What kind of a person makes a post about their own post? The kind of person that likes the smell of their own farts.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
20 comments:
nope.
It has wisdom.
debunk it otherwise.
It has wisdom.
debunk it otherwise.
You already debunked it yourself by using the word "should". As soon as someone says something "should" happen, you've abandoned reality and taken it into the theoretical abstract. ie. That supermodel "should" be sucking my dick. In other words you made shit up about what you think "should" happen instead of looking at reality. Women and leftists do that too. It's called solipsism. Look it up.
nah, that's not how it works. one of the problem of the world is that people are too kind and don't bother to call out the degenerates.
Wait too few people say the fact for the facts: Klaws Schwab should be hanged, the kikes should be kicked, the repegees should be deported.
And if enough people group, it's easy and doable. But they don't cuz they're idiots.
reality is reality, nobody denies it.
Wait too few people say the fact for the facts: Klaws Schwab should be hanged, the kikes should be kicked, the repegees should be deported.
And if enough people group, it's easy and doable. But they don't cuz they're idiots.
reality is reality, nobody denies it.
The beneficial symbiotic effect you're describing occurred when women had less rights.
what I'm saying is that all these rights that women have are artificial.
the very idea of women needing rights to begin with is jewish. there wasn't anything with the model that whites used to have. Probably the notion of a right didn't even exist.. why would it.
then the kikes came and brainwashed them that they're held hostage by their husband and patriarchy (no shit that men are going to rule society, it's always has been this way), and made them push for rights...
women don't need more or less rights.. they need to go back to be women.. to wear dressess , to respect and support men.
as that quote says, behind every man there is an even stronger women.. there is truth in this.
the very idea of women needing rights to begin with is jewish. there wasn't anything with the model that whites used to have. Probably the notion of a right didn't even exist.. why would it.
then the kikes came and brainwashed them that they're held hostage by their husband and patriarchy (no shit that men are going to rule society, it's always has been this way), and made them push for rights...
women don't need more or less rights.. they need to go back to be women.. to wear dressess , to respect and support men.
as that quote says, behind every man there is an even stronger women.. there is truth in this.
Spartan women would put down slave rebellions while the men were off fighting wars. There is obviously truth to that.
>they need to go back to be women.. to wear dressess , to respect and support men
They wouldn't need to go back to a prior state of being had they not been given the false notion of "equal rights" by jews. As you stated.
Legislating equal rights was always a bad idea. That's why historically, the world over, women were denied them for so long. And in some sane places, still are.
>as that quote says, behind every man there is an even stronger women..
That's not how the [quote](https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/behind-every-great-man-theres-a-great-woman.html) goes.
It's.. *Behind every great man, there's a great woman.*
It's also feminist propaganda.
I prefer the Mark Twain version anyhow.. *Behind every successful man, there is a woman – And behind every unsuccessful man, there are two.*
They wouldn't need to go back to a prior state of being had they not been given the false notion of "equal rights" by jews. As you stated.
Legislating equal rights was always a bad idea. That's why historically, the world over, women were denied them for so long. And in some sane places, still are.
>as that quote says, behind every man there is an even stronger women..
That's not how the [quote](https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/behind-every-great-man-theres-a-great-woman.html) goes.
It's.. *Behind every great man, there's a great woman.*
It's also feminist propaganda.
I prefer the Mark Twain version anyhow.. *Behind every successful man, there is a woman – And behind every unsuccessful man, there are two.*
Toast message
Men are inventors and revolutionaries, women are responsible for upholding the societal norm and teaching it to the next generation. Of course there are exceptions to both, but usually "change" overall was carried out by men. The role of a mother is invaluable as is the role of a father and the lack of a feminine and masculine figure in life, and society as a whole, is a massive detriment overall. Think of the doting mother making sure that you're safe and well fed and then the dad who you do cool shit with that you "don't tell mom about", now apply this to society as a whole.
What's the issue? In the past (as in 100 to 50 years ago, not to the tune of the distant past), the "revolution" was vile and degenerate, and this was overall spread more by men than women, until a precipice around the roe v wade vote where it had started to become the norm that women were upholding about equally to men and are now upholding more. This *became* the societal norm. What are women doing now? Their biological function. As always. There's nothing inherently wrong with it, the issue is what is viewed as "normal" in society.
We all have a share in the blame for what has happened (no, liberal white women didn't "destroy" the west, yids already did this before any woman was even liberal at all). But who is the puppetmaster? Jewry. Make no mistake. It's not white women or men who thought this up, or convinced people to do this, it was jewry, and jewry managed to convince them to do the work for jews. The "liberal white woman = le bad and destroyed the west" is a jewish, miga-tier take, but the people saying it may not even realize is a jewish take. Half the time it's followed by "marry an Asian/beaner woman they're so trad and based" or "be a lonely incel who hates life and will never have children".
One thing worth noticing is that , the majority of men here would assume that it's men leading women, but sexually, it's women leading men. They had to target women to turn them against men, and they did it perfectly.
Because it is women who control men's sexual energy, all they had to do was to undress them a bit , to make them show their body and that was all. Hence the word 'sexy' , that in factuality, it is 'lustful' and lust is a sin. women should be lustful only towards their man obviously.
But there is a lot to say, TV programming, even for kids, teaching the young girls to be spoiled princessess, all the disney movies are about this..
However wha I lined there with the hyperlink is true, if women work together with men they create life. Certain masters in Asia say that women men and women join together in the act, they are a God, as they're creating life, and only God can create life. - but everything about the sacred sex is perverted, twisted, it's unreal what times we live in..
Hopefully God can reset things to default.. what is created now is just death.
As long as a message is put out, it's completely good in my book. But this is the internet, and people on the internet like to nitpick shit