New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
105
posted 1 year ago by Redpilled2Depression on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +105Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Personally disagree.

There are levels of homeless, with caverns between. Living rent free in a tricked out camper van beats a $2400/mo goyshack any day of the week if you ask me. Unironically safer in some areas, too.
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Also a good idea.

Tom Green Van Life - The Movie Part One https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbd3hpqKkCo
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
My definition of homeless does not include trailer park people. I mean literally being homeless and probably sleeping in an alley.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Nor does mine.

Strictly speaking, not having a home doesn't mean just not owning a shelter, it means not owning a *place* which the shelter occupies.
 No physical slice of geography to call your own. As such, someone sleeping behind a dumpster in an alleyway, in their van in a Walmart parking lot, or in a secretly built cabin out in the woods on public land, are all equally under the banner of homeless.

Meanwhile the guy living in an uprooted manufactured home on a piece of undeveloped land in the middle of nowhere, and the one living in a six bedroom McMansion in the suburbs, are equally homeowners.

  In both cases, the quality of life varies greatly, to the point where even the inferior category can supercede its inherent better.
Toast message