Telling people to refuse the draft is illegal
(files.catbox.moe)
Die for the ZOG, goy, it's your patriotic duty!
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
9 comments:
14
1 year ago
14 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+14Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Weird.
It's almost like they want us to take up arms and fight.
Fight the enemies of our people that is.
It's almost like they want us to take up arms and fight.
Fight the enemies of our people that is.
Fight the enemies of Israel, you mean.
I thought that I KNEW EVERY FEDERAL SUPPORTED LAW RESTRICTING US speech, and this one was unknown to even me!
WTF!
> United States free speech exceptions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions
All scholars omit that in that well edited page on (((Wikipedia)))!
If its not on kikepedia, I think 25% chance OP image is an LLM AI chat bot error hallucination, unless it in penal code US 18 2388 in current text:
> Whoever, when the United States **is at war**, willfully causes or **attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty**, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—
> Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
So, no. This OP meme is not true unless the US Constitution is "on hold" due to US Congress voting to enter a state of War.
Not true, but the LLM chat bot is correct during legal war. Vietnam was NEVER a US War, no vote. Vietnam was a mere "Police Action".
But of all people on this server, I and u/TallestSkil are probably the two most intrigued people at residual laws on the books from WW1 and WW2, such as this.
During Vietnam years SCOTUS smashed dozens of old abridgments to the first amendment, and I guess this one slipped by, due to fact that Vietnam was not a real War under law, so moot issue.
But I thought I fucking knew nearly everything, but all here would be astounded at things allowed DURING FORMAL WAR or CIVIL WAR. Its like Soviet Russia level shit what the Executive branch can do.
It's a good thing the last War WE DECLARED was WW2 (June 5, 1942 US declared WAR on Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria), but we are allowed to respond if others declare war on USA first, like Iraq did formally that December, so long ago.
I think using large language models of A.I. to interpret law like this can be fascinating. For fun, **I used to read EVERY PAGE of the Penal Code (not civil !) of certain large states like California, and carry paperback in my coat**, to back up FUN FACTS at cocktail parties.... two felonies I showed to win arguments from the paperback book in my coat:
- "mexican door bells illegal" : A person picking up a passenger cannot misuse car horn , by using it from driveway, instead of walking up to door or calling on phone. PENAL CODE VIOLATION
- "butyric acid in a syringe illegal" : ECO-WARRIORS and Commies were sticking syringe needles into fancy car rubber door window edge and destroying car interiors with a mere ounce of butyric acid. The law was very very specific. PENAL CODE VIOLATION.
- etc, etc so many weird CA felonies for White suspects
WTF!
> United States free speech exceptions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions
All scholars omit that in that well edited page on (((Wikipedia)))!
If its not on kikepedia, I think 25% chance OP image is an LLM AI chat bot error hallucination, unless it in penal code US 18 2388 in current text:
> Whoever, when the United States **is at war**, willfully causes or **attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty**, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—
> Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
So, no. This OP meme is not true unless the US Constitution is "on hold" due to US Congress voting to enter a state of War.
Not true, but the LLM chat bot is correct during legal war. Vietnam was NEVER a US War, no vote. Vietnam was a mere "Police Action".
But of all people on this server, I and u/TallestSkil are probably the two most intrigued people at residual laws on the books from WW1 and WW2, such as this.
During Vietnam years SCOTUS smashed dozens of old abridgments to the first amendment, and I guess this one slipped by, due to fact that Vietnam was not a real War under law, so moot issue.
But I thought I fucking knew nearly everything, but all here would be astounded at things allowed DURING FORMAL WAR or CIVIL WAR. Its like Soviet Russia level shit what the Executive branch can do.
It's a good thing the last War WE DECLARED was WW2 (June 5, 1942 US declared WAR on Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria), but we are allowed to respond if others declare war on USA first, like Iraq did formally that December, so long ago.
I think using large language models of A.I. to interpret law like this can be fascinating. For fun, **I used to read EVERY PAGE of the Penal Code (not civil !) of certain large states like California, and carry paperback in my coat**, to back up FUN FACTS at cocktail parties.... two felonies I showed to win arguments from the paperback book in my coat:
- "mexican door bells illegal" : A person picking up a passenger cannot misuse car horn , by using it from driveway, instead of walking up to door or calling on phone. PENAL CODE VIOLATION
- "butyric acid in a syringe illegal" : ECO-WARRIORS and Commies were sticking syringe needles into fancy car rubber door window edge and destroying car interiors with a mere ounce of butyric acid. The law was very very specific. PENAL CODE VIOLATION.
- etc, etc so many weird CA felonies for White suspects
Toast message