Consume Product

Monarchy requires a fundamentally good person at every level of power. The King, his advisors, his spares, his heirs, his powerful allies, his enforcers, his informants... everyone needs the purity of a saint to not abuse their power and keep the rest of the system from finding out.

If that many fundamentally good people existed we would not need societies and rulers.

Ideal monarchy is like ideal communism.

White farmers with shotguns don't need a king or communist nation state taxing them to feed niggers. White farmers with shotguns just need to do what is best for their race and community and nation. Be a Libertarian NatSoc. For us, freedom. For our enemies, everything they said Hitler was and worse.

Don't forget KING HENRY THE JEW.

That nigger made the anglican church so he can divorce his wife.

Christians/Catholics deserve credit for the Crusades uniting all these white lands but let's not fool ourselves... Christ is not enough of a check and balance on the Monarch's power.

And how do i guard against despondency and depression after stumbling? Is there a way to permanently end sin and sinning that i don't know about? Because i'm so very tired of trying as hard as i can, only to stumble and fall again. I hate it, in fact. I hate this sin and this sinning.

Please pray for me, a weak sinner. Glory to God, amen.

The foundation of the soviet union was predicated upon Russia's failure to properly industrialize and their disastrous campaigns in the Russo japanese war and ww1 that left most of the population alienated from the tsar and his nobility. Yes, it was agitated by jews. They would not have been able to agitate anyone at all, however, if there were no issues to begin with. Severe issues. A large contingent of the white army was even anti-tsarist, the feeling of discontent was not strictly among the political left. Even if there weren't a single jew in russia's borders, *something* was going to happen that would not have been good for the monarchy. Maybe it would have ended up being the second xinhai revolution, who knows

What did this do for the right, then?

It was a wake-up call. By the 1920s when the bolsheviks consolidated control over the soviet union, the west was already under the jewish yoke ourselves. Just a yoke of a different variety.

Before the establishment of the USSR, the mantra for the right in opposition to globalism and jewish capitalism was, effectively, just to support reactionary monarchist political parties that had no real solutions, little popular support, and were not getting anywhere.

The USSR opened up the floodgates for new revolutionary theory to enter the right wing consciousness. Marxist (heterodox) scholars and monarchist ideologues alike started to work together and cooperate to develop new ideas to challenge the hegemony that enveloped the world, lest it fall under the dominance of leninism due to a lack of action, or remain much the same under traditional jewish finance.

And thus, thanks to the wake-up call that was the USSR's existence. We found answers. We found solutions. We overtook the political and economic paradigm of the age and challenged reaction, capitalism, liberalism, and communism all the same. And we were winning.

What happened to it? It was destroyed because it could not be allowed to exist by the jewry in charge of the 2 halves of the world. What was originally a European ideology only continued to exist in the middle east until the collapse of syria, and by some extent it somewhat exists in china and north korea today, too, but this is debatable.

What is to be done? People will need to be propagandized, and they must be propagandized properly. They must maintain their politicization to not lose faith in the movement and to continue to press on and persevere. Only through understanding the theory that gave rise to our movement will any proper governance of a revolutionary movement, and later on, a state, be achieved. So they must be educated. They must be educated on the works of Sorel, Hitler, Mussolini, Codreanu, Proudhon, Maurras, even Hegel, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates. They must also be educated in the theories of others. Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, etc. Adam Smith, Friedman, Hayek, Hoppe, Rand (ugh), etc on the opposite side. There is no harm in understanding the beliefs and theories of your enemies, this can only work in your favor. And they are also successful for a reason, so there's something to be learned in their writing while disagreeing with them.

Only through building a well educated mass movement, predicated upon violence, can any change be something that is possible.

Think about it.

Lions does not bite animals through their skulls and warrior nogs tend to spear the other nog through the chest or guts (causing internal bleeding). It's to survive being clocked.