New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Eurofags don't need to read this, because they can't understand it.

Niggers and kikes probably SHOULD read this, because it explains what is coming sooner than you realize.

If you read the Declaration of Independence, it declares to the world our sentiment on rebellion and sovereignty. In short, we declare, unequivocally, that God has endowed us with certain rights, and we refuse to negotiate about that. If you disagree about it, we will shoot you and laugh about it afterwards. We do not justify our rights, we just assert that "God said so" and that's that.

MAN, read, Anglo-Saxon men, have put their trust in government, but on a conditional basis. That condition is simply this: We'll tolerate corruption as long as we can tolerate it. But once we can't tolerate it anymore -- we will "alter or abolish" the government. Governments over us would do well to pay attention to this. We are FINE living in any system of government as long as we can tolerate it.

But "alter or abolish" -- how do we do it?

We start shooting people, basically.

But Anglo-Saxon men do things a little differently. See, the French formed committees and had public executions and such. We don't do things that way because we see it as barbaric and corrupt. No, we do it our own way.

Let me explain the way we do it.

Step 1: A leader steps forward.

Step 2: The leader summons the militia. The "militia" for Anglo-Saxon men are all able-bodied adult men who have their own arms. Hence, the "right to bear arms" is fundamental to who we are. We "bear arms" so that we can answer the summon.

Step 3: The militia is organized by the leader. Meaning, people are put in charge, given rank and title, and delegated responsibility. We'll even make our own flags and uniforms. We'll keep a list of who answered the summons and who did not.

Step 4: The militia declares what laws will be enforced and how, performs their own trials and punishes people on their own. So, if there's a corrupt government official living among us, we'll put them on trial, and that trial will be run likely by officers in the militia. We'll go through the standard motions of a trial, allow the accused to defend themselves, maybe even give them a lawyer to help them maximize their chances. But in the end, if we find them guilty, we'll punish them accordingly.

This is the foundation of ALL American law and justice and freedoms. Fundamentally, the political power is invested in the "people" meaning the militia and the people who are able to summon the militia. When the militia is active, no one does anything except the militia approves.

Now, suppose we actually mobilized the militia. What would the government do? Obviously, they'd try to put it down as a form of insurrection. Insurrection against what, exactly? It certainly is not treason against the people -- as if people can commit treason against themselves. It's awfully hard to put people on trial for treason when you need a jury to convict -- and all the members of the jury are members of the militia.

Maybe the government will send in the troops. They'd have to find troops not made up of the militia, so they'd need foreign troops or mercenaries. Sure, go ahead, let's have that battle. If we can't defeat foreign armies and mercenaries then we're not much of a militia, are we? Note that militias typically engage only in defensive battles. Rarely do militias take the offense. I think back to the battle for Boston in the Revolution as an example of how the militia might take the offense. Mostly, the militia will probably set up camp and just do their own policing and whatnot through their delegated authorities.

You can see why the government is all but powerless to put down such an "insurrection."

Anyway, once the militia is summoned, the order of events following the summoning work something like this. After all, the militia will want to go home at some point.

MARTIAL LAW. The militia declares the law and declares the government null and void. They execute all the laws and justice and are judge, jury and executioner. No one can escape their judgments since they are in fact all of the able-bodied adult men and carry all the guns.

TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT. The militia will probably allow elections according to their rules to allow the people (READ: able-bodied adult males) to choose their local governments. This government would probably form some sort of parliament or congress with authority to write laws and a constitution. With this, the militia might temporarily disband. If the temporary government doesn't do things right, though, expect them to show up all of a sudden and start putting people on trial again.

INITIAL ELECTION. At some point the temporary government will propose a new constitution, or perhaps the old constitution but with new leadership. Elections are held, overseen by the temporary government, and these elected people form the actual, "permanent" government.

Now, a lot of so-called "Americans" are hoping that the government will fix itself. This is an absurd idea. The people who are corrupt and need to be purged will never purge themselves. Nor will they allow people who will purge them to do so either. The constitution itself does not contain the mechanism to reset itself or invalidate itself. That's because the constitution is not based on itself, but based on the will of the "people" (read: able-bodied adult males.) Thus, it is up to the "people" to revoke the constitution or re-establish it, according to their will.

Now, to the anglo-saxon man living in the US: Get ready to answer the summons. Get your gear together. Not just rifles and ammo but camping gear and survival gear. When you are summoned you'll probably be asked to leave your home for several months at least. Get your family ready to manage themselves in your absence.

If you are the sort of person who can summon the militia, it is imperative that you learn all of the skills such a leader would need. You NEED to understand how anglo-saxon men organize and establish themselves. Robert's Rules of Order, that sort of thing, as well as a clear understanding of what rights are and how they work as well as what the "Natural Law" is and how you are going to enforce it. Read Locke if you need to. Go back to our founding history to understand things.

If you are a foreigner living here in the US, and by that I mean you are not anglo-saxon, then you have to decide whether you want to join us and become anglo-saxon or not. If not -- then depart in peace. Go find somewhere else to live, or accept the fact that you will always be inconsequential. If you want to become anglo-saxon, then learn our ways and start acting like an anglo-saxon man.
17
posted 3 days ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror )
24
posted 4 days ago by SNES_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +24Score on mirror )
25
All the same to them (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by MLJFireDragon747 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +25Score on mirror )
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) is a United States federal law enacted on July 18, 2025, which establishes the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The act defines a payment stablecoin as a digital asset designed to be used as a means of payment or settlement, where the issuer is obligated to redeem it for a fixed amount of monetary value, typically a U.S. dollar, ensuring a stable value relative to a fixed benchmark. To qualify as a stablecoin under the law, these digital assets must be fully backed one-for-one by high-quality, liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or Treasuries, making them redeemable on demand.
The GENIUS Act creates a dual federal and state supervision system, allowing entities to choose between federal or state regulation, though state regulation is limited to those with a stablecoin issuance of $10 billion or less. Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers are approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), while state-qualified issuers must be authorized by a state payment stablecoin regulator. The primary federal payment stablecoin regulator is determined by the issuer’s entity type, with the OCC overseeing federal qualified issuers. The act also establishes the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee, composed of the Treasury Secretary, the FDIC Chair, and the Federal Reserve Chair, to certify state regulatory regimes as substantially similar to the federal framework and to approve foreign regulatory regimes for international issuers.
The law aims to strengthen consumer protection, foster responsible innovation, and bolster the U.S. dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency by closing a longstanding regulatory gap in the issuance and custody of stablecoin reserves. It also seeks to mitigate financial stability and illicit finance risks, with the U.S. Department of the Treasury issuing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in September 2025 to solicit public comment on implementing regulations related to anti-money laundering (AML) obligations, BSA compliance, tax issues, and the balance between federal and state oversight. The Treasury had previously issued a Request for Comment in August 2025 to gather insights on detecting illicit activity involving digital assets.
Critics, including the nonprofit organization Consumer Reports, argue that the act does not provide sufficient consumer protection and allows large technology companies to engage in bank-like activities without being subject to the same stringent regulations as traditional banks. Despite this, the GENIUS Act is seen as a landmark moment for the U.S. cryptocurrency industry, potentially enabling widespread adoption of stablecoins in traditional finance and payments, and encouraging international harmonization, such as with Canada, where stablecoins are currently classified as securities or derivatives, unlike the U.S. classification as payment instruments. The act may also disrupt traditional payment systems by offering instant settlement, programmability, and lower costs, potentially reducing the $187 billion in annual merchant fees.
11
posted 3 days ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
posted 3 days ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
66
Damaging (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by diogenesofthearch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +66Score on mirror )
imagine how much worse shit would be if we were still on 1980's technology. i mean it's used against everyone (who isnt privileged) but still
41
NYC Is Fake and Gay (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by Heliocentric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +41Score on mirror )
posted 3 days ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
posted 3 days ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
62
It's just race. (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by Zrupsloohg on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +62Score on mirror )
"Cremation" entry in Catholic Encyclopedia: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04481c.htm

> By the fifth century of the Christian Era, owing in great part to the rapid progress of Christianity, the practice of cremation had entirely ceased.

> The Christians never burned their dead, but followed from earliest days the practice of the Semitic race and the personal example of their Divine Founder. It is recorded that in times of persecution many risked their lives to recover the bodies of martyrs for the holy rites of Christian burial. The pagans, to destroy faith in the resurrection of the body, often cast the corpses of martyred Christians into the flames, fondly believing thus to render impossible the resurrection of the body. What Christian faith has ever held in this regard is clearly put by the third-century writer Minucius Felix, in his dialogue "Octavius", refuting the assertion that cremation made this resurrection an impossibility: "Nor do we fear, as you suppose, any harm from the [mode of] sepulture, but we adhere to the old, and better, custom" ("Nec, ut creditis, ullum damnum sepulturae timemus sed veterem et meliorem consuetudinem humandi frequentamus" — P.L., III, 362).
31
Gins-berg (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by diogenesofthearch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
19
No the other one. (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by SnakePlisken1776 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +19Score on mirror )
26
posted 4 days ago by Uncle_Adolf on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +26Score on mirror )
31
I Hate Coomers (media.scored.co)
posted 4 days ago by Heliocentric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
15
posted 4 days ago by SNES_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror )
92
posted 4 days ago by USSDefiantJazz on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +92Score on mirror )
40
posted 4 days ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +40Score on mirror )
36
posted 4 days ago by SNES_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
21
posted 4 days ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +21Score on mirror )
Toast message