Meritocracy might appeal to you, but it's built on deception. Maybe it could lead to less browns in high-paying roles, but did You ever wonder WHO would determine the criteria of merit?
Where do you think you would stand in a meritocracy?
Did you go into the trades over academia? Are you self-taught? Do you lack a piece of paper from an accredited institution? Do you encourage others to avoid college? Is it your goal to withdraw from society and live on a farm?
If you answered yes to any of those, then you aren't qualified in the eyes of your new "meritocratic" overlords. The unpleasant truth is that OUR guys were never even going to have the chance to show up for that conversation. It will be those already in power, already "qualified", with widespread influence who have a say. People like Elon Musk, [who has been promoting this agenda](https://xcancel.com/MarioNawfal/status/1877115050973913294) and [would rather import workers than train domestic ones](https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1871993827264983372). [Republicans and democrats both agree that foreign nationals seeking American education deserve a green card as part of their degree](https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1804138166242181120/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/2CHUmyKsoEeer2I7.mp4)! They are elected officials, tech oligarchs and billionaires– who are you to tell them they're not qualified to make up the rules?
Support for meritocracy is calling for us to import the "bestest and brightest" minds and their families into Our Nations. It is an addendum to the classic "diversity is our strength." The unfortunate reality is that we already live in a "meritocratic society" and people still cry that "true meritocracy has never been tried!" Does "the science" ring a bell? Do you really want more "experts" to listen to? Much like communism, no amount of polishing is ever going to make it "good enough".
The solution isn't to withdraw from society, but rather to pioneer into a new Parallel Society by collaborating with networks of qualified White men. Farming and carpentry skills are useful, but We will also need our own coders, doctors, lawyers and artists. The foundations already exist thanks to men like Andrew Torba and those at c/ParallelSociety.
Our enemies will call us the "woke right", argue that we want "DEI for Whites", and interrogate us for denying them their precious meritocracy. Know that it was always a farce and that meritocracy without cohesion is doomed to fail.
Is academia a meritocracy? No, because someone needs to tell you if you're doing well. How about capitalism? No, because it's based on usury and who you know is more important than what you do. Democracy? Again, people decide who wins, not reality.
Obviously, "true meritocracy has never been tried" because total purity is impossible in an impure world. The same can be said for any other system. But we can still see the superior results of systems that value merit over those that don't.
The closest to true meritocracy we've had would be absolute monarchy. A "true" monarchy would have kings descending patrilineally, but in reality weak kings are deposed by stronger men who become king **because they are better by definition**.
And you know who wins, in the systems that value merit? Whites. That's why I say "I'm not a White supremicist because the term is redundant". I don't think Whites are superiors because I'm White, I think they're superior because I have eyes. And I'm sure not going to view some retarded junkie wanker as a member of the master race just because of his ancestry.
If you want to be treated as White, you need to act White, and that means merit.