When in doubt, deport 100 million people
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Asshole landlords are so much less of a problem when they have to personally live with their consequences right on their doorstep.
I don't want my tenants to be my neighbors so I never have privacy and I travel for work, and am frequently out of town for 100 nights a year. I'm providing you a rental, not maintaining the property personally. You can call me and I'll send a plumber.
Your suggestion is absurd.
Keep paying me rent, faggot.
Sure, it is better than being homeless, bit still.
There are levels of homeless, with caverns between. Living rent free in a tricked out camper van beats a $2400/mo goyshack any day of the week if you ask me. Unironically safer in some areas, too.
Tom Green Van Life - The Movie Part One https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbd3hpqKkCo
Strictly speaking, not having a home doesn't mean just not owning a shelter, it means not owning a *place* which the shelter occupies.
No physical slice of geography to call your own. As such, someone sleeping behind a dumpster in an alleyway, in their van in a Walmart parking lot, or in a secretly built cabin out in the woods on public land, are all equally under the banner of homeless.
Meanwhile the guy living in an uprooted manufactured home on a piece of undeveloped land in the middle of nowhere, and the one living in a six bedroom McMansion in the suburbs, are equally homeowners.
In both cases, the quality of life varies greatly, to the point where even the inferior category can supercede its inherent better.
I can rough it if i have to but i like modern luxuries.