Everyone has had the conversation "the nazis were communist".
"Why?"
"Uhh well uhh national SOCIALIST, and socialists are communists!"
But almost every communist country goes by the title "people's republic". Therefore communists, who are actually socialists, who are actually nazis, are actually republicans.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
People tend to get confused over ideologies, there's thousands of different versions and implementations, some more or less successful. No communist country has ever went all in on the (((Marx))) agenda, no communist country ever reached the promised state of utopia, always ending up with a dictator and a bunch of corrupt oligarchs.
Socialism is more related to the workers movement, although communists and other leftist groups often tries to steal this popular term. Socialism lays the foundation for a homogeneous high trust society, throw in some democratic elements and a lot of nationalism and you'll get very close to the perfect society were everyone can thrive after contributing, were lechers are deported, isolated or curb stomped.
Capitalism on it's own is a joke, without regulations, whoever jew the others the most will come out as the winner by charging the most for the shittiest products while treating their workers the worst and polluting the most to keep operational costs low. Modern day America is the perfect example, full of fake products, fake meat made from soy instead of actual meat, because it's 30 times cheaper to produce. No legit farmer is ever gonna be able to compete with that.
Then there's China, MIGA tards think they're communist, but so many aspects of it looks capitalist nowadays, like a one party state. Or a capitalist dictatorship. That is also possible, through mass surveillance, patriotism and endless propaganda people can be fooled to believe that they have freedom, even tho they live in a dictatorship. People in China can own properties but not land, it gives them the illusion of freedom or the "land of opportunity" when in reality only a few people will ever succeed.
It's funny how MIGA who hates China fails to see the similarities between modern day America and China.
> Socialism lays the foundation for a homogeneous high trust society
No. You have to understand that the root of ALL leftist ideologies, and especially communism is "equality." The more radical they are, the more it is based on the idea of equality. And they are not seeking equality, they assume it is there to begin with, and only needs some "fixing" to manifest, which is supposed to lead to equality of outcome.
It means they believe niggers are just like you, faggots are just like you, so why oppose degeneracy and why oppose infinite nigger importation? Sure you must be an uneducated bigot! Didn't you learn in school how niggers are equal to humans?!
And if the country doesn't already have some form of niggers (muslims, Turkeys, pure niggers, gypsies, Indians), they will seek to import them. Because "diversity" and "save the pensions."
> high trust society
It literally promotes neighbors telling on each other, and even children reporting their own parents. They consider this an extraordinary proof of their adherence to the ruling ideology. And ultimately it's all about optics.
> Capitalism on it's own is a joke
As it is, yes. But that's not capitalism (aka free market). We have a jewish occupation - an oligarchy lead by a jewish central bank, that is communist in root. The jews are doing fraud schemes left and right, and they are getting away with it. The regulations are there to fuck YOU, not them. While niggers are allowed to burn and loot, which is falsely called "anarcho-tyranny", while it's actually just "tyranny" with niggers used as bio-weapons against Whites.
And as of the US, there is something ridiculously insane: You can literally sue someone who tries to expose your fraud schemes, just so that you both burn money that goes to jewish lawyers and the courts. And we are talking about MILLIONS of dollars. And you do not even have to pull through and get to court - you can just do it as intimidation tactics.
Does any of this sound like "free market" to you? The foundation of the US system is rooted in broken systems rotten away by corruption and idiocy.
> Or a capitalist dictatorship.
It's nationalistic, has communism vaguely as its ideological foundation, oligarchic, but also state-capitalistic, namely aggressively using it when dealing with foreign businesses, and also seeking global economic dominance.
At this point it's safe to say that all ideologies has been more or less (((subverted))) from their original intended purposes. The left as in workers movement used to be the most racist ideology, because immigrants steal jobs.
Cuckservatives wanted more immigrants because of the fraudulent (((debt))) based economy which requires more people, an ever growing population to work, and if natives don't have enough kids, cuckservatives are fine with importing from other countries, including niggers and pajeets, most cuckservatives are materialistic and care more about money than their country.
Regulations was not originally intended to screw the little guy, that's all (((subversion))), and a result of (((lobbying))).
Liberalism is just stupid, assuming that everyone are honest and that a multiculturalist society without rules could possibly work without (((oligarchs))) taking over and making (((monopolies))).
Honestly, the ideologies of today are so subverted that they might not even be related to the ideologies of the past. By making such connections we just further subvert them. Right vs left is yet another jewish trick to keep people divided. Just the idea of putting all ideologies on a linear scale is just retarded, often there's more than two solutions. I don't want to elect red jew or blue jew, I want total extermination of jews, but that's not on the right-left scale or part of any known modern ideology.
> At this point it's safe to say that all ideologies has been more or less (((subverted))) from their original intended purposes.
This is certainly correct. We only see things in their corrupt form today.
> Right vs left is yet another jewish trick to keep people divided.
They clearly use it to have 2 parties (or ideological factions) play ball, who are both in their pockets and serving the jews. The US Democrats are the ideological hand of the jew, the US Republicans are the economic hand of the jew.
I do not even believe that the left today has any merit to their ideology - equality does not exist, and any attempt to seek it is bad for society. And the right wing (aka conservatives) are spineless cowards who will let their country go to hell only so that they can have their pensions and their moral high ground.
Fundamentally conservatism would have a purpose: To preserve a system that works. But we are centuries into it deviating from what it should be, so they just follow the wake of leftists with 2-5 years delay and believe because they oppose children being *secretly* castrated they are the good guys.
And workers having unions to protect against greedy jewish exploiters is only necessary because the entirety of corporate structures are defined by a soulless, materialistic, selfish nihilism, where every employee is expendable. They all were corrupt enough to shackle themselves to become beholden jewish "shareholders", so that their sole interest becomes to preserve the company and to squeeze out as much as possible from everybody they can, to see their reputation as a resource that may need to be "withdrawn from" occasionally. Oh and don't forget the DEI quotas to install incompetent niggers and women, or oh-oh, your credit rating drops, and your shareholder masters won't like it!
> I want total extermination of jews, but that's not on the right-left scale or part of any known modern ideology.
Exactly. The only relevant scale is "do you want jews to rule you?" vs "have your own people rule your country."
Socialism is more related to the workers movement, although communists and other leftist groups often tries to steal this popular term. Socialism lays the foundation for a homogeneous high trust society, throw in some democratic elements and a lot of nationalism and you'll get very close to the perfect society were everyone can thrive after contributing, were lechers are deported, isolated or curb stomped.
Capitalism on it's own is a joke, without regulations, whoever jew the others the most will come out as the winner by charging the most for the shittiest products while treating their workers the worst and polluting the most to keep operational costs low. Modern day America is the perfect example, full of fake products, fake meat made from soy instead of actual meat, because it's 30 times cheaper to produce. No legit farmer is ever gonna be able to compete with that.
Then there's China, MIGA tards think they're communist, but so many aspects of it looks capitalist nowadays, like a one party state. Or a capitalist dictatorship. That is also possible, through mass surveillance, patriotism and endless propaganda people can be fooled to believe that they have freedom, even tho they live in a dictatorship. People in China can own properties but not land, it gives them the illusion of freedom or the "land of opportunity" when in reality only a few people will ever succeed.
It's funny how MIGA who hates China fails to see the similarities between modern day America and China.
No. You have to understand that the root of ALL leftist ideologies, and especially communism is "equality." The more radical they are, the more it is based on the idea of equality. And they are not seeking equality, they assume it is there to begin with, and only needs some "fixing" to manifest, which is supposed to lead to equality of outcome.
It means they believe niggers are just like you, faggots are just like you, so why oppose degeneracy and why oppose infinite nigger importation? Sure you must be an uneducated bigot! Didn't you learn in school how niggers are equal to humans?!
And if the country doesn't already have some form of niggers (muslims, Turkeys, pure niggers, gypsies, Indians), they will seek to import them. Because "diversity" and "save the pensions."
> high trust society
It literally promotes neighbors telling on each other, and even children reporting their own parents. They consider this an extraordinary proof of their adherence to the ruling ideology. And ultimately it's all about optics.
> Capitalism on it's own is a joke
As it is, yes. But that's not capitalism (aka free market). We have a jewish occupation - an oligarchy lead by a jewish central bank, that is communist in root. The jews are doing fraud schemes left and right, and they are getting away with it. The regulations are there to fuck YOU, not them. While niggers are allowed to burn and loot, which is falsely called "anarcho-tyranny", while it's actually just "tyranny" with niggers used as bio-weapons against Whites.
And as of the US, there is something ridiculously insane: You can literally sue someone who tries to expose your fraud schemes, just so that you both burn money that goes to jewish lawyers and the courts. And we are talking about MILLIONS of dollars. And you do not even have to pull through and get to court - you can just do it as intimidation tactics.
Does any of this sound like "free market" to you? The foundation of the US system is rooted in broken systems rotten away by corruption and idiocy.
> Or a capitalist dictatorship.
It's nationalistic, has communism vaguely as its ideological foundation, oligarchic, but also state-capitalistic, namely aggressively using it when dealing with foreign businesses, and also seeking global economic dominance.
Cuckservatives wanted more immigrants because of the fraudulent (((debt))) based economy which requires more people, an ever growing population to work, and if natives don't have enough kids, cuckservatives are fine with importing from other countries, including niggers and pajeets, most cuckservatives are materialistic and care more about money than their country.
Regulations was not originally intended to screw the little guy, that's all (((subversion))), and a result of (((lobbying))).
Liberalism is just stupid, assuming that everyone are honest and that a multiculturalist society without rules could possibly work without (((oligarchs))) taking over and making (((monopolies))).
Honestly, the ideologies of today are so subverted that they might not even be related to the ideologies of the past. By making such connections we just further subvert them. Right vs left is yet another jewish trick to keep people divided. Just the idea of putting all ideologies on a linear scale is just retarded, often there's more than two solutions. I don't want to elect red jew or blue jew, I want total extermination of jews, but that's not on the right-left scale or part of any known modern ideology.
This is certainly correct. We only see things in their corrupt form today.
> Right vs left is yet another jewish trick to keep people divided.
They clearly use it to have 2 parties (or ideological factions) play ball, who are both in their pockets and serving the jews. The US Democrats are the ideological hand of the jew, the US Republicans are the economic hand of the jew.
I do not even believe that the left today has any merit to their ideology - equality does not exist, and any attempt to seek it is bad for society. And the right wing (aka conservatives) are spineless cowards who will let their country go to hell only so that they can have their pensions and their moral high ground.
Fundamentally conservatism would have a purpose: To preserve a system that works. But we are centuries into it deviating from what it should be, so they just follow the wake of leftists with 2-5 years delay and believe because they oppose children being *secretly* castrated they are the good guys.
And workers having unions to protect against greedy jewish exploiters is only necessary because the entirety of corporate structures are defined by a soulless, materialistic, selfish nihilism, where every employee is expendable. They all were corrupt enough to shackle themselves to become beholden jewish "shareholders", so that their sole interest becomes to preserve the company and to squeeze out as much as possible from everybody they can, to see their reputation as a resource that may need to be "withdrawn from" occasionally. Oh and don't forget the DEI quotas to install incompetent niggers and women, or oh-oh, your credit rating drops, and your shareholder masters won't like it!
> I want total extermination of jews, but that's not on the right-left scale or part of any known modern ideology.
Exactly. The only relevant scale is "do you want jews to rule you?" vs "have your own people rule your country."