Chad fascist fencer vs virgin antifa fag
(media.communities.win)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
First of all: the proper use of the term "fascism" is to indicate Mussolini's political ideology. Nothing else. Hitler was not a fascist. National Socialism is not fascism, although they do share a lot of things.
Your problem is that you approach politics from an economic perspective, accepting all the liberal ideological framework that our society currently operates in. You're like a horse with blinkers. Fascism is a completely different way of looking at the world. The culture is what drives economics, not viceversa.
Under fascism corporations are expected to do the good of society. Which means that fascism rejects the class conflict that is core of both communism and capitalism. Fascism brings together the employers, workers, and the State to find a commonly beneficial outcome. Hence corporations are not allowed to exploit either consumers or workers.
> fascism suddenly becomes good if white people are in power and, knowing how backstabbing white people can be, I am not convinced that a white nationalist fascist would not sell out behind the scenes to the very same jew central bank system that effectively rules today.
Fascism is much, much superior to our current system of liberal democracy for 2 distinct and important reasons:
1) The culture of cooperation, rather than individualism and self-interest, is what makes the entire society running smooth. You cannot think of a way to organize society if you don't think of its culture. You make a big error in trying to think of the best system in the current culture. White people are the least backstabbing of all, by far. In fact it can be argued that a society with true solidarity and selfless can only be achieved by the pure Nordic race. And this is why I am a National Socialist. You can't apply National Socialism to niggers.
2) The power centralized in the hands of a fascist leader means that there's one person or one party with **responsibility**. The current system is a terrible system where the government blames parliament, each party blames each other, each voter blames the voters of the other party, etc. Meanwhile the *real power* is wielded by the media, with no accountability.
We live in the worst possible system that has ever existed, where an unknown elite of media and financial powers take all decisions without any accountability, politicians being useless disposable puppets.
If Mussolini had opened his country's border like Biden is doing now his head would have been on a spike.
I think i agree with most of what you say save for the case that we live in the absolute worst system. Surely, to be born in America is preferable to other places in the world in the 21st century.
> Under fascism corporations are expected to do the good of society. Which means that fascism rejects the class conflict that is core of both communism and capitalism. Fascism brings together the employers, workers, and the State to find a commonly beneficial outcome.
But then we get back to the same dilemma. Who gets to decide what is "commonly beneficial" ? You get the same elites hijacking and redefining what the "greater good" is.
Also, speaking of your national socialism as a solution is all null and void if jews own the central banking system. So how does a banking system work in your vision of a better nation?
In fascism you don't get any "elite", and nobody hijacks nothing. Why? Because in fascism no power is allowed to exist outside of the Party. Mussolini even forbade secret associations. There's no lobbies, sect, pressure groups, etc. and especially no different ethnicities with their own distinct interests. Even homos are forbidden because LGBT is a political group.
In fascism the Party decides everything. The advantage is that everything is done openly, with the population knowing exactly what is going on and why. Nothing is done secretly or surreptitiously. It is therefore, a more "democratic" form of government because the Party must follow the will of the masses to stay in charge. The Party takes its members from the people, so anyone who wishes to change the direction of the government can become a party member.
Fascism is right wing; meaning that the direction of the government depends on meritocracy and strength, not that everyone with a pulse has equal political power, which is an abomination.
Image that things were decided with a big riot on the streets. Us White Supremacists would go there in force, beat the shit out of antifa because we're stronger, and then be in charge.
In the current system, it's about how many women and weaklings you can convince to put a tick in your box.
> Also, speaking of your national socialism as a solution is all null and void if jews own the central banking system. So how does a banking system work in your vision of a better nation?
With National Socialism the Jews are removed from all positions of power. That's also why I'm a National Socialist (which is racially based) and not a fascist (that is more civic nationalist, although Mussolini's Italy was very homogeneous with very few Jews).
In National Socialism the banking system is based on issuing currency backed by labor. Which means that the monetary base is not inflated on a whim, but is expanded as the economy produces more real tangible output.
In any case I don't think there's a problem with the current banking system. I mean, the problem is that is in the hands of people who hate us, but there's nothing wrong with central banking per se.