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 4 children
"Don't use it as a divisive issue"

"Muh IntELlEcTuAl sPoRt/ tOPic Of deBaTe"

choose one
deleted 1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Well I tried to articulate my justification for the separation. Arguing about nuanced topics is a legitimate pastime (within reason,) especially on the internet. I can have an investment in that without using it to be explicitly divisive, which is why I take care to not resort to the usual name-calling, and to be generally respectful in my wording to opponents regardless of the severity of disagreement. Perhaps there are instances where fail to do so when passion gets the better of me, which is part of the reason I made this post: to make it clear that despite these moments, there is a 9/10 chance that I consider you friend and not foe if you're here, regardless of what you believe on these matters.

Were I to meet any of the ConPro Christians in real life, no longer in the digital realm, I would make zero attempt at any point to try to convince them their religion is wrong. I would agree to disagree on that, if it even came up, and instead seek to foster kinship where we *do* agree, which is of so much more relevance.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It was a good post, although from your reply comment here I would assume that the ambiguity in your last paragraph about debate means something other than what I read it to mean.

you should consider deleting that paragraph since it only serves to detract from your initial message and delivery
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
no the first half of it's very good, the part where he then countermands himself and says debate is fine also is just a wedge in the door to let disharmony in

as long as you're white and you are conscious of the jews and their multi-millennial history of theft and usurpation and genocide and slavery and you are against it, I don't give a shit what you believe outside of that, we are friends, And I'm not going to debate the finer points of religion with you.

I honestly don't even care if your experience with organized religion has led you to be an atheist, my personal experience caused me to be agnostic for almost 20 years. I have found my way back now but I can understand others believing almost anything as long as they believe that the jews are the enemy
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I enjoy a civil discussion, but those aren't common as obviously religion is a very emotional and personal thing.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
What he means is civil religious discussion (weather between religions or branches) is interesting, As long as it's civil and not insult flinging.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Aye we WNs are ultimately brothers, No matter what faith or lack there in we hold, There’s already not enough of us as is (As for me, I’m not sure atm, Agnostic but quite interested in Von List’s Volkism, as it makes sense to me).
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
Evangelicals that worship jews are 100% heretics. By default, they are others and are opposed to us.


When Catholics argue that they are the only true church, I laugh. This is because the Pope can assume that he is infallible or is Jesus. Man made God. This arrogance was the reason for the Protestant schism centuries ago. Don't even get started with the concept of saints. Spirits that carry your prayers to God? The Bible says to not speak to spirits and talk directly to God instead.


Many of the Protestant sects are now anti Christ. This doesn't prove the Catholics correct, it just means they were weak. Look at any church that allows women pastors. Soon after they will welcome in faggots.


The Orthodox church is unchanged. Big argument with the Catholic church, but they have not changed much in over a thousand years. Where as the Catholic church has.


Let's throw in the Mormon temple. It's temple, not church. First off they believe the cross is a graven image. Their temples come to a point rather than a cross at the top of a steeple. They study the Bible but then study their cultish books from a charlatan from the mid West or East coast, I do forget where he was from. He took advantage of peoples' good nature during the revival period and lead them astray, like any cult leader, he then started marrying many of his flocks' daughters. Like any cult, he just wanted to fuck young women and his followers threw them at him.


If you want to prevent infighting, I would say that people should stop saying that they are the true church. Even more important is that these distinctions don't even mean anything when confronted with a foreigner. A foreigner has come to your shores to destroy your people and your god, do you care now what form they choose to serve your god? No, it only matters that the foreigner is destroyed.


Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
use deadly force to the maximum when destroying foreigners who are ethnically replacing you
brain_fuckler on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Evangelicals have the plastic junk version of Christianity. The kind that mimics something beautiful but is in reality an injection molded piece of recycled trash with no purpose other than to be used and thrown away.
BreadandWinePilled on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
Counterpoint to this rambling atheist drivel:

> Atheism is the only worldview or religion that is not tolerated within the SS... I have not tolerated an atheist in the ranks of the SS. Every member has a deep faith in God, in what my ancestors called in their language *Waralda*, the Ancient One, the One who is mightier than we are.

- Heinrich Himmler
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
? I am not an atheist, though my sentiment does extend to atheists who are serious about this and willing to put aside differences (though they are a rare breed in my experience.)

It must be borne in mind that we are not necessarily out to recreate the SS down to the exact detail here. Times have changed since then, most relevantly with regards to demographics. The National Socialists still had a homogenous country at their disposal, so they could select for certain beliefs to an extent. We are in a multicultural hellscape with our numbers plummeting at an alarming rate. We can't afford to get hung up on small potatoes.
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
if you are not atheist, what are you
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I consider myself a perennialist. I believe in God, pray daily, and seek to purge my life of evils and align it with God's will as much as I am able. If it weren't for his unfathomable mercy in deigning to touch my life, I would not be here today.

But I don't believe in organized religion as anything that has spiritual authority, and participation in it has never suited me. Ultimately, I believe religion and myth are the necessary means by which mortals perceive the imperceivable God, who is beyond our understanding.

The only things that matter are fruits, and the disposition of one's heart. If a sentient, soul-imbued human has a proper understanding of Good and Evil, and genuinely dedicates their life to strive for heaven in service of Good, to "take up their cross," as a Christian might say, then they are a true follower of God. Even if the myth by which God is visible to them differs from the myth of a different person with a different life experience, who is walking the same narrow path.

I follow extremely minimalist, but strongly held spiritual principles in my walk. For others it can surely be different, but my experience was that the end of trying to force God into a neat little box by putting so much emphasis on intricate, amoral dogmas such as The Trinity, Monergism vs. Synergism etc, was madness. Only when I let that all go and surrendered myself to utter Mystery did I finally find peace.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Himmler also wasn’t a Christian lol
Fudgiethewhale on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
As long as you believe is Jesus Christ as the only savior (correct soteriology) and have a correct view of the Trinity, you’re good in my book
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
>a correct view of the trinity

Does the Holy Spirit proceed from the Father *and* the Son, or just the Father?

Because the fucking Great Schism happened because people couldn’t agree on that. It’s the sole reason. You want to reunite Christendom, you have to fix that.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
A good friend of mine is an Orthobro, and I've talked with him at length about this topic. He basically said that the schism wasn't so much a result of the churches in the East disagreeing with the Filioque per se, but really just because the churches in the West told them "this is how its going to be whether you like it or not". To be fair, it was in direct response to an extremely popular heresy of the time and time was of the essence, but I definitely understand where the churches in the East were coming from. I'd hate being told that too.
deleted 1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
This is my requirement for communion with anyone: they must believe all words spoken by Jesus Christ in the main cannon to be right and true.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
>communion

Does that imply a context of religious fellowship? If so, all well and good. But if this is a precursor to working pragmatically with other nationalists to achieve political goals, then that is a stance I urge you to reconsider. Because if that's the bottom line, that literally makes you allies with niggers in Africa more than it does White people.
Captain_Raamsley on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Niggers aren't sapient and therefore cannot actually believe anything.
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
based
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
christianity tells me that i should not seek alliance with idolaters and pagans. not interested in what you're on about. i am not tolerant towards almost dead religions. and to be quite fair with you, i dont think i'll ever see ones like you if i do see them that would be this reasonable even if i wasn't this intolerant. they are unreasonable and usually throw the first stone, so i am simply responding.

however if one appears in the movement and never speaks about it not even once, how would we even know? but the moment you make it an issue, that's when it gets concerning.

i would be more willing to work with other christians though
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
My view is simple, all all White non-subversive religions should be tolerated with none as the state’s chosen, also solves denominational infighting
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
I’m upvoting this. This is the way.
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
I dont fixate on religion that much but i wont stop calling out retarded denomination practices including my own (Orthodoxy).

Any person that takes his denomination seriously is an idiot.

Denominations are just random human interpretations of the Bible.

They shouldnt even exist, everything you need to know is in the Bible already, in fact, everything you need to know is in the Gospels
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Tap_isarealboy on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
How is it that in a post that calls for unity some of you go full retard to shit all over Catholics? Get over yourselves and your imagined grievances that didn't even happen to you. That is nigger behavior.

The unity I see to be fully unifying is a secular one. Some type of organization that operates as a focal point for the interests of their members.

Over in the Christian forum I was mentioning a desire to start a guild for contractors or tradesmen or both. These guilds can be part of larger group that forms a network.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Problem with Caths is the religion follows an external living person (IE not one of us or in our nation), this caused plenty of issues for the Reich. The current Pope is kissing nigger feet and praising Klaus Schwab.
Tap_isarealboy on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
This is exactly my point. On a post requesting unity it is chalk full of division.

The problem with Catholics, the problem with EO, the problem with Prots, the problem with non-denominationals, or Mormons, or whatever is your personal problem.

That's what it boils down to. You personally have a problem so you wanna just air those grievances because why not make it all about you. That's half of the commenters in this post.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
For what it's worth I agree with your idea, I'm just worried mainly about loyalty to an external person who isn't one of us, should make sense, Pagan and Protestant faiths lack this issue, Orthodox ones seem to be less bad with this issue though they've still had issues in the past.
Tap_isarealboy on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
As the OP had originally stated. These religious problems can be dealt with after the unity. There were prots and Catholics in Germany. They still unified.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I am an atheist and religion is of low relevance to me. What matters to me is truth, and with that racial consciousness, and with that the will to seek ethnic homogeneity.

As such all beliefs, religious or not, can be detrimental to that goal. Or what is there that seeks to remove all kikes or niggers in your country? Christianity? At best some radical, unpopular interpretation that continually has to swim against the stream. Atheism? It is manifested as Marxism/neo-Marxism, and that's fundamentally jewish and seeks to destroy you. Or it believes in some version of "equality", which naturally is bad (and also a lie). Or some scientific belief set? Good luck dodging all the bullets of corruption (but if you do, it's good).

So what matters is the belief that truth is of highest importance. I believe that truth will set you free. At some point truth will turn into action.

And it is simple. Just say what is correct. Bring information to those who are resistant to it. There is no belief involved, no superstition, no hope, no schemes, no pursuit of power, no personal interest. All you have to do is to figure out how to do it best.

The pursuit of truth has lead me here. Not the pursuit of any ideology or belief system. I consider myself a true non-believer of anything, which goes beyond atheists (who still believe in non-religious concepts like "equality", "karma" or have some consumerist mindset). I just seek to understand patterns.
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
you say you are an atheist

>atheism is manifested as neo-marxism

what
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
What's your point?
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
isn't it contradictory to be on conpro and be atheist
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
No. We are talking about tendencies, not absolutes. It's not like ALL atheists had a meeting and decided to unite with the jews to come up with communism, kill the czar of Russia and have millions of Christians be raped, massacred and persecuted.

The ideology or belief system that emerges from atheism is communism. Imagine the combination of ignorance, having the media and institutions cheer you on, and no religious belief system - that's the prime recipe to become a communist.

Being a jew is of course another, but what drives the jew to communism is irrelevant. Be it their religion or their metropolitan, globalist, hedonistic, cosmopolitan, degenerate nature. That jews lean towards communism is natural to them.

As of me, I am devoid of all beliefs. I don't believe in the concept of "equality" because it goes against reality. For me only truth matters, aka what is objectively correct, and that doesn't mean I am delusional about the benefits of lies. To lie, aka be hospitable or avoid confrontation, has its benefits. Even to do fraud is financially beneficial. So it's not a belief. I am convinced that the increased expression of truth on the scale of society will lead to our racial homogeneity and to a better world. Truth will set us free.

I adhere to ethics because I want to. It's really basic philosophy, and individual/collective reciprocity is what matters most. Call it ego or pride. That said I am not averse to the idea of disposing of subhumans. I hate niggers, I hate kikes, I hate faggots. No ideology or religion obscures that notion. I don't have to prove myself to God, and I do not have to indulge in some kike-invoked empathy.

But there is no guideline to my system of views. So I don't recommend it. I wouldn't even try to categorize it.
Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
i wouldnt go down the path of apostasy if i were you
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Unity is the one transcendental I think we can all get behind. Instead of making enemies of our White brothers for the sake of internet bloodsport, we should be putting our heads together and creating strategies to fight off the real (((enemy))).
iideathyii on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
It is mostly jews who bash pagens and christ pretending to be white ppl on forums lime 4chan.
derkevevin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's not just a religious issue. There are too many purists who can't make ideological or political compromises in order to work together, even though the main goal, the survival of our people, is the same.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Part of why I think is we’ve got no real leader at the moment, I think once push comes to shove it’ll be a hell of a lot easier
Byzantine_Shill on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I have no issues working with non-Catholics on a shared goal as long as it doesn’t involve the rejection of Catholic teachings. This forum doesn’t require me to sign a contract forcing me to aknowledge that sodomy is OK or laughs during a prayer and make fun of divine works on national television.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Indeed, I advocate for "agree to disagree" for now on these matters. Though not a Catholic myself, I would respect your decision to be one and we could work together, provided we agree on *enough* of the essential issues.
brain_fuckler on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
I'm not going to ally with people who only want to simply be the regime that takes the reigns when the jews are deposed. muslims will stab you in the back and want to rape our children just as much as the kikes. They're genetic equals. The muslims are just not in a position of power.
If the belief system comes from a place of White European heritage I'll be happy to have them as long as they don't work against us. Paganism and other European pre-Roman woo is harmless and attempts to preserve the roots of our spoken folk heritage. I juxtapose these two groups because one is currently being kicked around as "based allies" by retards like Nick Fuentes while the other is sidelined by association with FUD shills. Allying with browns is suicide.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I'm uncertain if you are reading support of this sentiment into my post somehow, but I am absolutely opposed to any full fledged allegiance of any sort with sandniggers.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yeah Nick whines about killing le heckin’ Pagans but tolerates scum like Sneako.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
> “Worshiping God wrong,” or perhaps worshiping God at all.

These churches are retarded and gay. You can ignore them. In a few years no one will remember they even existed. Maybe they will be a footnote in the history books, maybe not. It doesn't matter. They are pointless and are literally falling apart before your eyes.

> If you meet a fellow White man who is J pilled, racially conscious, and desires to create the ethnostate, he should become your ally on the spot. But oh wait, he's a (insert ideological label)? Pass.

Can you name the sects that actually believe this? I can. I'm sorry, I used the plural when I meant singular.

Satan wants to divide us. Only one church I know of isn't falling victim to this.

> Now, I'm not saying religion is not important. I'm saying it is a “later,” issue, and it is an egregious misapplication of tribalism to force it into being a “now,” issue.

You are wrong here.

Religion is literally everything.

If you don't start with a belief in God, and a belief of our duties to God, etc... then you literally have nothing.

Atheists will never defend the white race. Only a particular kind of Christian will.

The truth is we need to expunge the idiots and embrace pure doctrine.

How do you do it? It's very easy, really. Jesus said "By their fruits ye shall know them."

Go look up the church(es) that are rapidly growing, marrying and staying married, and having a lot of kids. Go look up the churches that aren't losing all of their youth to atheists. Go look up the churches that aren't pacifist or unprepared for disasters.

The answer is staring you right in the face, but for the fact that some people get butthurt that God is actually speaking and leading his people in these latter days.
Sneak_King on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Not to mention that multiculturalism is a punishment from God for sinful behavior.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I’m an agnostic and I’m pro-White (though Volkism is something I need to look into as it makes sense to me(, and we’ve plenty of other various sorts in our ranks too (Paganism and I don’t mean the bastardized libshit larp, is a literal religion of the blood) , an enemy is obviously regardless of religious creed same for a fren
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 3 children
OK, so when the pagan starts race mixing and thinking faggotry is fine, I'll just put my differences aside, and when the judeo-tard starts saying all the races are saved and thinks God made all the races, then I'll also put my differences aside, because at least they're racially aware.

Coronelington on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
i'm glad i'm not the only one refusing this guy who wants 'religious cooperation'
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I fail to see a point to this comment beyond empty demoralization.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Libshit Pagans sadly exist (though they’re tards who lack understanding of the religion and simply wear it as an aesthetic) and so do a variety of based Christians. I’m of the view that we could ally, after all one of us regardless of faith is closer to another in views then our dregs.
ObsidianSword on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
tl;dr People don't read and that's a major problem

I used to think Christianity was fundamentally a harmless peace loving hippy religion, but when I finally skimmed through the bible, I realized it was (and still is) essentially a Judaism for cattle with lots of self contradictions, and there is absolutely nothing special about the moral codes it provides.

I know mentally/physically wounded people tend to seek for a quick fix, and religion provides a *solution* exactly like that ("just pray", "say christ is king!"), but I just hope they actually read the scripture and compare them to Greek/Chinese philosophers or other non-Abrahamic religious scriptures like Dhammapada.

They'll realize something is OFF.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
My personal opinion is that you are spot on with this assessment. The oft repeated "Judaism for gentiles," is the most accurate summation of it I've encountered after being in the religion for many years, and after studying the Bible and forming my own conclusion of its content.

That being said, right wing Christians don't believe this of themselves. They genuinely see Jesus as some Aryan deity, or at least White-adjacent, and wash away the semitic moral elements in some form of apologia. And my belief is that once you create a crystalline image of God out of something, and believe in it wholeheartedly, then it becomes real, regardless of how little it may bear in common with the clay from which you crafted it by that point.

Once someone's spiritual mythos is set in stone, there is no separating him from it, and it is fruitless to try. In fact, it may be detrimental to the man. I would rather join forces with him if it has led him to the same hatred of evil that I possess, regardless of how I appraise his reasons.
TerrorAndSlaughter on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I am a Christian. When one of my kids gets a date, my second question isn't what their religion is, but to establish that they aren't radical Progressives. Progressivism is the real enemy in my eyes and poisonous wherever they can spread their maladaptive rot. Progressivism has utilitarian, Puritan, and Jewish roots. It wears Christianity as a skin suit just as well as without. But hopefully most of my kids marry well and give me lots of white grandchildren and no one can break me family up with poison ideology.
  
Building a strong family, into a strong bund, and a strong community is what we should all be focusing on. That is the normal, organic human experience we were made for and what makes us happy. I think Christianity properly understood extends and perfects that natural understanding of life. Ideology is idolatry that focuses on one part at the cost of the whole. Eventually it gets to where it undermines the foundation of family and everything goes to shit.
caravanofdeath on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The problem is really that many Christians (perhaps a majority?) put their faith above race, especially in America. And whenever this point is brought up it just results in sperging out about pagan larpers and calling people Nazis (like it's an insult). Race, blood, ethnos... is of far more importance than religion, economic theory, or fake political football teams.

This is a massive glaring weakspot of the political right in America. I see a tiny shred of hope in certain figures but I really don't know if Americans are capable of recapturing the spirit of White nationalism since they have no common ethnos. For this reason I see the best option for America to be balkanisation into ethnic communities.

deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The simplest way I would describe it is just Pro-White. It is probably most popularly overlaps with the ideology of National Socialism, the political system of Germany under Hitler. As for me, and many others, it boils down to this:

If it is beneficial to White people, my people, I support it. If it is detrimental to White people, I oppose it. Furthermore, White Europeans are entitled to an ethnically homogenous homeland to call their own, free of foreign influence.
WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The wider WN/NS movement
Toast message