New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Meritocracy might appeal to you, but it's built on deception. Maybe it could lead to less browns in high-paying roles, but did You ever wonder WHO would determine the criteria of merit?

Where do you think you would stand in a meritocracy?

Did you go into the trades over academia? Are you self-taught? Do you lack a piece of paper from an accredited institution? Do you encourage others to avoid college? Is it your goal to withdraw from society and live on a farm?

If you answered yes to any of those, then you aren't qualified in the eyes of your new "meritocratic" overlords. The unpleasant truth is that OUR guys were never even going to have the chance to show up for that conversation. It will be those already in power, already "qualified", with widespread influence who have a say. People like Elon Musk, [who has been promoting this agenda](https://xcancel.com/MarioNawfal/status/1877115050973913294) and [would rather import workers than train domestic ones](https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1871993827264983372). [Republicans and democrats both agree that foreign nationals seeking American education deserve a green card as part of their degree](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1804138166242181120/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/2CHUmyKsoEeer2I7.mp4)! They are elected officials, tech oligarchs and billionaires– who are you to tell them they're not qualified to make up the rules?

Support for meritocracy is calling for us to import the "bestest and brightest" minds and their families into Our Nations. It is an addendum to the classic "diversity is our strength." The unfortunate reality is that we already live in a "meritocratic society" and people still cry that "true meritocracy has never been tried!" Does "the science" ring a bell? Do you really want more "experts" to listen to? Much like communism, no amount of polishing is ever going to make it "good enough".

The solution isn't to withdraw from society, but rather to pioneer into a new Parallel Society by collaborating with networks of qualified White men. Farming and carpentry skills are useful, but We will also need our own coders, doctors, lawyers and artists. The foundations already exist thanks to men like Andrew Torba and those at c/ParallelSociety.

Our enemies will call us the "woke right", argue that we want "DEI for Whites", and interrogate us for denying them their precious meritocracy. Know that it was always a farce and that meritocracy without cohesion is doomed to fail.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
DT777 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Another, (probably better) solution could be to insert ourselves into these corrupted institutions as best we can, similar to the long march through the institutions that commies definitely pulled off, infiltrating government and educational positions: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_march_through_the_institutions

We need people to be leaders in corrupted fields like education, government, and big tech so that they can change those institutions and hire more likeminded people.

Also, Torba may say a lot of the right things, but he is someone to be wary of. His mother consults with psychics and his brother is a faggot. That doesn’t necessarily make what he is saying wrong, but it’s important information. See this post for a detailed breakdown of all the problems with Gab: https://providencepost.com/torba-grift-of-gab/
newuser8 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
We all can do this. In fact I'm doing it right now. First, I leak all my companies DEI by screenshooting and sharing. Secondly, I only hire Whites and not the Poos. Thirdly, I only hire Whites to work on my house. Anytime I sell anything online, I screen their first name.
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The Parallel Society is necessary because infiltration isn't worthwhile.

If there was a "based" teacher in a public school, how long do you think they would last before they're fired? If they do get into a meaningful position, how much have they compromised themselves to get there? Would we even still be able to recognize them as Our Own?

Think to Mark Zuckerberg's libertarian "transformation". A man who upheld the status quo for his life suddenly decides to turn around and be "based". Jewish heritage aside, no one should be putting their trust in Zuckerberg or anyone like him.
DT777 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I understand what you mean. It would be hard to balance compromising your values and integrity in the short term to hopefully uphold them and make a larger impact in the long term.
Toast message