Consume Product

The Second Vatican Council movement has had "popes" that seem to directly attack previous Catholic teaching; I expect this will resolve to the council being rejected as a false council like the "robber council" of Second Council of Ephesus, as well as the papal claimants being declared invalid or "not popes" since that time.

"Sportsball" Analogy

The analogy would be like if, since the world cup of soccer is going on soon, FIFA - the governing body for soccer - had a meeting and decided something absurd like every goal was worth 3 points instead of 1 point. Some people might accept that this is "true soccer" and some "legitimate change to the game". Others would denounce the organization and set up their own leagues to preserve "traditional soccer", and declare the FIFA leadership has no "true authority", and that the meeting deciding on 3 goals has no "binding authority" on "true soccer fans". Something like that has happened to create "traditional Catholicism" in contrast to this mainstream "Vatican 2 'Catholicism'".

Are Catholics "Autonomous"?

Section 20 of the new "encyclical" by "Leo XIV" reads:

> The Second Vatican Council expressed this principle with particular precision in the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, whose sixtieth anniversary we remembered and celebrated with gratitude on 7 December 2025: “If by the autonomy of earthly affairs is meant that created things and societies themselves enjoy their own laws and values… then the demand for autonomy is perfectly in order.”

I don't believe this is the former Catholic teaching on "autonomy"; man is not "autonomous" but subject to God's laws. Autonomy would be a "license to sin": you could set your own "law" that it is ok to do this or that thing contrary to Catholic teaching. This is therefore the wrong understanding of "autonomy", and they are ambiguous about what they mean by "true autonomy" (which would be a "freedom within limits"; much like in Genesis, Adam and Eve had total liberty to eat from whatever tree, except for that of the tree which yielded "forbidden fruit").

I believe the document contains more errors like this, continuing this heretical movement of modernism.

 Jews brought slaves to America. Jews owned the slave auction houses and over 80% of Jews were slave owners.

  But the Jews got white men to kill white men to free niggers. Then they loaned the money to the respective governments to fund the war

  Oh how they must have laughed and patted themselves on the back. Watching the Goyim kill themselves while paying the Jew for the weapons to do it with. Over niggers

  The Jews won the civil war. America and Caucasians lost

Edit and A quick thanks for the engaging replies, with the exception to the closeted homosexual Jew and his weird sexual projections. This could make a decent article if I can find the proof in old papers and books