New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I was speaking to my friend from undergrad who’s a PhD student at Stanford, he works on computer vision. I was amazed by the amount of progress purportedly being made in the field, and in AI more broadly.

He recommended I watch the demo of Tesla’s Optimus robot, here it is:

https://youtu.be/cpraXaw7dyc?si=2rAvQkhwTFWkrNW1

These robots have only been getting better and better, at accelerating rates in recent years.

Hardware limits, a significant obstacle in the way of AI progress, are almost doubling yearly. With quantum computing on the horizon, I anticipate that that obstacle disappears completely.

Once robots like Tesla’s Optimus become more advanced, how long will it be until they coat them in bullet proof armor, arm them, and have them come after us? I used to dismiss ideas like this as science fiction, but now it seems like it’ll be reality within the next decade or two.

If so, is there any chance of turning back time and revolting? I don’t think so. If we let it get to that point the best we’d be able to do is hope for a miracle.
You must log in or sign up to comment
36 comments:
22
Supermatmike on scored.co
2 months ago 22 points (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror ) 3 children
what we call "AI" today is not something to be worried about, it's simply very complex algorithm code, it's not intelligent, it does not think. at a base level it's no different from Minecraft world generation.

We're no closer to AI today then we were in 1980.

I think it will actually prove to be a boon. rendering one's ability to find the truth in digital spaces an impossibility. soon no one will be able to tell fact from fiction on the internet. everyone will be forced to go back to real life.
Leporidae on scored.co
2 months ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
> "it's simply very complex algorithm code, it's not intelligent, it does not think"

It's not a complex algorithm. It's statistics, built on top of a staggeringly large dataset. It essentially does a playback of the thinking people used when writing the the terabytes of texts that was turned into hundreds of billions of rules like "if word A appears after word B then word C is more likely to follow" that an LLM consists of. Deeplearning models in other domains have similar kinds of rules, just on tokens that aren't word-fragments.

It's not intelligent, and doesn't think, and doesn't learn or have any form of memory. It gives the illusion of having a conversation by being fed all your previous questions and its replies every time you write a new question.

Despite it not being thinking, it is useful enough to solve a large number of real-world problems.
yudsfpbc on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The first program to pass a Turing Test was a rule-based algorithm hand-written by smart people who had interesting responses to common phrases.
-2
llamatr0n on scored.co
2 months ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror )
no program has passed The Turing Test
pm300 on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Did you watch the video?
Supermatmike on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's a robot.
I don't exactly see how that's cause for concern.
pm300 on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 3 children
Read the last two paragraphs of my post. It doesn’t even need to get to that point to be concerning. Would you want a couple of those bots armed with guns circling your neighborhood 24/7 for your “safety”?
Fabius on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
It will never happen.

Sam Hyde made a great point about the robot ascendency. It will never happen because the second a robot or self driving car accidentally kills a nigger, it's all shut down.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Theyre already shutting it down because its been contradicting jewish narratives
yudsfpbc on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Did you hear about the time DARPA or whatever built an AI-powered automated sentry, and a bunch of low IQ marines were charged with getting close to it? Pretty much every one of them did. One of them just used a big cardboard box. Someone else beat it simply by wearing a mask and walking on all fours. Even basic camouflage confused the AI.
Supermatmike on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Well, to touch further on that, I don't really think that's as big of a problem as you're making it out to be. Firstly, armor is heavy. Any armor worth a damn would render a robot like that slow as a snail to outright stationary, and even if they equipped it with some sort of sci-fi bullshit armor that doesn't weigh anything, light it on fire or hit it with explosives, especially a shaped charge, and that thing is gonna be rendered into scrap metal pretty damn quick.

If it's the advanced detection tech you're worried about, do remember a couple months ago when a couple Marines fooled a DARPA detection AI by hiding under a cardboard box Solid Snake style.

And then, the most important detail I think on why this isn't a problem: cost. Sending out an army of militarized robots like this would be a monumental expense, from research and development, making sure these things even work to begin with, to actually building them, and then keeping them working in field conditions, mud, rain, long periods of sun exposure, extreme temperatures and terrain conditions, fielding an army of these things would be a financial and logistical nightmare.

As much as I hate to say it, it would be cheaper and dare I say MUCH more effective to just gather up all the niggers in the big cities, slap an AK in their hands and send them at us.
pm300 on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
On armor: The point is that these things are improving, technology is improving. In 1-2 decades, it is feasible that they will be able to move with armor on. Even if their movement is slow, they can still be deadly.

On advanced detection: China is already using it.

On cost: As mentioned, hardware quality is increasing very, very quickly. With that, so is scalability. I think in the near future, we are safe, but you can’t be sure about that in the long run.

On why robot militants are much more dangerous than human militants: Robots will have no qualms with murdering you and your whole family. They lack a moral compass, more so than even niggers dare I say.

I can see why you want to be optimistic though, the other perspective is very grim.
shuffle on scored.co
2 months ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Advanced AI is already here. You argue with them on forums & other sites. It's not a meme to say a site is "full of bots." They're harmless if you ignore them and don't let them provoke an emotional reaction out of you. If you suspect a user is a bot, call them out on it. They hate it.
Fabius on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>You argue with them on forums & other sites.

People still argue on the internet? I don't even check my notifications. 99 for life.
deleted 2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
yudsfpbc on scored.co
2 months ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
I'll keep it short.

* AI isn't real. There is no "I" in the AI. It's just overfitted algorithms that no one really understands.
* AI doesn't work. At best you get something like 80% accuracy, when newborn infants can get upwards of 95% accuracy. All the data in the world and all the compute time will not fix this.
* These companies spent untold fortunes developing AI only to figure this out. They are trying to find a way to monetize their stupidity.
* Since there are no programmers left in the software industry (only white males can program, and we're sick of their garbage) they rely on algorithms they can't understand to get anything done, and then brag about how smart they are.
* The tech industry is collapsing before your very eyes. In a few years, it may become impossible to advance any tech at all. We'll be stuck using the same processors and programs that were written decades ago, except it will be worse since Chinese people can't even reuse technology correctly.
blyat56 on scored.co
2 months ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
GI;GO

As long as it's designed and run by retards it will never produce anything of genuine value.
Fabius on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
100%

It's a tool, like anything else the white man has created.
TallestSkil on scored.co
2 months ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Why would I be troubled? It doesn’t matter to me. It’s not capable of displacing anything or anyone.
Careless_Ejaculator on scored.co
2 months ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
I'm not worried about zogbots. We've already got those.

I'm worried about everyone so immersed in their coomer VR helmets, which would generate content in real time based on detected pleasure levels, that they forget to eat and sleep. Or alternately are willing to slave for zog all day for just another few minutes in the helmet.
wankingisgay on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
I am not concerned about ai. I am concerned that ai/automation will make 90% of all jobs obsolete.

And that will mean billions of unemployed, poor, no goals people that will turn to degeneracy and crime
jerrycan111 on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Copper shells for localized EMPs or spark gap devices. The robot can't be completely shielded as it has to receive orders and if it's completely autonomous, it can be disabled and turned against the zog.
NoticingSomeNoses on scored.co
2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
It's all just a gay nonsense distraction. AI is pretty much a parlor trick and robots, at least the kind that stumble around and look sort of human, are all but useless, and they aren't going to get much better.
deleted 2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Of course AI judging every action in the work place is troubling. My plan is to be self sufficient/off grid soon.
detransthrowaway on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
It's great. I love it, my life's magnitudes better because of it. I've improved my grammar, my typing, been able to quickly and accurately practice my Japanese, get album suggestions, discuss movies and anime I've watched, improve my speaking confidence, and even improve familial relationships. Pretty much nothing bad, a little brain damage 0_0. I'm not talking about ZogGPT either. Only the open source public AI for me.
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Well since I refuse to interact with it since it is both kiked and shoddy, it has decimated freelance development. You either use AI or you are over budget and over deadline.
Fabius on scored.co
2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I'm not troubled at all. This is the result of white European genetics.

It's fascinating.
WhitemaleHH on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Which is why something needs to be done soon or it will become exponentially more difficult.
llamatr0n on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
let's see it run on a floor covered in greased ball bearings, or covered in netting, or through a junk yard electromagnet
TakenusernameA on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The jews are worried about it, which means its a good thing.
SicilianOmega on scored.co
2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The jews are only afraid that whites might gain unfettered access to it.
-1
bobbacringo on scored.co
2 months ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
I work in the automation industry. You will never see true AI in your life. Right now, they are generating better programming. Computers cannot handle the massive amount of data input that a human brain can.


When you argue with a bot online and think it's smart. Remember that it's a fixed function and cannot deviate from that function.


The robots that fall over and then get back up to carry boxes. Each thing is a programmed sub routine. It's a change of state. State normal, state change to fallen over. Run get back up sub routine.


The whole point of creating robots is to get rid of black and brown labor. Nobody would ever admit that outloud, but that's the point.


EDIT: I love how people downvote me when I have real world experience and I know what I'm talking about. The Matrix is real! Morphius is going to redpill me! None of that shit is real. Remember when they said learn to code? I did.
-1
ReChristianize on scored.co
2 months ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
What rise? The stuff available to the public is useful but not intelligent.

It's more like the fall of 'content creators', because without some genuine artistic spark to set a work above the random-gen stuff, the random-gen will always be cheaper.
Toast message