You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
47
Death_By_Usury on scored.co
1 year ago47 points(+0/-0/+47Score on mirror)6 children
He's right. We need to stop debating with these faggots about what an American is. Who is some street shitter to try to "enlighten" me about what it means to be American?
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)2 children
I made this point to a "moderate" years ago. "But muh Statue of Liberty poem" yea I don't care what some jew wrote about open borders a century ago. It doesn't replace the eternal principles of boundaries and statehood.
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)3 children
Its dumb all around. I wouldnt enter a debate with an indian about whats it like to be an indian... because i can not know that. Same for japanese, african etc
No reason debating people who dont actual want debate either. Someone who wants my race enslaved and deprived of its resources is an enemy, and should be treated as such, not debated as an equal.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
I must disagree, to a certain extent.
The purpose of debate is to come closer to truth. To have good debate, requires all parties to be logical, civil, honest, and prioritize truth above all else. Our enemies, and their brainwashed NPCs, are incapable of good debate, so what's the point? Bad debate can serve several constructive purposes.
1) It enables good men to rebuke falsehoods and lies directly and openly. This is one of our foundational responsibilities, to be good men, and to construct and maintain a healthy group, family, community, society, and civilization. As men, truth must be our highest philosophical priority. We can't allow falsehoods and lies to remain unchallenged in the public square, or in our midst. They must be challenged and destroyed.
2) It enables good men to speak truth to lies in front of an audience, which may contain members who haven't heard the truth. Do not forget that most of the institutions of this world are captured, and have done nothing but put forth an endless stream of lies for decades. People need to hear the truth. How else will they hear it, except from us? If we can save people from lies, it is our responsibility to do so.
3) It enables us to hone our own ideas and arguments. Ideas, like men, are honed and strengthened through challenge. What better way to challenge us than to face against an immovable opponent. Weak men are never challenged, are coddled and comfortable, shirk all hardship and struggle, and the ideas they hold are weak, for the same reasons. Even if no one else is listening to a bad debate, holding one in good faith, purely for our own exercise, is meritous. Often times, that is the best time to exercise, challenge, and hone our ideas and arguments. It betters us to present ourselves, and the truth, to the public when the need arises.
With all of that said, I agree that there is no convincing some people. There is no need to convince our enemies of the truth, as they will never be our allies, our neighbors, or our people. Good debate requires that if we are proven wrong, in part or whole, to acquiesce and compromise, to move closer to truth. If we abide in truth, there can be no acquiescence or compromise with evil and lies, with people that embody and speak it, who seek our destruction. Such people still need to be publicly rebuked, but only as an initial measure. The final course of action is to destroy them totally. The last part is shirked by the cowards of our day, and criticized by the weak and comfortable, but we all know what needs to be done.
Read what I wrote. I said just that toward the end. I simply added that we must also rebuke falsehoods and lies first. It's not one or the other. It's both. I also added the merits and need for debate, in strengthening men and our ideas, as a requisite condition to this conversation.
If you intentionally forsake debate just to spite your enemies, you will hold weak and unchallenged ideas, and thus become weak yourself. You will become a brute only uttering grunts and slurs, easily manipulated and taken advantage of by those who know the truth better than you, because you abandoned one of the best ways to discover and explore it. You are literally hamstringing yourself to "spite" your enemies.
Naturally I was, uh, "disinvited" from the group.
The purpose of debate is to come closer to truth. To have good debate, requires all parties to be logical, civil, honest, and prioritize truth above all else. Our enemies, and their brainwashed NPCs, are incapable of good debate, so what's the point? Bad debate can serve several constructive purposes.
1) It enables good men to rebuke falsehoods and lies directly and openly. This is one of our foundational responsibilities, to be good men, and to construct and maintain a healthy group, family, community, society, and civilization. As men, truth must be our highest philosophical priority. We can't allow falsehoods and lies to remain unchallenged in the public square, or in our midst. They must be challenged and destroyed.
2) It enables good men to speak truth to lies in front of an audience, which may contain members who haven't heard the truth. Do not forget that most of the institutions of this world are captured, and have done nothing but put forth an endless stream of lies for decades. People need to hear the truth. How else will they hear it, except from us? If we can save people from lies, it is our responsibility to do so.
3) It enables us to hone our own ideas and arguments. Ideas, like men, are honed and strengthened through challenge. What better way to challenge us than to face against an immovable opponent. Weak men are never challenged, are coddled and comfortable, shirk all hardship and struggle, and the ideas they hold are weak, for the same reasons. Even if no one else is listening to a bad debate, holding one in good faith, purely for our own exercise, is meritous. Often times, that is the best time to exercise, challenge, and hone our ideas and arguments. It betters us to present ourselves, and the truth, to the public when the need arises.
With all of that said, I agree that there is no convincing some people. There is no need to convince our enemies of the truth, as they will never be our allies, our neighbors, or our people. Good debate requires that if we are proven wrong, in part or whole, to acquiesce and compromise, to move closer to truth. If we abide in truth, there can be no acquiescence or compromise with evil and lies, with people that embody and speak it, who seek our destruction. Such people still need to be publicly rebuked, but only as an initial measure. The final course of action is to destroy them totally. The last part is shirked by the cowards of our day, and criticized by the weak and comfortable, but we all know what needs to be done.
Faggot.
You clearly didn't read what he said past the first two lines. Like a dumb nigger. like a reddit faggot.
FAGGOT.
12 year old detected.
You have no place telling intelligent & reasonable White men like Apex what is what. Someone like him is destined to be a leader of our folk.
The best purpose you could serve is that of a torpedo. So how about you get started on practicing what you preach.
FAGGOT.