The result are exactly what you'd expect.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
15
1 year ago
15 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+15Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
And for context, on the White side. Workers from North America, France and UK more commonly gets an education back home, which means once they arrive in Denmark or the Netherlands they will start working immediately and pay taxes. Higher education but lack of knowledge about the tax system often also leads to them paying more income tax than they need to.
This in contrast to Germany were many Germans go to Denmark to get free education, which is a net negative for Denmark. Many Germans also own summer houses allover Scandinavia, again this generally cost more than it brings in due to low utility cost and low property taxes. Don't be fooled by the numbers tho, their contribution is similar to the native population of these countries, as education is one big expense in countries were it's tax funded which is most of Europe.
This in contrast to Germany were many Germans go to Denmark to get free education, which is a net negative for Denmark. Many Germans also own summer houses allover Scandinavia, again this generally cost more than it brings in due to low utility cost and low property taxes. Don't be fooled by the numbers tho, their contribution is similar to the native population of these countries, as education is one big expense in countries were it's tax funded which is most of Europe.
That's not entirely fair. As for the positive ones, if they are measured based on GDP and taxes, it is biased. For example the Americans have a lot of useless busybody jobs that pay extremely well for practically keeping a seat warm and be part of the jewish facade for "shareholders." How many work at Google? They do NOTHING. Even the productive just keep themselves busy with work, but it ends up in a void.
Big corporations reside mostly in the US, which are sitting on their products and services and do NOTHING new for ages. They hire pajeets as CEOs because they want uncritical, obedient, DEI slaves who won't rock the boat and give them virtue points. The US is the kike pet #1.
Germany for example is fucked beyond recognition as taxes are high, housing prices are extreme, corruption is high, and the economy is slowly collapsing. Bad politics has a lot of influence in making it worse. Welfare is relatively high in Germany too.
Hungary is also fucked, because they are caught in a spiral of increasing taxes to increase welfare, which ruins the economy, which necessitates more taxes to increase welfare, which further ruins the economy. The way to win is to not pay taxes, or pay less of it. And there is no alternative because most others want the feminism-nigger-trash.
However what matters most is the relation of Whites vs niggers and sandniggers here.
Big corporations reside mostly in the US, which are sitting on their products and services and do NOTHING new for ages. They hire pajeets as CEOs because they want uncritical, obedient, DEI slaves who won't rock the boat and give them virtue points. The US is the kike pet #1.
Germany for example is fucked beyond recognition as taxes are high, housing prices are extreme, corruption is high, and the economy is slowly collapsing. Bad politics has a lot of influence in making it worse. Welfare is relatively high in Germany too.
Hungary is also fucked, because they are caught in a spiral of increasing taxes to increase welfare, which ruins the economy, which necessitates more taxes to increase welfare, which further ruins the economy. The way to win is to not pay taxes, or pay less of it. And there is no alternative because most others want the feminism-nigger-trash.
However what matters most is the relation of Whites vs niggers and sandniggers here.
Major corporations in the US have a problem. They'd make more money just collecting interest on their fortunes than hiring people to make new products and acquiring smaller companies. As such, they only play defense, trying to keep competitors from showing up and using everything they can think of to make it so.
It's been this way for a very long time.
Hiring smart people to sit on their butt and do nothing is a winning strategy for these companies. The last thing they want is for their engineers to leave and start a new Google.
It's been this way for a very long time.
Hiring smart people to sit on their butt and do nothing is a winning strategy for these companies. The last thing they want is for their engineers to leave and start a new Google.
Exactly.
And to do this is only possible in some Western countries, and given the high amount of big, international corporations, it goes especially for the US.
While these European "shitholes" have to do actual real work and cannot rely on infinite jewish money printing to succeed.
And to do this is only possible in some Western countries, and given the high amount of big, international corporations, it goes especially for the US.
While these European "shitholes" have to do actual real work and cannot rely on infinite jewish money printing to succeed.
No, I think you misunderstood me.
The US corporations have made such a ridiculous amount of money that guarding their wealth and drawing interest on it makes more money than doing business ever would.
The US corporations have made such a ridiculous amount of money that guarding their wealth and drawing interest on it makes more money than doing business ever would.
But how doesn't that support my point?
Take for instance Apple, one of the largest corporations to ever exist on planet earth according to its market cap. It's worth what $2 trillion now? I don't know.
Apple is sitting on a portfolio of assets. One of the assets they have is their iPhone business, which costs $X to run and brings in $Y.
Since Apple has already made a bunch of money, it is sitting on umpteen trillion dollars. With leverage, they can multiply that to probably hundreds of trillions of dollars.
Apple ran out of things to invest that money in a long time ago. The iPhone business, as profitable as it is, is only a line item on its investment portfolio. So Apple takes its earnings and uses it to buy back shares of its stock, in addition to paying out dividends.
Now, ask yourself this question: What is the biggest threat to Apple, Apple's shareholders specifically? What would cause shares of Apple to fall in value, or the dividends to stop flowing?
If there was a business they could invest their profits and assets in, that would be wonderful news for the shareholders. The stock price would shoot up. Although dividends might be lean for a few years, rest assured that they will be healthy once investment in the business stops. But there are no new businesses Apple can conceive of. There is no one out there with any good ideas on how to make even more money.
Apple's biggest risk isn't that people stop buying iPhones. Sure, the stock price trembles every time news comes out that Apple is losing market share in China or whatever. But people aren't investing in Apple because they have a fantastic iPhone line. No, they invest in Apple because they hold tremendous assets all across the board in every industry and have been pretty good with investing their assets over time.
If Apple hires a bunch of investors to invest their money, and they make some really, really bad gambles, and they end up losing all their investments (a good example would be "they went short on GME before this nonsense started with GME" -- billions and billions in losses) and THAT would devastate Apple.
That's my point. If there were a successful business in Europe, Apple would buy it, or invest heavily in it, or partner with it, or whatever. But there is not. You Europeans work your butts off on projects that aren't worth working on and that will never make money. Blame it on your government or whatever, regardless, you will never create a trillion dollar business in Europe because it is Europe.
You think "Oh I am working hard so I should get paid well!" What nonsense! No one in America except losers think that way. No, we search and search for something we can do well that is worth doing, and we do that. We don't expect to get paid for our work because it is work. We hold ourselves accountable to find something worth doing. If we are working in an industry that is failing, we change careers. For instance, I used to write software, and was very good at it, and made a lot of money doing it, but now I am raising animals. I intend to be very good at that and deliver a top-quality product at a fraction of the price the grocery stores charge. I intend to do all that while working less than 20 hours a week. I do not expect to get paid for my work, in fact. I expect to get paid because I created something worth creating.
Now, Apple is an investment company. They want the economy to be stable and predictable. They don't want guys like me to reinvent the internet and turn everything upside down again. That's why Apple hires guys like me and keeps them busy on pointless projects and pays them just enough that they don't quit and find another job, but not so much that they quit and start a farm.
See the problem? Apple will never innovate ever again. Amazon, Microsoft, all of these big "tech" companies do not innovate, and never will. They are in fact in the business of stopping innovation, because innovation hurts their investment portfolio. In the rare case where something escapes and is a risk to their investments, they buy it and quash it like a bug. I've seen this countless times.
I used to work for Amazon BEFORE they were profitable, and before they owned almost every server on the internet. The mood was different. Bezos wanted new ideas and new businesses and innovation. Once it became clear that Amazon had solved the server hosting issue and was going to become the only place you could get servers cheaply, they stopped innovating. They stopped exploring. They stopped building. They pretty much fired or let all the smart people go, and hired pajeets to put out fires from time to time. Do you see the issue? Do you understand why typically startup CEOs are asked to leave to make room for investment company CEOs once their assets grow large enough?
Apple is sitting on a portfolio of assets. One of the assets they have is their iPhone business, which costs $X to run and brings in $Y.
Since Apple has already made a bunch of money, it is sitting on umpteen trillion dollars. With leverage, they can multiply that to probably hundreds of trillions of dollars.
Apple ran out of things to invest that money in a long time ago. The iPhone business, as profitable as it is, is only a line item on its investment portfolio. So Apple takes its earnings and uses it to buy back shares of its stock, in addition to paying out dividends.
Now, ask yourself this question: What is the biggest threat to Apple, Apple's shareholders specifically? What would cause shares of Apple to fall in value, or the dividends to stop flowing?
If there was a business they could invest their profits and assets in, that would be wonderful news for the shareholders. The stock price would shoot up. Although dividends might be lean for a few years, rest assured that they will be healthy once investment in the business stops. But there are no new businesses Apple can conceive of. There is no one out there with any good ideas on how to make even more money.
Apple's biggest risk isn't that people stop buying iPhones. Sure, the stock price trembles every time news comes out that Apple is losing market share in China or whatever. But people aren't investing in Apple because they have a fantastic iPhone line. No, they invest in Apple because they hold tremendous assets all across the board in every industry and have been pretty good with investing their assets over time.
If Apple hires a bunch of investors to invest their money, and they make some really, really bad gambles, and they end up losing all their investments (a good example would be "they went short on GME before this nonsense started with GME" -- billions and billions in losses) and THAT would devastate Apple.
That's my point. If there were a successful business in Europe, Apple would buy it, or invest heavily in it, or partner with it, or whatever. But there is not. You Europeans work your butts off on projects that aren't worth working on and that will never make money. Blame it on your government or whatever, regardless, you will never create a trillion dollar business in Europe because it is Europe.
You think "Oh I am working hard so I should get paid well!" What nonsense! No one in America except losers think that way. No, we search and search for something we can do well that is worth doing, and we do that. We don't expect to get paid for our work because it is work. We hold ourselves accountable to find something worth doing. If we are working in an industry that is failing, we change careers. For instance, I used to write software, and was very good at it, and made a lot of money doing it, but now I am raising animals. I intend to be very good at that and deliver a top-quality product at a fraction of the price the grocery stores charge. I intend to do all that while working less than 20 hours a week. I do not expect to get paid for my work, in fact. I expect to get paid because I created something worth creating.
Now, Apple is an investment company. They want the economy to be stable and predictable. They don't want guys like me to reinvent the internet and turn everything upside down again. That's why Apple hires guys like me and keeps them busy on pointless projects and pays them just enough that they don't quit and find another job, but not so much that they quit and start a farm.
See the problem? Apple will never innovate ever again. Amazon, Microsoft, all of these big "tech" companies do not innovate, and never will. They are in fact in the business of stopping innovation, because innovation hurts their investment portfolio. In the rare case where something escapes and is a risk to their investments, they buy it and quash it like a bug. I've seen this countless times.
I used to work for Amazon BEFORE they were profitable, and before they owned almost every server on the internet. The mood was different. Bezos wanted new ideas and new businesses and innovation. Once it became clear that Amazon had solved the server hosting issue and was going to become the only place you could get servers cheaply, they stopped innovating. They stopped exploring. They stopped building. They pretty much fired or let all the smart people go, and hired pajeets to put out fires from time to time. Do you see the issue? Do you understand why typically startup CEOs are asked to leave to make room for investment company CEOs once their assets grow large enough?
which country is Western?
bullshit chart with make believe nations
bullshit chart with make believe nations
"Former Yugoslavia" The chicken shits couldn't just name the lazy southern countries. There's a reason it split apart. lol
Toast message