Consume Product

Conntroversial take: there is no morality. There is only Consequence.

The Consequence of letting murderers go. The Consequence of letting invaders into your home. The Consequence of hiring incompetence to build.

Consequence isn't always deserved. It can be as simple as the Consequence of ignorance or the Consequence of being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The world is shaped by the Consequences of those before us! The implication of karma or sin suggests we deserve the world we live in. Does not sit well!

Morality is survival of the ethnic group. It's absolute. It's cross-cultural and cross-species. Peak morality is peak tribal intergenerational fertility - not just more babies for yourself, but for your people and descendants too.

However, this does not produce a universal moral code, only an instinctive ethnic conscience. Stealing isn't "wrong" for the nigger any more than it is for the seagull. Murdering antelopes is wrong for antelopes, not for lions.

This is not a "belief", it's a law of Nature. If other moralities exist, they are subsumed by populations more closely following evolutionary morality. Feminist societies are always doomed, slated to return to true morality or be conquered by those who do, without fail, even if it takes over a century.

Moral systems other than evolution are just inferior mutations of the pure drive to survive.

Our entire sense of White right and wrong is based on the best way for group survival in a harsh environment filled with exclusively other Whites.

You’re still combining philosophy and sophistry here. If objective morality exists (it does), one’s personal opinion of its existence is irrelevant. “Do you believe” is the wrong way to contextualize the question.

“Objective mortality exists; why don’t people recognize and adhere to it?”

The answer, of course, is that modern society allows them to temporarily abdicate the responsibility (and avoid the consequences) of denying it… in direct exchange for physical pleasure.

Because people have forgotten about God and turned to trust in money and material possessions to save them.

Literally one of the oldest stories in the book.

The internet is normalizing evil. Their souls are being corrupted by the evil they consoom.

Yes because subjective morality could never be useful for building a society. There needs to be at least a consensus of law for there to be order and the acceptance of absolute / objective morality is the only way.

I just saw a China woman biting a living cat on twitter.
 
China people draw energy from the pain of others, they are soulless. This is absolutely morally wrong.