Chad fascist fencer vs virgin antifa fag
(media.communities.win)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
This makes no fucking sense.
We live in liberal democracy, not under fascism.
And even if we lived under fascism, that wouldn't mean that fascism is not the solution! You sound like a libtard who tries to think of a good system in abstract. What that matters is who is in charge. Fascism under the Jews would be bad, fascism under White people would be good. Communism under the Jews would be bad, communism under White people would be good. That's all there is to it. What that matters is who is in charge.
The reason fascism is the solution is because *from the current situation* you can escape only with a fascist takeover of power like Mussolini's, because there is no other way we can gain control of the institutions that have real power (media and finance) without black shirts going to corporate offices with guns and brass knuckles.
But the elections are fake, none of the politicians are truly "liberal" in the classical definition of the word, and none of your so-called representatives ever listen to a damn thing you say no matter how many times you write letters or call their office.
>The reason fascism is the solution is because from the current situation you can escape only with a fascist takeover of power like Mussolini's, because **there is no other way we can gain control of the institutions that have real power (media and finance) without black shirts going to corporate offices with guns and brass knuckles.**
As someone who used to be fairly libertarian, this is actually a good case for fascism. Libertarians are just as idealistic as communists. In reality, neither work.
Oh yes they are. The original definition is based on the French Revolution and the works of Locke and Rousseau and the rest of the Enlightenment.
Every society which is based on the famous *social contract* is, by definition, liberal. The spit of "classical liberalism" vs government intervention is much further down, as it's two different means to pursue the same liberal goals (e.g. maximizing individual prosperity). But fascism is on a completely different tree branch.
> As someone who used to be fairly libertarian, this is actually a good case for fascism. Libertarians are just as idealistic as communists. In reality, neither work.
You must not try to think of the ideal system of government in abstract. You must think of what we need right now, considering the situation we are in.
I want National Socialism because it's the only way to get rid of Jews and shitskins. If we were only White people living in this country then I would be much more liberal.