New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
I must disagree, to a certain extent.


The purpose of debate is to come closer to truth. To have good debate, requires all parties to be logical, civil, honest, and prioritize truth above all else. Our enemies, and their brainwashed NPCs, are incapable of good debate, so what's the point? Bad debate can serve several constructive purposes.


1) It enables good men to rebuke falsehoods and lies directly and openly. This is one of our foundational responsibilities, to be good men, and to construct and maintain a healthy group, family, community, society, and civilization. As men, truth must be our highest philosophical priority. We can't allow falsehoods and lies to remain unchallenged in the public square, or in our midst. They must be challenged and destroyed.


2) It enables good men to speak truth to lies in front of an audience, which may contain members who haven't heard the truth. Do not forget that most of the institutions of this world are captured, and have done nothing but put forth an endless stream of lies for decades. People need to hear the truth. How else will they hear it, except from us? If we can save people from lies, it is our responsibility to do so.


3) It enables us to hone our own ideas and arguments. Ideas, like men, are honed and strengthened through challenge. What better way to challenge us than to face against an immovable opponent. Weak men are never challenged, are coddled and comfortable, shirk all hardship and struggle, and the ideas they hold are weak, for the same reasons. Even if no one else is listening to a bad debate, holding one in good faith, purely for our own exercise, is meritous. Often times, that is the best time to exercise, challenge, and hone our ideas and arguments. It betters us to present ourselves, and the truth, to the public when the need arises.


With all of that said, I agree that there is no convincing some people. There is no need to convince our enemies of the truth, as they will never be our allies, our neighbors, or our people. Good debate requires that if we are proven wrong, in part or whole, to acquiesce and compromise, to move closer to truth. If we abide in truth, there can be no acquiescence or compromise with evil and lies, with people that embody and speak it, who seek our destruction. Such people still need to be publicly rebuked, but only as an initial measure. The final course of action is to destroy them totally. The last part is shirked by the cowards of our day, and criticized by the weak and comfortable, but we all know what needs to be done.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 2 children
There is no “coming to truth” with foreign invaders. You kill them. That is all.

Faggot.
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Shut the fuck up you worthless nigger. Apex has proven himself again and again to be a worthy & intelligent White man. He is also my friend.

You clearly didn't read what he said past the first two lines. Like a dumb nigger. like a reddit faggot.

FAGGOT.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>REEEEEEEEEEeeeEee

12 year old detected.
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
A loyal White man is what you should detect. Nothing more or less.

You have no place telling intelligent & reasonable White men like Apex what is what. Someone like him is destined to be a leader of our folk.

The best purpose you could serve is that of a torpedo. So how about you get started on practicing what you preach.

FAGGOT.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Anytime you open your mouth to do anything other than derision, you’re losing.
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Read what I wrote. I said just that toward the end. I simply added that we must also rebuke falsehoods and lies first. It's not one or the other. It's both. I also added the merits and need for debate, in strengthening men and our ideas, as a requisite condition to this conversation.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
No. You’re getting called a slur.
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
If you intentionally forsake debate just to spite your enemies, you will hold weak and unchallenged ideas, and thus become weak yourself. You will become a brute only uttering grunts and slurs, easily manipulated and taken advantage of by those who know the truth better than you, because you abandoned one of the best ways to discover and explore it. You are literally hamstringing yourself to "spite" your enemies.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Why would I argue with someone with the IQ of a fucking gorilla?
Toast message