1 year ago14 points(+0/-0/+14Score on mirror)4 children
Amusingly the female support for Suffrage is a complete myth, there were woman's groups created to oppose it because it was popular to be against it back then. When (((the press))) began astroturfing support for it, a lot of weak willed women and cucked men fell in line and supported it.
>I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights," with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were women to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen, and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.
>In an 1870 letter, quoted for example in All For Love: Seven Centuries of Illicit Liaison by Val Horsler (2006), p. 104. At the bottom of this page, it is mentioned that the comment was written in a letter to Sir Theodore Martin in reaction to news "that Viscountess Amberley had become president of the Bristol and West of England Women's Suffrage Society and had addressed a ... public meeting on the subject." The author of the page, Helena Wojtczak, says here that while other sources often fail to give the context, she "researched and discovered the source of the quote".
>Were women to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen, and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.
A lot of women also opposed sufferage because they thought being given men's rights would also mean being given men's responsibilities, which were often difficult and dangerous.
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)1 child
We could have said "no" to a lot of things. Bringing blacks over from African to pick cotton, anything immigration post 1920's, fighting the Germans, carving out the state of Israel, joining any global-homo organization, etc
Their criteria to vote: does it have a liberal vagina?
Oh also I voted to import the lowest iq crime riddeled dumbfucks that'll destroy generations of hardwork, culture and community that I've enjoyed for so long!
(((They))) pushed women’s sufferage & prohibition in the meantime.
Queen Victoria -
>I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights," with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were women to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen, and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.
>In an 1870 letter, quoted for example in All For Love: Seven Centuries of Illicit Liaison by Val Horsler (2006), p. 104. At the bottom of this page, it is mentioned that the comment was written in a letter to Sir Theodore Martin in reaction to news "that Viscountess Amberley had become president of the Bristol and West of England Women's Suffrage Society and had addressed a ... public meeting on the subject." The author of the page, Helena Wojtczak, says here that while other sources often fail to give the context, she "researched and discovered the source of the quote".
She predicted the future to a T