1 year ago47 points(+0/-0/+47Score on mirror)6 children
He's right. We need to stop debating with these faggots about what an American is. Who is some street shitter to try to "enlighten" me about what it means to be American?
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)2 children
I made this point to a "moderate" years ago. "But muh Statue of Liberty poem" yea I don't care what some jew wrote about open borders a century ago. It doesn't replace the eternal principles of boundaries and statehood.
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)3 children
Its dumb all around. I wouldnt enter a debate with an indian about whats it like to be an indian... because i can not know that. Same for japanese, african etc
No reason debating people who dont actual want debate either. Someone who wants my race enslaved and deprived of its resources is an enemy, and should be treated as such, not debated as an equal.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
I must disagree, to a certain extent.
The purpose of debate is to come closer to truth. To have good debate, requires all parties to be logical, civil, honest, and prioritize truth above all else. Our enemies, and their brainwashed NPCs, are incapable of good debate, so what's the point? Bad debate can serve several constructive purposes.
1) It enables good men to rebuke falsehoods and lies directly and openly. This is one of our foundational responsibilities, to be good men, and to construct and maintain a healthy group, family, community, society, and civilization. As men, truth must be our highest philosophical priority. We can't allow falsehoods and lies to remain unchallenged in the public square, or in our midst. They must be challenged and destroyed.
2) It enables good men to speak truth to lies in front of an audience, which may contain members who haven't heard the truth. Do not forget that most of the institutions of this world are captured, and have done nothing but put forth an endless stream of lies for decades. People need to hear the truth. How else will they hear it, except from us? If we can save people from lies, it is our responsibility to do so.
3) It enables us to hone our own ideas and arguments. Ideas, like men, are honed and strengthened through challenge. What better way to challenge us than to face against an immovable opponent. Weak men are never challenged, are coddled and comfortable, shirk all hardship and struggle, and the ideas they hold are weak, for the same reasons. Even if no one else is listening to a bad debate, holding one in good faith, purely for our own exercise, is meritous. Often times, that is the best time to exercise, challenge, and hone our ideas and arguments. It betters us to present ourselves, and the truth, to the public when the need arises.
With all of that said, I agree that there is no convincing some people. There is no need to convince our enemies of the truth, as they will never be our allies, our neighbors, or our people. Good debate requires that if we are proven wrong, in part or whole, to acquiesce and compromise, to move closer to truth. If we abide in truth, there can be no acquiescence or compromise with evil and lies, with people that embody and speak it, who seek our destruction. Such people still need to be publicly rebuked, but only as an initial measure. The final course of action is to destroy them totally. The last part is shirked by the cowards of our day, and criticized by the weak and comfortable, but we all know what needs to be done.
Read what I wrote. I said just that toward the end. I simply added that we must also rebuke falsehoods and lies first. It's not one or the other. It's both. I also added the merits and need for debate, in strengthening men and our ideas, as a requisite condition to this conversation.
If you intentionally forsake debate just to spite your enemies, you will hold weak and unchallenged ideas, and thus become weak yourself. You will become a brute only uttering grunts and slurs, easily manipulated and taken advantage of by those who know the truth better than you, because you abandoned one of the best ways to discover and explore it. You are literally hamstringing yourself to "spite" your enemies.
It redpill terminology that's called "holding frame" and we don't have to engage with them on their terms. The most American thing an Indian can do would be to stay in India because they're Indian, not American.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
Hate-machine is probably an edgy teenager. The Leon Trotski thing is part of Sam's humor and hitting a cultural theme most overlook. Post WW2 Red-Americana.
Here is a sketch from Sam Hyde's show Million Dollar Extreme called "jews rock" where people dance around a stage for a minute while the phrase "jews rock" plays repeatedly.
I admit I have not seen the show (I was far too old when it released) but this doesn't seem very based to me. Explain.
Explain my ass. His show was canceled for that. I'm not responsible for you being an idiot who doesn't understand parody, context or tongue in cheek comedy.
You had a bad read on someone you don't know much about. Happens to all of us.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)3 children
You need to get your jewdar fixed. I'm open to hearing what made you believe he checked out as not being ethnically jewish but there is no part of him that is not jewish, the comedy, the voice, every part of his head. I like the words that come out of his mouth most of the time but not so much that I will not believe my senses or trust him.
Chinese are usually short but Yao Ming is like 7ft tall, so what? There are outliers. Jonah Hill, Adam Sandler, Jason Segal and Ben Stiller are all allegedly over 6ft tall. Also jews are notorious race mixers... And liars, many non-jewish men also lie about their height or wear shoes to make them appear taller. That's not a great basis especially if that's you're only reason you think he's not a jew.
Your first example, Yao Ming, was a Chinese experiment. The CCP made the tallest Chinese woman and the tallest Chinese man procreate. All the other examples you provided are not very tall men, which is my point. Jews are unlikely to be very tall because they're shorter than Whites. It's a perfectly good basis.
You need to get your jewdar fixed. You are looking at obvious intentional shit- the trotsky glasses, the goofy hair & beard.
My jewdar has been tested and actuated far more than most here. I can practically smell a kike when I encounter a new bogey in person, and when looking at a picture I just need to hear the voice. Like anything else my jewdar isn't perfect, but it's well tested and over 90% on previously unidentified foreskin eaters. My conclusion is "not a jew" unless compelling evidence is provided to the contrary,
You are paying attention to all the wrong things if you see a jew when you look at Sam Hyde. I'm not particularly fond of most of his comedy stuff (didn't even know who he was before a few years ago) but between what he says and the way he has intentionally presented himself appearance-wise, he's using the very systems of media & the way they are disseminated to present a message that is far more beneficial to us than it is to the enemy.
Under the conditions we are in (and the sea of shit around him) he is easily a net-positive for our purposes.
Sam talks about why they got kicked off from Adult Swim and he states that it was from the "jews rock" skit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_lama_Zwmo. They go after Jews but not so much anymore and they know that if they did then there goes their revenue stream.
PLEASE TO BE SHITTING ON MY FINGERS SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
Naturally I was, uh, "disinvited" from the group.
The purpose of debate is to come closer to truth. To have good debate, requires all parties to be logical, civil, honest, and prioritize truth above all else. Our enemies, and their brainwashed NPCs, are incapable of good debate, so what's the point? Bad debate can serve several constructive purposes.
1) It enables good men to rebuke falsehoods and lies directly and openly. This is one of our foundational responsibilities, to be good men, and to construct and maintain a healthy group, family, community, society, and civilization. As men, truth must be our highest philosophical priority. We can't allow falsehoods and lies to remain unchallenged in the public square, or in our midst. They must be challenged and destroyed.
2) It enables good men to speak truth to lies in front of an audience, which may contain members who haven't heard the truth. Do not forget that most of the institutions of this world are captured, and have done nothing but put forth an endless stream of lies for decades. People need to hear the truth. How else will they hear it, except from us? If we can save people from lies, it is our responsibility to do so.
3) It enables us to hone our own ideas and arguments. Ideas, like men, are honed and strengthened through challenge. What better way to challenge us than to face against an immovable opponent. Weak men are never challenged, are coddled and comfortable, shirk all hardship and struggle, and the ideas they hold are weak, for the same reasons. Even if no one else is listening to a bad debate, holding one in good faith, purely for our own exercise, is meritous. Often times, that is the best time to exercise, challenge, and hone our ideas and arguments. It betters us to present ourselves, and the truth, to the public when the need arises.
With all of that said, I agree that there is no convincing some people. There is no need to convince our enemies of the truth, as they will never be our allies, our neighbors, or our people. Good debate requires that if we are proven wrong, in part or whole, to acquiesce and compromise, to move closer to truth. If we abide in truth, there can be no acquiescence or compromise with evil and lies, with people that embody and speak it, who seek our destruction. Such people still need to be publicly rebuked, but only as an initial measure. The final course of action is to destroy them totally. The last part is shirked by the cowards of our day, and criticized by the weak and comfortable, but we all know what needs to be done.
Faggot.
You clearly didn't read what he said past the first two lines. Like a dumb nigger. like a reddit faggot.
FAGGOT.
12 year old detected.
You have no place telling intelligent & reasonable White men like Apex what is what. Someone like him is destined to be a leader of our folk.
The best purpose you could serve is that of a torpedo. So how about you get started on practicing what you preach.
FAGGOT.