"inciting racial hatred"
(twitter.com)
It’s laughable how language is clearly under attack, when merely stating the obvious about these low IQ sand niggers is somehow correlated with “inciting hatred”. When one looks at a piece of shit on the ground and describes it in appearance and in smell, the best I could call it is disgust. There’s no hatred for describing a soulless sandrat, shitskins, or nigger. It’s mere disgust. Wanting to clean out the subhuman jew filth should be the duty of a human being, as part of it’s most important duty, looking after his family.
1. Do nothing and hope people get bored and forget, which works btw,
2. Intimidate the people, raising the stakes higher. It means either they forfeit or they go all-in and escalate.
The latter requires them to be so confident, so arrogant, that they think they can oppress the English in England. We'll see what happens.
**Cultural revolution against negrolatry!**
Further than "identity politics", White resisters *can* and *should* play the same game as the Frankfurt School.
Then the Scofield Bible exploded in popularity in the south, probably on purpose, the boomers and greatest gen raised with that specific Bible developed a hardline pro israel stance because that version of the Bible was written solely as a propaganda piece. The lost generation was the last generation of the south that was vehemently anti judaism. That text is a dangerous book. The trickery that it can play on your mind is very subtle, but potent, and it was written by a lifelong con man paid off by jews. So it makes sense.
There has been a Christian zionist movement for a long time. How the modern American Christian zionist movement differs from its predecessors is as follows: the ancestors of this movement believed that jews should and must convert, that the establishment of the 3rd temple must be hastened for the return of Christ, and that the jews *would* convert out of destiny. Not that jews were the chosen of God, not that Judaism was a good thing or the original old testament religion, and not that we should support Judaism as a religion at all. This was the line of belief of the puritans and their predecessors. It also coincides heavily with British Israelism. My personal theory on this is that, believing that they were the original israelites and God's chosen people, they thought that they must help the corrupted and religious jews find Christ. Hopefully ignorant, but not malicious or philosemitic in nature. It did fuck shit up though. Cromwell committed one of the greatest mistakes possible by believing this.
Modern American dispensationalism differs as follows: the belief that jews are God's chosen people with special privileges, the belief that supporting the jewish people will bless you with spiritual and material gain, that jews are good for the sake of their Judaism, that judaism is the religion of the old testament and jews are the people thereof, and belief in the rapture. The only thing retained from puritan zionism is the belief in hastening the establishment of the third temple. They are very different beliefs at their core. The modern American version of Christian zionism is woefully philosemitic.
The impetus for the growth of dispensationalism in the United States, especially the south, was the Scofield Bible. And most new American translations of the Bible since the Scofield Bible have been based on the Scofield Bible.
They literally cannot put 2 and 2 together because they have been raised from birth to believe in dispensationalism. You can show them every bit of evidence in the world and it won't correlate because they believe that jews are the opposite of this and are the pillars of righteousness as the chosen of God. It's one of, if not the most dangerous, psyops that have ever been done. Bolshevism doesn't even hold a candle to how jews have managed to effectively infest Christianity with a gangrenous rot.
what?
So they will be the ones to agitate, rile up the normies.