deleted2 years ago0 points(+0/-0)Edited 2022-08-14 18:25:30
0
[deleted]
2 years ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Also, I notice that there is a major crossover and conflation by scholars concerning the Khazarians, Scythians, Phrygian, Persians, Parthian, Aryans, and others. I assume it was just because they covered similar geographic areas, but there must be something more that we are missing.
I think Khazarians and Hunnic Asiatics conquered Scythian lands and peoples, causing a confusion in who is who.
Lol…Phrygians? Thats a but confusing as they were only in Greece and Anatolia. And yes the current consensus is that the Huns invaded first, then the Khazars came later on.
Yes, the Phrygian thing is strange. But remember this. They claim the Phrygian cap is purely Phrygian. That cap is found all over Indo European societies. Every Scythian picture I can find from their later ages have them wearing the cap. The cap also made it's way to Germanic and Nordic tribes. There's more about the Phrygians which make me think they are connected, such as Phrygian place names being used by Bactrians and Parthian.
Perhaps…A lot of Greek myths do have origins in Phrygia. Maybe there is some kind of conspiracy going on? Or maybe its just a thing that came from the Yamnaya root?
I think they just don't want to really connect all of the evidence and just say that these cultures and ethnicities are all very similar because they spring from the same root, and we can gather that they were aware of these connections and shared roots better than we are today.
Yeah I think so too... In my studies of the ancients I saw things that baffled me, not just roots. They had an extremely vast knowledge of the world and what is in it.