New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
36
posted 1 year ago by pkvi_eid on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Hate-machine on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I just explained to you the definitions. That is all the difference there is. You are playing into a jews game of semantics.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
The definitions you gave are also different. You don't have to be in an army to fight in war. You don't have to fight in war if you're in an army.
Hate-machine on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Neither of the definitions have anything to do with honour, or fighting independantly, or having a code, or ethics, or organisation, or goals. Beowolf and Hercules were both soldiers and warriors.

You are correct that they mean slightly different things. But it's semantics. In context they mean exactly the same thing. Any soldier that has seen action is a warrior, by definition. The vast vast vast majority of contemporary warriors, going back for generations, are soliders.
Toast message