New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Something that has always bothered me is that no one ever explains why communism is so bad. They always talk about tangential and unimportant things like "their economic system sucks" or "they don't respect rights". They never cut to the heart of the matter.

At the core of communism are two ideas that are deadly dangerous. People found holding these ideas must be treated as an existential threat and we must behave accordingly around them.

It's like if you live in a straw house and there's a guy shouting "I'm gonna burn your house down!" and buying matches and starting fires all the time. It's that sort of thing.

The two ideas are, in rough form:

(1) That reality is wrong and we must change reality.

(2) That the reason why we fail is because of "THEM" and we must exterminate "THEM" or we cannot succeed.

None of these ideas are unique to communism, nor are they novel in the modern age. They've been around for a long time, and people know how to deal with people who hold these ideas. You can say that traditional society is built up as a fortress to protect us from people who have these ideas.

The issue with communism is that the way the go about accomplishing their purposes and the face that they put on while doing it makes them exceptionally tricky. It's why they fear being "outed" as communist, and why they try so desperately to pretend to be a sheep.

The concept of "THEM" for a communist doesn't run along the lines of traditional group inclusion. They are not isolating people because they are the wrong race or tribe or social class or religion or whatever else. They are not even isolating people because they are rich or poor, educated or ignorant, noble or common, etc...

The "THEM" is literally anyone who has traditional ideas. They want to exterminate you not be cause you are white or christian or rich or smart or anything like that. If it were simply that, it would be a really, really easy problem to solve. But because they are trying to hunt and find anyone who has traditional ideas and are going to hold on to those ideas, it makes it really hard to use tradition to create a bulwark against them.

Let me give you an example of what I mean to make it clear.

A: "Let's have sex outside of marriage!" B: "Oh no that is not what our ancestors did. It could have terrible consequences!" A: "Screw the ancestors! Screw tradition!" Nine months later... A: "Maybe our ancestors were right. Let's get married and raise this kid."

By purposefully disobeying tradition and customs and social norms, people put themselves on the other side of the line. When they realize life sucks on the wrong side of the line, all they have to do is cross back and traditions, culture, and society is restored.

Now let's look at how communists do things.

"My life sucks. I have broken all the traditions and societal norms and now I am miserable. It can't possibly be because I am wrong and everyone else is right. I must kill everyone who disagrees with me otherwise I cannot be happy. But since there are so many of them and so few of me, I must be subversive and quietly destroy all of society unless they figure out what I am doing and stop me."

Do you see the issue? "It can't possibly be because I broke all the traditions, it must be because THEY are the problem, so I must subvert them to find happiness!"

Identify the problem, and the solution becomes almost obvious...
You must log in or sign up to comment
9 comments:
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Its because communism is spiritual judaism (aka Satanism) and therefore not bound by any actual morality, but simply "might makes right, and we do anything to "win"", but their victory goal is literal insanity and self-destruction.
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Close but not quite right.

They aren't even bound by "might makes right". If it were that simple, we'd have dealt with them a long time ago.

They have no victory goal. Their goal, if there is any, is to make people miserable. Same as Satan's.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
"Might makes right" is inherently a meritocracy. It's not the perfect system, and it sucks if you're weak, but it puts the strongest people over the weakest which ensures, at the least, the survival of the group.

Aligning your interests with the successful, and supporting them, is the best way to ensure at least some success. I don't help homeless people, I help rich people because they will make good use of my contribution while homeless people will squander it, just like the rest of their lives. I don't even expect anything in return; it's enough to know that they will make the world a better place just because of how they act.

(Don't confuse the successful with those who parasitise the success of others, ie Jews, capitalists, communists, etc. Those people fool semi-successful people into thinking they themselves are successful in order to get support, which makes them look successful, which lets them solicit more support, ad nauseum)
Ihatetheanti-Christ on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
TIL, killing the bad guys is communism
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
You didn't understand the point.

The "THEM" of the communists is not whites or christians or whatever. It's anyone who has any traditional ideas at all.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Or maybe even further: "any convenient scapegoat".

The Bolsheviks didn't genocide the Kulaks because they were particularily traditional; in fact they were quite progressive in transcending the feudal serf system. The Bolsheviks genocided them because they made a good scapegoat, even though they were actually feeding the supporters of Bolshevism.

Communists will literally rip themselves apart to avoid responsibility for their own actions.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Let's just hit dead center on this one:
"Anyone who threatens to undermine their faith in their false beliefs."

It's not about the beliefs of the victim or trying to avoid "responsibility".

It's about making commies feel that there is *no dissent to their worldview*, either ideological or practical. Because that's the only way their beliefs can survive.

It's expressed in varying degrees according to the insecurity of the system's controllers' egos. A self-assured society has nothing to fear from people quitting their game, living in the woods, and mocking the city-dwellers. The American system is also guilty of this, that's why they couldn't tolerate the hippies or the Occupy movement.

Fact- and merit-based societies need only fear communism, which seeks to elevate low-merit ideas and people into positions far above their worth, which is unsurprisingly unstable and can only be maintained through lies enforced by violence.
Fabius on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Communism is bad because it's based on greed and theft.
KingSweyn on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
You're really effin close to the heart of the matter, but it's lacking a certain depth, like the desperation that their ideology *has to be true*, and the heavy-handed enforcement of unnatural social status/prestige/honor/rank.

Understanding status motive is crucial to understanding herd animals, which is most humans (and not all).
Toast message