Consume Product

I was talking to him at a family dinner, and he was wearily bemoaning how *wrong* the world feels everywhere you look. Though expecting it not to land, I immediately replied with my candid monologue about "Well the reason you feel like that is because you are a hated minority in your own country," and he suddenly cuts in with—

"Yeah, no, I'm like—a White supremacist, straight up. Anyone who isn't White is genetically inferior."

Less than two years ago he was rejecting the notion of blacks having lower IQ, and claiming any race could have ended up with any culture, just luck of the draw and geography (Whites could have very easily turned out with Asian culture and vice versa, etc.)

I don't know what caused the wheel to turn between then and now, but it did. I'm sure he's not fully redpilled yet—still pretty consoom-heavy, pothead. Might not know the JQ.

I told him I was gonna show him a podcast, and want to send him some Blackpilled episodes. Any thoughts for good ones in his position? I'm thinking Hollywoodism and Patcon series, but the latter is dense. Best to draw in the zoom-zoom attention span with smaller ones first.

Watching Trump flounder because of the lawfare being waged against his agenda, it's time to remember what the US justice system should look like, at least if anyone bothered to care what the constitution actually says (they don't.)

The courts are supposed to be the weakest of the 3 branches of government. The SC can only hear cases that are listed in the constitution and whatever else the congress wants them to hear. The other courts are organized by congress and can only hear cases that congress wants them to hear. Courts can only say "yes" or "no" and that's pretty much it.

The law trumps the constitution for the courts. Period. If the law is unconstitutional, then the only way to correct it is civil disobedience or fixing congress. An infringement upon our God-given rights is not addressed at the Supreme Court or any other court. It is handled with violence or voting, period. Congress has gotten away with violating our liberties for way too long, and they hide behind the "oh we don't have a majority!" nonsense. I'm sorry, if there are people subverting our rights in congress, they need to be put out of congress immediately, and if they are welcomed in, then congress is to blame. There is NO civility with people who do not respect fundamental rights.

The president enforces the law, however he sees fit, period. If he wants to be a tyrant, so be it. No one can second-guess his interpretation of the laws. The reason WHY we have a president at all is because we need a government that takes action without second-guessing and armchair generals. It's necessary for our survival. He is MEANT to be a dictator, and he should act like it from time to time.

When it comes to criminal actions, then the constitution guarantees a trial by jury of their peers. If the jury won't convict, there is nothing the president, congress, or the courts can do, period.

For civil cases (lawsuits, etc) then the constitution lists what sort of trial is necessary. Maybe bump up the dollar value of the suit before requiring a jury.

For things that aren't criminal or civil, such as invasions, there are no courts or laws. It is war or at best foreign policy. The president dictates the action and no one can second-guess him.

Certain crimes should be punishable by death, to be administered almost immediately following the verdict. Sorry not sorry if we screw it up. These crimes are so severe that we can't afford to second-guess the jury. You won't need lynchings if we had the death penalty enforced properly.

Criminals should not be put in prison. Punish them according to their crime. If they hurt someone and can't make restitution, then they become a slave until their debt is paid. If they are too much of a burden, then just put them to death when they commit a capital offense. Most of our problems disappear once we start executing violent criminals. The rest of the problems disappear when we enslave people with sticky fingers.

For all other cases, the people can enforce the law on their own. The police shouldn't be the first line of defense. In fact, they shouldn't be there at all. If you want to protect yourself, carry a gun and use it. If you have to take out a gang, find the sheriff and summon a posse and ride at dawn and blast them to smithereens. If they surrender, maybe put them on trial if you are feeling generous. Otherwise, bury them and be done with it.

In fact, allow citizens to be the prosecutor. They show up to court with the evidence and witnesses, the court summons the accused, and you have a trial then and there, no messing around. Why people expect the government to do everything for them and then expect good to come of it is beyond me!

Our current system is so far removed from the original system the Founding Fathers designed and implemented that it's not even comparable.

Most, if not all issues in this world, whether personal or on a societal level, whether a pet peeve or global threats, come from somewhere, specifically as a result of an action someone or something else has taken.

The reason we live in consistent clown world for about 80 years, and things are getting worse, is because the lemmings have been brainwashed to not see cause and effect. Everything is some abstraction, some metaphysical concept that causes the problem, a concept that cannot inherently be tied to a trigger. For example

>europe has been having a rape problem lately

>haha americans play call of duty in school ha ha

>capitalism makes people into work drones and kills their individuality

>there is "institutional racism"

>the internet is full of spam bots

This is how the lemming sees the world. To him, it is just one big abstraction, concepts just materialize and cause problems on their own. That's why he loves democracy, it appeals to his ego. It gives him a sense of power and belonging among the other lemmings.

Let's say that the lemming is wrong. If things do happen for a reason, and then let's see if the reasons i find are correct, by comparing the time when the problems are a thing, to the time when they were not.

>europe has been having a rape problem lately

That is correct, it is because of the very large scale mass immigration of non-whites, specifically browns/blacks, into europe. They are much more predisposed to such behaviors. Where's the evidence for this? Well, before mass immigration, rape was a much smaller problem, and the rates in europe, are proportional to the arrivals of migrants and the rates of their home countries.

>haha americans play call of duty in school ha ha

School shootings do happen more than in any other places, but they weren't an issue before say....1965? And guns have only been harder to get since then, so the guns certainly aren't an issue, especially since gun-free zones have high gun-related crime rates too. Actually, it turns out, if blacks and browns were removed from the statistics, america would have similar crime rates to most western, first world, european countries.

>capitalism makes people into work drones and kills their individuality

That is certainly the case. However it wasn't always like this, there were men like Henry Ford who wanted the best for their employees, times when people could afford a house on one salary. So the system is not the problem, it's clearly the people who are exploiting it...now what ethno-religious group exploits capitalism.....

>there is "institutional racism"

well there certainly is, but not in the way the lemming thinks. Anyway, they usually mean that it is against browns/blacks. That is to say they are being mass incarcerated, profiled, discriminated against and so forth. But could it simply be that they...commit more crime? Surely not, i mean surely america is just an evil country. What about the uk? france? where a lot of them have been flooding? surely there they are treated more fairly and-oh. It's because they commit the most crime isn't it. And how about their general prospects? Despite them being given DEI gibs...surely it can't be that they're fucking stupid. It must be that they're being discriminated against

>the internet is full of spam bots

yes, it is. However, it wasn't always like this. Now, what group of people has been extremely overrepresented in these spam bot farms, what group of people has gotten easier internet access lately. Could it be that it's just more indians being online and that they act like they are naturally inclined to act? No, surely it's the shadowy lines of code that make up the internet that let bots sneak through the cracks.

And that is why i like authoritarianism that uses its powers in the service of people like myself. A national sort of socialism. It doesn't care about appealing to the ego. It knows what is best, and strikes at the root cause of the problem to make life for the average man better. Until we start generalizing, until we can start seeing WHY problems happen, we can never fix them. It makes life much clearer, but much more frustrating when you see that everyone else just refuses to see it.

[Lack of Entertainment - Oblivion Is A Modern Game](https://youtu.be/dE8Azm1qitw)

> @chris5942 "[...] Sword/board/magic and running around in tunnels. That's it."

for all of its "arcane, obscure and complex lore", if i look at just the games and ignore the setting then yeah, that's it. run around in tunnel or open field. hit things with weapon or spell. rinse repeat.

is this what it feels like to lose interest in a hobby? or is this what it feels like to develop a refined taste and see past glories in new lights? either way, right in the nostalgia glands.

for me, it would be that crusader side wins the battle of Varna from 1444.


Winning the war would:
- stop ottoman expansion
- guarantee independence of balkan states
- give a chance for reconquest of Byzantine lands in places like Anatolia or Egypt
- secure the legitimacy of catholic church
- Poland would be even stronger as a strong catholic state in central europe which would have lasted for centuries.

It has taken a helluva lot longer for this than it should have. Apologies. That said; enjoy laying eyes on a book that, as far as I can tell, never left Academic/University libraries. It was uploaded this morning, 4/22/25.

o/

https://z-lib.fm/book/117130367/029587/the-economic-activities-of-the-jews-of-amsterdam-in-the-17th-and-18th-century.html

Someone was asking about hypertension the other day. Can’t find the original post. But if you’re curious here’s an important link btw ht and calcium—

Many studies have shown that dietary calcium (or vitamin D, which increases calcium absorption) can have very important antiinflammatory effects.
About 25 years ago, David McCarron noticed that the governments data on diet and hypertension showed that the people who ate the most salt had the lowest blood pressure, and those who ate the least salt had the highest pressure. He showed that a calcium deficiency, rather than a sodium excess, was the most likely nutritional explanation for hypertension.


Conclusion: drink more raw milk.

Info curtesy Ray Peat

Consume 'slop

I was always a guy who would have a lot of short-term friendships and relationships it's weird because once people got to know me they just-- I don't know something about me people just like me less and less as time goes on also. Another issue is I can tell that when strangers look at me in public they don't like my presence. Am I just not really an enjoyable person to be around? I literally hate everyone but family. Family is irreplaceable There's no such thing as friendship that is only for women. As a man you are on your own.