Bravo
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
17 comments:
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Hey, can you make a password protected unlisted Pastebin https://pastebin.com/ post with the source code and DM me the link so I can port your substitution table and algorithms into JavaScript? I can either host a web form on a free service, make a Tampermonkey script, a plugin, or just a bookmarklet.
Sure. I'll send you the link in a moment.
But the code is really simple actually. The difficult part was the tedious work of looking through the characters and finding the best ones. It would be great to have some better tool though... I think a browser extension might be best where you can right click text and run the conversion.
But the code is really simple actually. The difficult part was the tedious work of looking through the characters and finding the best ones. It would be great to have some better tool though... I think a browser extension might be best where you can right click text and run the conversion.
> The difficult part was the tedious work of looking through the characters and finding the best ones.
Yeah, that's why I just made a bookmarklet to open the qaz.wtf converter for me lol. But your 2 modes seems like a nice inclusion as well, and I want that to be accurate. A lot of people won't trust some unknown executable and many can't build from source so even open source code is suspect to them.
Yeah, that's why I just made a bookmarklet to open the qaz.wtf converter for me lol. But your 2 modes seems like a nice inclusion as well, and I want that to be accurate. A lot of people won't trust some unknown executable and many can't build from source so even open source code is suspect to them.
This is a better more advanced solution to the one I used which was usually just using math sans from qaz.wtf unicode toys.
EXCEPT
It could be a javascript, which could be turned into a bookmarklet to only convert the selected text.
So maybe after I get showered I'll take a look since I'm free until 2pm today.
EXCEPT
It could be a javascript, which could be turned into a bookmarklet to only convert the selected text.
So maybe after I get showered I'll take a look since I'm free until 2pm today.
I have the first result. I used this on a YouTube video where someone wondered why White only towns do so well compared to nigger-infested shitholes, and told about the average IQ of niggers being 70 and that of Whites being around 100-102. The jewtube algorithm picked it up. I used it without obfuscating spaces.
Btw, it seems I can write comments, but I am banned on some channels. I got that naughty hate speech dialog box. Fucking spineless nigger-kike-faggots.
Btw, it seems I can write comments, but I am banned on some channels. I got that naughty hate speech dialog box. Fucking spineless nigger-kike-faggots.
Neat idea, but it is countered by checking the text against a dictionary, which they already do to look for "evil" words. The procedure would go something like this:
Select a few words from the text, then see if they are in some prepared dictionary.
If they are not, check a few more just to be sure, and then flag the post when that fails.
Since the letters are not the correct letters the words checked will not show in the dictionary. After all the computer never sees anything other than the UTF codes. It's won't add any more difficulty to the censoring of text, but it will flag the user as someone to watch and censor.
The better solution is to use guarded language and sometimes euphemisms to bypass simple word filters.
Select a few words from the text, then see if they are in some prepared dictionary.
If they are not, check a few more just to be sure, and then flag the post when that fails.
Since the letters are not the correct letters the words checked will not show in the dictionary. After all the computer never sees anything other than the UTF codes. It's won't add any more difficulty to the censoring of text, but it will flag the user as someone to watch and censor.
The better solution is to use guarded language and sometimes euphemisms to bypass simple word filters.
I went through the spectrum of the character map, so it's even a mix of various character types. Unless they specifically convert all characters to standard Latin characters and then check in their dictionaries, it won't work.
There is no dictionary that could encompass words with these characters. You'd have to create all possible character variations. Also the spaces are changed too, meaning they may not even be identified as spaces, thus the entire text may appear as a single coherent word.
Either way, this should only stop their algorithms from parsing what you write, but people can still report you, and that uses a system unrelated to what you wrote. So you should use guarded language and euphemisms anyways.
There is no dictionary that could encompass words with these characters. You'd have to create all possible character variations. Also the spaces are changed too, meaning they may not even be identified as spaces, thus the entire text may appear as a single coherent word.
Either way, this should only stop their algorithms from parsing what you write, but people can still report you, and that uses a system unrelated to what you wrote. So you should use guarded language and euphemisms anyways.
If anyone cared they would just spellcheck it and notice too many words were weird
Or syllable check or lexeme check
Spammers already use this kind of replacement so Google's spam filter for Gmail will already do these kind of checks. I would check back on YouTube comments you've made to see if they remain up.
Or syllable check or lexeme check
Spammers already use this kind of replacement so Google's spam filter for Gmail will already do these kind of checks. I would check back on YouTube comments you've made to see if they remain up.
Yes, I am still waiting for upvotes and responses. Sometimes there is nothing, so it can take a while. But it looks like my comments were still up. Sometimes I saw them missing while I still got notifications.
> If anyone cared
That requires them to notice too.
> Spammers already use this kind of replacement
Yes. But this is solely meant to circumvent their algorithms. So far only YouTube comes to mind.
> If anyone cared
That requires them to notice too.
> Spammers already use this kind of replacement
Yes. But this is solely meant to circumvent their algorithms. So far only YouTube comes to mind.
The word not being in their dictionary is the flag, not a reverse conversion.
A simple example: Will vs WiII, the second isn't in the dictionary and thus would flag the account.
Just by using something that a machine cannot parse, you show that you are trying to get something by it. Think of it kinda like refusing to let a cop search you. That just makes them want to search you more.
And making them search a dictionary is just a linear time computation, so it would only increase their costs slightly.
Now your program does have use for smaller sites (like thedonald) where they don't have much in the way of infrastructure and thus run up against the scunthrorpe problem more easily.
A simple example: Will vs WiII, the second isn't in the dictionary and thus would flag the account.
Just by using something that a machine cannot parse, you show that you are trying to get something by it. Think of it kinda like refusing to let a cop search you. That just makes them want to search you more.
And making them search a dictionary is just a linear time computation, so it would only increase their costs slightly.
Now your program does have use for smaller sites (like thedonald) where they don't have much in the way of infrastructure and thus run up against the scunthrorpe problem more easily.
Sure, that could work. But what about misspellings or alternative spellings? What about other languages with different letters? What about niggerbabble?
They can't just flag and/or ban accounts for having words not conforming to their dictionary. What if somebody just invents a new word or says something rare? To believe that they have the entire dictionary of all existing words, and to conclude that only those are permissible is insane. It would cause a LOT of continuous issues, and it would cause a lot of people to falsely be punished and/or banned.
Also my YT account is already flagged for wrong-think, so either I go cuck mode or I do this.
As I said, I will use my tool. Others can do too. But I primarily did it for myself.
They can't just flag and/or ban accounts for having words not conforming to their dictionary. What if somebody just invents a new word or says something rare? To believe that they have the entire dictionary of all existing words, and to conclude that only those are permissible is insane. It would cause a LOT of continuous issues, and it would cause a lot of people to falsely be punished and/or banned.
Also my YT account is already flagged for wrong-think, so either I go cuck mode or I do this.
As I said, I will use my tool. Others can do too. But I primarily did it for myself.
Toast message