They'll never leave you alone
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Are you here to be a bombastic tard, or argue in good faith? I'm heavily leaning towards the former. You're comment history isn't inspiring. It actually appears that you're a subtle obfuscation for the kike.
If you want to talk about MEFO bills, just say you want to talk about MEFO bills. And lets not start by nefariously trying to conflate those with civilian currency and personal finance, shall we?
Any country visionary enough to change the world for the better, will have to battle the worse they're leaving behind. This includes pan-continental jewry and usury.
I just want to know what the ban usury folks expect to replace our current debt financing system with. I don't understand how you can have a system of credit if lenders are not allowed to earn any profit on their lending. And if there's not supposed to be any credit or borrowing, then how do massive capital developments occur? How do you build a billion dollar car factory without debt financing?
If you borrow $15,000 to build a home, you owe that loan back plus a borrowers fee of $500.
If you borrow $100,000 to build a factory, you owe that loan back plus a borrowers fee of $2000.
There is none of this current *"30 year mortgage but actually 15 years of that is going to pay kike interest"* we have now. And the current system wouldn't even necessarily be a bad thing, but wages have remained stagnant for the last 3-4 decades.
It used to be the 30 year mortgage was for people in a pinch or young people just starting out with almost nothing. The point was to get rock bottom monthly mortgage payments on the front end, so you could stabilize later and refinance down to a 15 or 10 year loan. You can still do this, it's just harder and harder with every generation.
The 30 year monthly mortgage payments aren't rock bottom anymore to allow you to save. They're standard: What people can afford along with their families and other expenses without overspending.
The entire concept is absurd anyway. Imagine taking 1/3rd of your life to pay off a small family home on standard wages. That's not a country set up for the people living in it. That's a country subverted by kike banks, compounding interest and fractional reserve jewry.
This right here is a MASSIVE hole in their schemes that I understood even as early as 12-13 years old. I couldn't quantify why, but it was so curious to me how much debt was involved with everything.
I understand maintenance and upkeep... but the roads are already paved, the schools are already built, the land is already plowed, the crops are already sewn, the rivers are already dredged, the factories are already constructed...
I just never understood why everything was so difficult and expensive, ESPECIALLY for newer generations moving forward into an already built society.
Now I know lol
I just don't see anything wrong with this model. People might not have basic math skills to understand it but it's a real simple concept.
The problem is the hidden and additional fees and surcharges, the 40 pages of legalese, and of course the overspending printing and straight up laundering of money at the politics level
Not everyone's wages have remained stagnant. That's the thing about inflation it does not effect an economy equally across the board. Certainly some professions have been stagnant, but others have kept up quite well.
Damn! 40 years!? Holy shit, my man lol
> It just sounds like you want to pay less in interest. That's fine.
I don't want to pay ANY interest. Fuck jews and their anti Christian ways.
> But shouldn't people have the freedom to negotiate the payment amount themselves? Have you considered that lenders may not want to loan you $100,000 in order to earn $2,000? A 2% return? That's pretty shit. Would you risk $100k in the hope of making $2k in profit in 40 years? I sure wouldn't.
You're not understanding. This isn't a private sector institution. NatSoc is a racially aware governemnt, so finance isn't an enterprise you go into with the notion of profiting off your brothers and sisters. It's not a get rich quick scheme. It's not a scheme at all. It's a government controlled institution setup for the benefit of your people. Look at israel.
It helps to view money more as a tool, rather than an all encompassing entity that only serves itself and its own enterprise. Hard to do because the latter is all we've been steeped in and know up to today.
But in a racially harmonious culture/civilization, money is simply a tool of exchange for goods and services between individuals and or business's. It doesn't need to be anything more than that, and I would argue the further you take it over that line, the more insidious and evil it becomes.
> Not everyone's wages have remained stagnant. That's the thing about inflation it does not effect an economy equally across the board. Certainly some professions have been stagnant, but others have kept up quite well.
They certainly haven't kept up with the record high inflation, or the pace of inflation in general. Maybe the top 20%-30% of jobs in society, but that's not where the bulk of the citizenry is employed.
The gap between the rich and poor continues to increase, the middle class continues to shrink, the housing market continues to inflate and you're paying $5 for a gallon of milk, $50 to fill up your 4 cylinder vehicle and inordinate increases in all taxes and services just for the (((culture))) to tell you you're an entitled White cunt while NGOing beaners and dumb niggers over your border.
Is this really the hill you want to die on?
What's the mathematical difference between paying a fee to borrow money, or paying interest on the money borrowed? Your paying extra to get access to that money today. If the extra amount is the same either way then what difference does it make?
Alright, so you don't want any private lending businesses to exist at all. All lending should come from the government, based on it's racially focused goals. So if someone wants to borrow money to build a factory, they have to convince some bureaucrats that this factory will benefit white people. But if that factory / business fails and the loan is not repaid, then the government, and therefore the society as a whole bears the cost. It seems to have a similar problem as the government guaranteed student loan business. You have people in charge of deciding who gets money, that don't have skin in the game as it were. The government guarantees the loans, meaning the general population bear the risk, without having any say in the matter. I won't conclude it's necessarily worse than the system we have now, but I don't think it's a utopian solution either. I kind of like the notion of a real free market in lending, where individual lenders are responsible for calculating risk, and bear the costs of that risk directly.
I don't really care about the gap between rich and poor. I don't think that's an issue at all. Even if it's true, so what? Am I supposed to be angry that Jeff Bezos can buy himself luxury yachts and I can't do the same? Isn't that just an expression of envy? What I care about is my quality of life. More generally I could be concerned about the quality of life of the people in my community. I don't want to live in some dystopian hellscape of shanty towns like South Africa or Brazil. So I don't care about the gap between the richest and poorest, I care about the living standards of the poorest. And that's kind of a mixed bag. Sure there are crazy people and junkies that are completely destitute dregs - but for the most part even the poorest people in the USA have it pretty fucking good. People that are sober don't have to live on the streets or go hungry. There's all kinds of government programs and charities to assist people on hard times.
I do agree though about the niggers. Import the third world become the third world. I just don't really agree that the solution requires a purely European ethnostate. Even Hitler admired the Japs.