When in doubt, deport 100 million people
(media.scored.co)
less shitskins--less resources and space consumed by said shitskins
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
33 comments:
Boomers: “back in my day we had to mow grass and wash cars to get lunch money in high school!”
Also boomers: “WHOS GONNA WASH MY CAR AND CUT MY GRASS?”
Also boomers: “WHOS GONNA WASH MY CAR AND CUT MY GRASS?”
Every (((news story)))- “Americans just don’t want to build new housing to help future doctors and basket weavers colonize their backyards”
If even a million get deported in 4 years I'll be surprised. They'll probably pump up the numbers and count those who cross the border, immediately get apprehended and sent back, as deportations.
[It's a jewish warfare thing. You wouldn't understand. ](https://youtu.be/RrmdQUm4y4c?si=K4j5luqu0ZzJoOQm)
You'd better deport the homeowners because when demand falls and your house can no longer cover collateral on your credit line, there's going to be a lot of angry people.
Or the ones locked into a $300,000 mortgage for a house that's now worth $100,000.
Or the ones locked into a $300,000 mortgage for a house that's now worth $100,000.
They're called short sales. The banks take an imagined loss.
Walking away from a $300,000 mortgage is not going to ruin your life.
Walking away from a $300,000 mortgage is not going to ruin your life.
Housing prices are a hilarious thing for politicians to publicly bicker over, because either way they go, whoever is in power will take credit and whoever is not in power will blame. No consistency whatsoever.
If housing prices go up, it's "nobody can afford a home!" If housing prices go down, it's "property values are plummeting!". And the inverse claim for whoever is in power and wants you to think it's good.
There is no winning. Personally, high property values are gay. You may not be able to make money off of your primary residence, but rentals will still be profitable (just not via equity). You may end up underwater, but that just means you can't sell until you're paid up. Not a huge deal.
If housing prices go up, it's "nobody can afford a home!" If housing prices go down, it's "property values are plummeting!". And the inverse claim for whoever is in power and wants you to think it's good.
There is no winning. Personally, high property values are gay. You may not be able to make money off of your primary residence, but rentals will still be profitable (just not via equity). You may end up underwater, but that just means you can't sell until you're paid up. Not a huge deal.
Toast message
Asshole landlords are so much less of a problem when they have to personally live with their consequences right on their doorstep.
I don't want my tenants to be my neighbors so I never have privacy and I travel for work, and am frequently out of town for 100 nights a year. I'm providing you a rental, not maintaining the property personally. You can call me and I'll send a plumber.
Your suggestion is absurd.
Keep paying me rent, faggot.
Sure, it is better than being homeless, bit still.
There are levels of homeless, with caverns between. Living rent free in a tricked out camper van beats a $2400/mo goyshack any day of the week if you ask me. Unironically safer in some areas, too.
Tom Green Van Life - The Movie Part One https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbd3hpqKkCo
Strictly speaking, not having a home doesn't mean just not owning a shelter, it means not owning a *place* which the shelter occupies.
No physical slice of geography to call your own. As such, someone sleeping behind a dumpster in an alleyway, in their van in a Walmart parking lot, or in a secretly built cabin out in the woods on public land, are all equally under the banner of homeless.
Meanwhile the guy living in an uprooted manufactured home on a piece of undeveloped land in the middle of nowhere, and the one living in a six bedroom McMansion in the suburbs, are equally homeowners.
In both cases, the quality of life varies greatly, to the point where even the inferior category can supercede its inherent better.
I can rough it if i have to but i like modern luxuries.