Allegedly. I suspect "gait recognition" is like ballistic fingerprinting where it's "well in theory, in ideal conditions, with a perfect sample..." but in reality probably is no better than a big fat guess. Subtle variations in your gait is supposed to throw off "gait recognition" but if that was the case, so would being more tired than usual, being happier, wearing different shoes, wearing pants, holding something, etc.
Agreed. The tech may exist but the efficacy of such a thing once deployed is almost always exaggerated, or the perception of it's capabilities is based on bullshit (((entertainment))) that makes the state, their zogbots, and their tools seem far more fearsome than they actually are.
Kind of like how all those CSI type shows made people think all criminal investigators are also scientific geniuses who will essentially "sniff out" microscopic amounds of dna or other "smoking gun" matter at every crime scene, when the reality is most of them have limited if any actual investigative talent and are a surprisingly small part of a process, often producing nothing of value (or nothing at all).
If there has been an instance of someone being caught due to "gait recognition" alone, it most likely was some peg-leg Pete - about as ideal a condition as you're gonna get in the walking-assessment trade.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
While they're a lot of fun and badass it's kind of creepy to look at shows like Mission Impossible, James Bond, Jason Bourne, etc. or even novels like *literally everything Tom Clancy ever wrote* and how they normalize the idea of functionally extrajudicial, unaccountable, limitless behaviors on behalf of government agents to basically go anywhere and kill or destroy anything they want anywhere in the world on the sole basis that "well they're bad".
I'll stop short of saying it was intentional - in the case of Tom Clancy and Ian Fleming they probably just wanted to write cool stories of spies and intrigue and nobody wants to read a story about political bickering and laws of war (well unless you're also Tom Clancy with books like The Bear and the Dragon which was a good story but it's like 6,000 pages long and mostly political bickering). And Ian Fleming didnt really focus on real world politics too much (some exceptions involving the USSR in one or two novels) instead inventing villainous characters who were operating outside any government or: Blofeld.
But it all definitely becomes a form of propaganda in its own way.
I've heard of gait recognition technology many years ago but I suspect it entered common knowledge because it started showing up in TV shows and movies. I think I only saw it in one of the Punisher series on Netflix (I think the guy in hiding tracks Frank Castle that way) and I believe one of the Mission Impossibles (an old guy is walking into a secure area and they have a display tracking his movement).
But Mission Impossible also had a projector you could put up in a hallway that renders a perfect parallax of the hall by tracking eye movement, forming an invisibility field, which is another "yes, but also no" technology.
It's even funnier to me to think about this technology existing but due to quotas and box checking those maintaining & operating it are a bunch of diversity they/thems who respond with "din fine nuttin serjint" to every request for a progress update.
1 year ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)2 children
Eerie. Wait until the advanced neuralink chip is released and required in your body to buy, that thing is rumored to completely nullify your privacy and emotions, making you a glazed zombie (it controls your neurons). Death penalty if you don't get it.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
It's already in your (((smart))) phone and that (((plastic card))) you pay with. Neurallink basically put that same technology in your body, under your skin. See you can always throw your wallet and your phone in nearest river, or have multiple of those if you need a backup identity, like a anti-semitic one and a shabbos goy looking one. You can't simply chop your hand off and run tho.
Right now it's being tested on monkeys. But the goal is a chip that serves as a biometric data collector/manipulator aka "human hacker." Not to sound like a redditor, but this will literally create slaves. Hence the death penalty for refusing it.
"Eye scans" makes me skeptical about this. The eye scanner like in Minority Report are still science fiction. When's the last time you went to an optometrist? They don't even have gear that can image your eye without shoving your face against the device. Even an image from a closer camera like a self checkout would only have the resolution to "scan" your eye in so far as a normal picture to get your eye color.
Actual retina imaging is like fingerprints where it's indexing marks, patterns, blood vessels, etc in your retina. There's no chance any camera on the planet has that fidelity to do that from further than mere inches away. And if you could do that, well you could also image fingerprints which are more pronounced, but notice there's no talk about that?
Also since like 80% of the world has brown eyes, without deliberately illuminating your eyes with a bright light (again, think optometrist) you'd at best just image a dark blob.
And I doubt a random grocery store has some hyper advanced technology that would cost millions when none of this is even necessary in the first place since you can just sniff for phones or even card RFIDs.
Sunglasses
Born a mute
Or, just don't shop there.
Kind of like how all those CSI type shows made people think all criminal investigators are also scientific geniuses who will essentially "sniff out" microscopic amounds of dna or other "smoking gun" matter at every crime scene, when the reality is most of them have limited if any actual investigative talent and are a surprisingly small part of a process, often producing nothing of value (or nothing at all).
If there has been an instance of someone being caught due to "gait recognition" alone, it most likely was some peg-leg Pete - about as ideal a condition as you're gonna get in the walking-assessment trade.
I'll stop short of saying it was intentional - in the case of Tom Clancy and Ian Fleming they probably just wanted to write cool stories of spies and intrigue and nobody wants to read a story about political bickering and laws of war (well unless you're also Tom Clancy with books like The Bear and the Dragon which was a good story but it's like 6,000 pages long and mostly political bickering). And Ian Fleming didnt really focus on real world politics too much (some exceptions involving the USSR in one or two novels) instead inventing villainous characters who were operating outside any government or: Blofeld.
But it all definitely becomes a form of propaganda in its own way.
I've heard of gait recognition technology many years ago but I suspect it entered common knowledge because it started showing up in TV shows and movies. I think I only saw it in one of the Punisher series on Netflix (I think the guy in hiding tracks Frank Castle that way) and I believe one of the Mission Impossibles (an old guy is walking into a secure area and they have a display tracking his movement).
But Mission Impossible also had a projector you could put up in a hallway that renders a perfect parallax of the hall by tracking eye movement, forming an invisibility field, which is another "yes, but also no" technology.