Meritocracy might appeal to you, but it's built on deception. Maybe it could lead to less browns in high-paying roles, but did You ever wonder WHO would determine the criteria of merit?
Where do you think you would stand in a meritocracy?
Did you go into the trades over academia? Are you self-taught? Do you lack a piece of paper from an accredited institution? Do you encourage others to avoid college? Is it your goal to withdraw from society and live on a farm?
If you answered yes to any of those, then you aren't qualified in the eyes of your new "meritocratic" overlords. The unpleasant truth is that OUR guys were never even going to have the chance to show up for that conversation. It will be those already in power, already "qualified", with widespread influence who have a say. People like Elon Musk, [who has been promoting this agenda](https://xcancel.com/MarioNawfal/status/1877115050973913294) and [would rather import workers than train domestic ones](https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1871993827264983372). [Republicans and democrats both agree that foreign nationals seeking American education deserve a green card as part of their degree](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1804138166242181120/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/2CHUmyKsoEeer2I7.mp4)! They are elected officials, tech oligarchs and billionaires– who are you to tell them they're not qualified to make up the rules?
Support for meritocracy is calling for us to import the "bestest and brightest" minds and their families into Our Nations. It is an addendum to the classic "diversity is our strength." The unfortunate reality is that we already live in a "meritocratic society" and people still cry that "true meritocracy has never been tried!" Does "the science" ring a bell? Do you really want more "experts" to listen to? Much like communism, no amount of polishing is ever going to make it "good enough".
The solution isn't to withdraw from society, but rather to pioneer into a new Parallel Society by collaborating with networks of qualified White men. Farming and carpentry skills are useful, but We will also need our own coders, doctors, lawyers and artists. The foundations already exist thanks to men like Andrew Torba and those at c/ParallelSociety.
Our enemies will call us the "woke right", argue that we want "DEI for Whites", and interrogate us for denying them their precious meritocracy. Know that it was always a farce and that meritocracy without cohesion is doomed to fail.
What you are describing is a pure meritocracy. How does one man gain absolute power over all others? Because he is superior to all of them and they know it. If that weren't the case, he would face constant rebellion by stronger men.
>We must take examples from God. To imitate our maker and in his honor to build a system of power where we isolate our political power within our racial and ethnic boundaries. To each their own, as long as we all unite in this eternal struggle, we will be victorious against those filthy Heathens and Sodomite worshipers.
Do you not think that there are heathens and sodomite worshippers within our racial boundaries already? Who let in the foreigners and Jews? They didn't invade, they were invited, and allowing weakness and failure just because the person in question is White weakens us all.
As I mentioned in another comment, I don't think Whites are superior just because I'm White, I think we're superior because I have eyes. And the reason for this is that we have always valued merit where other peoples values conformity ("equity" in the modern parlance).
We value, or at least tolerate, ingenuity where other races punish disrupting the status quo; this is why we invent everything. The only reason asiatic cultures invent anything (and it's always just an improvement on a White invention) is because we have created a **global** culture of innovation that apes our success. They actively punish merit in favour of a bureaucracy; they chose their leaders based on a false god created by adherence to rules and precedents and it only can be seen to work when it attempts to copy it's betters.
>We must take examples from God.
And what do you think God values? Does he raise the wicked? Job prospers because he is Good, not due to trickery or flattery. Even when he loses all worldy possessions, he still prospers by being Good and submitting to God. Apart from biblical reference, how do you think God creates the variety of life on this world? By arbitrarily creating creatures and adjusting His world to their needs, or by creating a world that tests them and lets the worthy be fruitful?
Merit is nearly synonymous with Good, except that merit refers to specific domains while Good is universal.