New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
117
posted 2 years ago by CulturalPhilistine on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +117Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
2 years ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
> one of the politicians are truly "liberal" in the classical definition of the word

Oh yes they are. The original definition is based on the French Revolution and the works of Locke and Rousseau and the rest of the Enlightenment.

Every society which is based on the famous *social contract* is, by definition, liberal. The spit of "classical liberalism" vs government intervention is much further down, as it's two different means to pursue the same liberal goals (e.g. maximizing individual prosperity). But fascism is on a completely different tree branch.

> As someone who used to be fairly libertarian, this is actually a good case for fascism. Libertarians are just as idealistic as communists. In reality, neither work.

You must not try to think of the ideal system of government in abstract. You must think of what we need right now, considering the situation we are in.
I want National Socialism because it's the only way to get rid of Jews and shitskins. If we were only White people living in this country then I would be much more liberal.
Toast message