Christianity

The Dig - The Significant Claim of the Resurrection - Stephen Pidgeon with Jessica Knock, John Barr, and Dale Potts [1.45.15]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5cVew83gGk&t=100s
When we speak of the teaching of scripture, many doctrines can be readily explained in both the Old and New Testaments. In fact, the Cepher Chazon (Book of Revelation) is a running set of citations from the Old Testament on a verse by verse basis - sometimes capturing whole chapters in a single verse.
Yet one doctrine emerges from the New Testament that is simply not found in the Old Testament, and two doctrines which emerge outside the edges of the Tanakh. It is of some interest that the phrase "Holy Spirit" appears only three times in the KJV version of the Old Testament - once in the Psalms, and twice in Isaiah (Yesha'yahu); yet the very idea suffered rejection by the Sadducees. The idea of "angels" as opposed to simple messengers was also a concept rejected by the Sadducees.
However, the doctrine that simply does not appear at all in the Old Testament is the doctrine concerning the resurrection. What exactly is this claim? How was it established? What does it mean for us?
Let's see if we can dig into the "why" of this question tonight on the Dig.

Walter Veith & Martin Smith - Davos: WEF Kings & Merchants Implemented The New World Order [1.21.25]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwz4tPlOYs0
In Episode 150 we discuss the recent meeting held by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. Numerous heads of state, government ministers, Al Gore, John Kerry along with big corporation CEO's like Larry Fink of BlackRock, the FBI Director Christopher Wray, and many other dignitaries took part in the event. During the sessions the speakers plainly stated their plans for the world, and the order of things. But is all this talk of implementing a new order something new, or does it have an earlier and darker origin?

Moses Staff and Joseph's Coat with Dr. Stephen Pidgeon, Zen Garcia & Jessica Knock - Eatin Wild Honey and Locusts [1.33.21]
https://www.brighteon.com/90958da5-49b5-4e32-8fcd-e24d1ecfed3f
Interwoven into the story of Adam and Eve's fall from grace, an account of the garments of power made to clothe them by Yahuah when exiling them from paradise. Another aspect of the tale alludes to the limb which Adam carried forth from the tree of life which in latter scriptures is described as the Rod of Wonders or Staff of Miracles. Given to Moses by Jethro when marrying Zipporah. Moses utilized this stave in parting the 'Red Sea' and bringing forth from the desert stone, the waters which satiated the thirst of Israel during their wanderings.
These two items can be placed through out the lives of the patriarchs, prophet and apostles of Israel and this series picks up on their supernatural importance not realized in mainstream Christianity.

Anti Christ Tech in the News | AI | Beast | Cloning | DNA war - SJWellFire [17.52]
https://rumble.com/v28dzd8-anti-christ-tech-in-the-news-ai-beast-cloning-dna-war.html
From an article, "Scientists believe they have found a way to bring back the animal most synonymous with the extinction, the dodo bird. Should their endeavor prove successful, this could open the door for the resurrection of several other animals (NIMROD) that were thought to be long gone." Gateway Pundant. How can this tech bring back NImrod and his tower of Babel Tech. Plus, another Nephilim dream. Bill Clinton press conference to slow down cloning.

> All writers on the spiritual life uniformly recommend, nay, command under penalty of total failure, the practice of silence. And yet, despite this there is perhaps no rule for spiritual advancement more inveighed against, by those who have not even mastered its rudiments, than that of silence. Even under the old Dispensation its value was known, taught, and practised. Holy Scripture warns us of the perils of the tongue, as "Death and life are in the power of the tongue" (Proverbs 18:21). Nor is this advice less insisted on in the New Testament; witness: "If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man" (St. James 3:2 sq.). The same doctrine is inculcated in innumerable other places of the inspired writings. The pagans themselves understood the dangers arising from unguarded speech. Pythagoras imposed a strict rule of silence on his disciples; the vestal virgins also were bound to severe silence for long years. Many similar examples could be quoted.
 
> Silence may be viewed from a threefold standpoint:
 
> 1. As an aid to the practice of good, for we keep silence with man, in order the better to speak with God, because an unguarded tongue dissipates the soul, rendering the mind almost, if not quite, incapable of prayer. The mere abstaining from speech, without this purpose, would be that "idle silence" which St. Ambrose so strongly condemns.
 
> 2. As a preventative of evil. Senica, quoted by Thomas à Kempis complains that "As often as I have been amongst men, I have returned less a man" (Imitation, Book I, c. 20).
 
> 3. The practice of silence involves much self-denial and restraint, and is therefore a wholesome penance, and as such is needed by all.
 
> From the foregoing it will be readily understood why all founders of religious orders and congregations, even those devoted to the service of the poor, the infirm, the ignorant, and other external works, have insisted on this, more or less severely according to the nature of their occupations, as one of the essential rules of their institutes. It was St. Benedict who first laid down the clearest and most strict laws regarding the observance of silence. In all monasteries, of every order, there are special places, called the "Regular Places" (church, refectory, dormitory etc.) and particular times, especially the night hours, termed the "Great Silence", wherein speaking is more strictly prohibited. Outside these places and times there are usually accorded "recreations" during which conversation is permitted, governed by rules of charity and moderation, though useless and idle words are universally forbidden in all times and places. Of course in active orders the members speak according to the needs of their various duties. It was perhaps the Cistercian Order alone that admitted no relaxation from the strict rule of silence, which severity is still maintained amongst the Reformed Cistercians (Trappists) though all other contemplative Orders (Carthusians, Carmelites, Camaldolese etc.) are much more strict on this point than those engaged in active works. In order to avoid the necessity of speaking, many orders (Cistercians, Dominicans, Discalced Carmelites etc.) have a certain number of signs, by means of which the religious may have a limited communication with each other for the necessities that are unavoidable.
 
Source: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13790a.htm