Democracy leads to subversion. Always. You can’t fix that.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
On paper this dullard who does not get she has been scammed and believes in idiotic things while being trash -- owns some thing, is retired and worked for years, is a parent -- she then qualifies as being a viable voter -- but would you trust this person to vote?
If we reduce genuine democracy to elites, then the obvious occur and your are soulless.
If we reduce genuine democracy to any metric, there is a gap some where that voids the efficacy of democracy entirely.
It is hard to not see dictatorships as the only viable solution to countries. There just need be standards to this that protect the arrangement. Power corrupts absolutely.. so there needs to be some hindrance to authority from empowering citizens against citizens.
There are no democracies in nature.. it is a human invention.. and it is ruinous.
If we reduce genuine democracy to elites, then the obvious occur and your are soulless.
If we reduce genuine democracy to any metric, there is a gap some where that voids the efficacy of democracy entirely.
It is hard to not see dictatorships as the only viable solution to countries. There just need be standards to this that protect the arrangement. Power corrupts absolutely.. so there needs to be some hindrance to authority from empowering citizens against citizens.
There are no democracies in nature.. it is a human invention.. and it is ruinous.
Toast message
You don't.
Like John Adam said, the Constitution is only fit for a moral and religious people. Trumptards and Kamalatards don't have morals or religion (Trumptards pretend to, but their actions speak louder than words).
For America to return to what it was, it needs a dictatorship to enforce morality and religion upon these degenerates.
But ayh am troubled by how a dictator is 'chosen' as if we went by modern standards, they would be a person of great wealth and business acumen as opposed to a great leader of people.
There has to be a moment (again) where this land is reconquered by men of violence -- and prove they lead by strength and matched intelligence and not by grifting.
That's the conclusion I arrived at.
In a perfect world, I'd still advocate for absolute freedom but, after seeing how freedom was subverted to do away with freedom, I realized that freedom is not for everyone. Basically, great power, great responsibility, and it must be safeguarded. And if no one is brave enough to safeguard it, then we'll all just end up as slaves to those who are brave enough to grab power for themselves.
>But ayh am troubled by how a dictator is 'chosen' as if we went by modern standards, they would be a person of great wealth and business acumen as opposed to a great leader of people.
Agreed, and also the current generation of people don't possess the qualities and characteristics to be great leaders.
>There has to be a moment (again) where this land is reconquered by men of violence -- and prove they lead by strength and matched intelligence and not by grifting.
I hope you're right, but I'm not too optimistic.
History teaches us, every thing has a limit.