New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
14
A “berg” sunk the Olympic. But you guys already know that. (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror )
13 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
8
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 1 child
Congrats on disproving your own theory. You’re literally showing that it was Titanic. The first image is purposely flipped to misdirect.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You might be right about the flipped image. But i do believe you are wrong on this one. See the two images https://postimg.cc/gallery/pLSfSPy

Even if both images were flipped front to back. The upper deck is fully opened on the olympic and the Titanic is partially more opend towdrs the back top deck
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Right, and the sunken one is half closed. This happened after Olympic first set sail because the passengers were being hit with spray near the fore of A deck. Titanic’ s design was modified during construction to enclose that part of the deck.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Did not know that. Thanks for enlightening me on that part.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
8
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 2 children
I was a Titanic “buff” as a kid, so a lot of this stuff stuck. In all my research, I never found a single original document suggesting that Astor, ✡Guggenheim,✡ or ✡Strauss✡ were *ever* against the idea of a central bank, either. That gets reposted a lot.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
6
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 3 children
Not saying I don't believe you, but why sink the ship then? I pretty much refuse to believe that it was simply an "accident", because such an "accident" has literally never happened before or since IIRC.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Continue thread...
3
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Yes i have heard this argument my self alot. But no one has ever shown any physical evidence on the matter. I did go threw my Titanic phase as well as kid by you clearly went alot further then i did.

Perhaps not that they were against the central bank, but maybe jews taking out other jews like drug carrles take out other drug cartels for control and power grab
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
Harambe on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
"They swapped the ships" is the same shit as "they used nukes on 9/11". Nonsense to distract from the real truth of the event.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message