1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
The problem with this strategy is that it is logically inconsistent with victory.
The US military has gotten its “tooth to tail” ratio down to 4:1, which means there are 4 support personnel needed for each active fighter to be able to do their job.
If you want a coherent, strong movement, than you need at least 4 times as many passive contributors, informants and collaborators as you need active zealots, proselytizers and fighters.
This is why Islam is so successful. For every one boot on the ground jihadist beating down opposition, you have a handful of “normal people” feeding them, hiding them, misdirecting their enemy and saying “Islam is the religion of peace, but maybe you shouldn’t piss it off 😇”.
We need a similar focus, a message that attracts the masses of supporters while also keeping the front line engaged.
This will be hard for a lot of you to hear, and I know I've said it here before.
The swastika and nazim will never win you favor or prestige on America, or the west in general. Embracing it is choosing to lose from the start. You and I both know who the good guys were in World War 2 l, but "big normie" won't be convinced out of their decades of indoctrination, and any symboligy that immediately puts off 95% of the population is shooting yourself in the foot.
Sorry, but the Nazis lost. Build a new movement based on their ideals, but don't make yourself dead on arrival by coopting their image. You dont influence the masses by needing to explain to everyone why your symbols are not just good, but not evil.
Listen buddy, it doesn't matter that you and I know what the swastika truly represents. You don't influence mass conscienceness via needing lengthy explanations and history lessons. For propaganda to be effective, it needs to create an emotional response. The emotional response to the swastika from LITERALLY EVERYBODY not on here or /pol/ is revulsion and opposition.
By embracing the swastika you're choosing to lose. But hey "at least I kept my principals!". Sound familiar?
The US military has gotten its “tooth to tail” ratio down to 4:1, which means there are 4 support personnel needed for each active fighter to be able to do their job.
If you want a coherent, strong movement, than you need at least 4 times as many passive contributors, informants and collaborators as you need active zealots, proselytizers and fighters.
This is why Islam is so successful. For every one boot on the ground jihadist beating down opposition, you have a handful of “normal people” feeding them, hiding them, misdirecting their enemy and saying “Islam is the religion of peace, but maybe you shouldn’t piss it off 😇”.
We need a similar focus, a message that attracts the masses of supporters while also keeping the front line engaged.
The Christian’s are all support and no teeth, and every European nationalist movement has been all teeth and no support.
No movement has adequately married the two.