Consume Product

I only read a summary but it sounds like the predicted writing of tautologies sprinkled with anti-Catholic jabs:

-anti-war passages and attacks Catholic just war theory

(Why this is a problem: It's fine to be against wars and for peace in practice, but in theory the idea of a "Just War" came from the right to individual self-defense, applied to the collective of the people. The encyclical - according to the summary I saw - suggested war was "always wrong". This would be an error, or it is a revolutionary change that the "pope" is trying to make to Catholicism)

from the doc: "it is important to reaffirm that the 'just war' theory, which has all too often been used to justify any kind of war, is now outdated."

-attacks colonialism without explaining why Christians created colonies

(Why this is a problem: Christians believed "savages" were in danger of eternal damnation and so were willing to go to strong lengths to spread the Gospel to non-Christians. So any of the worst things that happened under "colonialism" should be considered in light of the concern they had for people who they thought were at risk of damnation forever)

-brings up historical attitudes towards slavery to freshly try to make Catholicism look bad

(Why this is a problem: many people have already "apologized" for past wrongdoings. This is purely an attempt to "guilt trip")

Hoping more people wake up to how opposed these people are to Catholic beliefs and practices (a minority of us believe "Leo" is definitely not a Catholic pope because of these obvious attacks on Catholicism)

They literally have low T, small cocks, bugs for food, and their women are fleshlights for us White men. I would rather be a nigger than be Asian

I actually love my air fryer. So simple to cook and clean things. They do a decent job at mimicking some of the crisp of frying (though, not quite as good).

What's the best air fryer to buy for alt-right safety concerns. I hear a lot of the materials used in air fryers are really bad for you. Plastics, chemical compounds which may breakdown on the non-stick surfaces, etc...

Any ideas on which is the safest air fryer to use?

Consider helping him and his family out on give send go.
https://www.givesendgo.com/dugan-ashley-defense-fund

He has a huge video series covering advanced homemade explosives.
https://odysee.com/@DuganAshley:e

Situation summary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixSK8MuAcPY

> Jacob Frank claimed to be a reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi and followed and extended his practice of transgression.

> Father-daughter incest was commonly practised by his followers, and orgies featured prominently in ritual

> The Frankists engaged in incest, orgies and sex rituals

> Frankists were encouraged to convert en masse to Catholicism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankism

It seems like no matter what disgusting filthy crime you commit, cuckold christians will simply turn a blind eye if you COONVERT. What a thoroughly retarded religion, no wonder it's completely subverted except for a handful of nobodies on here.

I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it
♪
I'm losing it

My perception is that wages have stagnated due to active suppression methods in the USA as the boomer generation had higher wages as adjusted for inflation, while productivity gains have been made via technological developments so there should be more money available to pay workers higher wages

So my question is about how to raise wages?

Frequently I'm seeing people on the right (maybe mostly older people?) argue for regular workers to be paid less in wages you can't live independently on, while I sometimes hear stories of older people who were able to raise families on simple jobs

My understanding is that a lot of the extra profits have gone to shareholders and CEOs, that could have gone to workers, to keep wage rates up

A couple thought experiments come to mind to visualize this, like thinking about a small business owner who pockets all the profits from his business, versus an employee at a similar business who is paid a wage at a much smaller rate - while there is more risk that that owner takes than the employee, the "mere" ownership of the business yields a higher pay rate. (Some corporations that take loans on money printed out of thin air that they can get bailed out on by the public if they go bust, do not even take the "ownership risk" that many identify as the justification for lower wages for workers and higher rates paid out to CEOs / shareholders)

So, I guess one answer to how to increase "wages" is for people to be business owners

A second answer is to encourage more people to become the shareholders who are getting lots of the profits from these businesses, I guess

Could more money simply be paid out to workers from the monies that are going to CEOs / shareholders?

A second visualization experiment is that of American factory workers being paid good living wages, and of these jobs being "outsourced" to some other country at lower wage rates; the profits again from this move, must be going to shareholders and CEOs of the company, whereas before they were going to American workers

So the idea that the "hands are tied" of businesses and they must pay below "living wages" isn't really a set in stone argument, as seemingly in the above manufacturing job example they could have just "paid more" to keep the jobs with American workers

Another problem with some of this discussion is a back and forth appeal to some "objective" wage rate, versus the subjective theory of value in capitalism; in other words, frequently wages and prices are set just arbitrarily based on what people want. Ergo, it's equally as "rational" in a "free market" to argue that workers ought to minimally be paid $30/hour as it is to argue that they should be paid $5/hour - just like you could argue CEOs should only be paid maybe 10x that of the average worker versus 300x (which is where it is about at in 2026).

I suppose the other part of this discussion is that "wages" don't necessarily need to increase, so much as we need effective secondary investment schemes so that people can grow even small wages into larger sums of money to pay for their needs. It's possible for people to make investments that see returns much beyond wage rates they can work for. However, I don't see why we couldn't do both: increase wages as well as leverage investments.

So anyway, I was curious about what could be done to raise wages in society or if you think this is a desirable goal or if some secondary or other goal might be focused on to generate wealth and prosperity generally in society

edit: a quick AI discussion led to a conclusion of two main drivers of wage increases:

1) productivity gains. This directly increases the monies or value available to distribute.

2) ownership of capital. This gives you the ultimate claim - in part or totally - to the productivity gains produced.

Maybe a lot of the rest of the discussion is edge cases around these