Consume Product

Every day I see articles of someone (98% of the time a black) doing some heinous crime. You have too. A black working at a daycare horribly assaulting a young child. A black at an elderly care facility bodyslamming a 90 year old. Etc etc. I've posted quite a few of the headline captures here.

Comments sections online are a treasure trove of insight. You'll have the rare black comment justifying or explaining away the heinous act. "maybe dat yt toddler deserved it" to be hit with a stapler by, at the age of 2.

Most comments at least agree that the actions of the groid in question are bad. But most of them fall so short of the anger these acts should illicit.

"She should be fired."

"She should never work in childcare again."

"I can't believe it happened so many times before someone did something about it."

Fired? Reprimanded? That's it? Aside from the obvious that any groid will just get fired and go right back into the EBT line, why is merely firing them the gut response? Why don't people demand that heads roll? Has the west become SO neutered that we can't even fathom severe/martial punishment?

I could understand "the internet is forever" and not wanting to say something incriminating, but there are ways to say it without saying it, otherwise why comment at all? And even man on the street type things have shown many women when asked "would you kill to save your child?" do not kneejerk say "yes". In fact, many outright say no.

Tolerance is a weakness.

Looking the other way is weakness.

These are not things anyone should aspire towards.

Demand more from your peers. When you spot weakness like that, call it out. Push them to justify their position. Iron out the weakness from your friends and family, but most importantly our/yourselves.

I was thinking about niggers and how they can't entertain hypotheticals ("how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?"), and as I walked my dog I thought the question is too mundane to even answer. The stupid answer would be "I'd be hungry", but actually it depends. What if you didn't eat because you weren't hungry? You'd feel nothing unusual. Would I rank the same as a nigger solely because I didn't give the good boy answer?

So I wanted to ask you a hypothetical, that is a bit more sophisticated. Let's say WWII did break out, but the US didn't intervene because they didn't get an excuse to do so via Pearl Harbor. That didn't happen, Germany and Japan would be just friends and not officially allies. France was defeated, Britain agreed to peace, and the Soviet Union was successfully averted using Sarin gas as a threat to not attack Germany. Germany didn't march eastward, so the territory they had was Germany and its former territories prior to WWI (half of Poland) and Austria. The situation stabilized, the strains of WWII were significant. Let's say nukes got invented by the US and Germany, and the Soviets (through jewish spies) managed to build them later on too.

So the hypothetical: **How would the world develop over the next century?** What would we see today? What about feminism, leftism, big corporations ran by jews, media ran by jews, LLMs, corporate culture, the economy? What would be the best-case scenario, the worst-case scenario and/or the average-case scenario?

I would like to hear what you think about this.