You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
30
WeimerSolutions on scored.co
1 year ago30 points(+0/-0/+30Score on mirror)8 children
> Indistinguishable from progressives except that they hate immigrants
Shows how he had been deeply programmed into the duality of left-right, blue-red, progressive-conservative, democrat-republican paradigm which makes him think anyone without exactly the same worldview as his political party simply MUST be from the opposing political party.
When I experience the confusion in people as they assume that I am a liberal or a republican, I try to break it in the funniest way possible.
For right wingers who think Im a lefty, I tell them "No Trump is far left from me. Im Hitler."
For left wingers who think Im a republican, I tell them "No I am politically non binary."
1 year ago16 points(+0/-0/+16Score on mirror)2 children
That’s funny, but you should know it doesn’t work on the leftists.
They don’t use words to communicate abstract ideas. They use them to identify members of groups. When a leftist tells you they’re lgbt, they’re not telling you about what they do in the bedroom. They’re telling you they’re a leftist.
And if you make a joke that uses one of their words (specifically, using “non-binary”) they don’t parse the sentence and come to believe that you’re in both groups, they just identify you as “not in my group” - because members of their group don’t make that joke.
So basically, they’re going to lump you in with rightwingers anyway.
Note that this phenomenon (not using words to communicate ideas, but only to identify groups) is also why they’re constantly whining about “dog whistles”
It's funny how I used a term the often twist into a social identity group in a more grammatically correct way; but I dont say it like it's a joke **because it is not**. Worldviews, religions and traditions that shape our cultural values are far more complex than a single spectrum. So I do not identify with either of the mainstream paradigms of the modern age, just like how a homosexual may not identify with either gender, so we use the term "non-binary" (literally means "not two") to suggest that alternatives exist. I believe that openness to better political and economic systems is impossible without the awareness of them, and so making such suggestions is crucial to healing the deep subliminal programing that holds our people.
If said as a joke in the context of shit talking blacks and jews than yeah they are gonna lump you in with the far-right. But leftists are fortunately very easy to spot. When talking to someone about politics, let them speak first and you should be able to tell right away; and use words more carefully around those you assume would be more sensitive to them. And then, with anyone, left right or retarded, try to expand the common ground into their territory.
For example, if a leftist starts talking about how Trump is a tyrant, Id try to talk about government overreach during convid. Id say something like "I didnt take Trump's vax and now it's coming out how dangerous it was". Talk about how important it is to be liberal in the face of tyranny.
Another example, if a leftist talks about white privilege, Id try to sway the conversation to how "aid" from whites actually hurts the home countries of the **displaced** migrants.
These have both worked for me. I talk openly about my political views, even at work, and it is okay so long as I dont use harsh language around someone sensitive to it. One time someone asked me what I meant by "politically non binary", so I explained to him the psychology of imposed duality and how two vending machines next to each other results in more sales for both and that is why mcdonald's likes open across the street from burger king.
The whole idea is the break every white person I meet out of the matrix. Recognize that they are victims of brainwashing, but recognize that that brainwashing was just the repeated misuse of our language. I call it spellcraft, the magik the electric jew uses to control the minds of the masses; and it is simply them making up words and phrases like "far-right". Well, we must do a little bit of spellcraft of our own in order to reclaim our language and save our people.
I told an old Trump supporter wearing a MAGA hat and t-shirt, *"If he actually did what the left accuses him of, I'd be wearing your hat and shirt everywhere I went."*
The look of absolute confusion on that old man's face was hilarious. It ended the conversation full-stop. He simply could not discern what I meant.
Scaring them is a last resort. I try to help people come to reality on their own, but when it is clear that I cant get through to someone, it's always fun to pull out the hitler stuff.
Genius. My go-to when talking with leftists or MagaTards is Political Atheist. I always frame political thoughts into terms of secular religion and cult mechanics. I accuse them of being suckers for the REAL "Opiate Of The Masses", and that As A PoLiTiCAl AtHeIsT, I Am SimPly AbOve SuCh PetTy LaBeLs! And then mock them mercilessly for being mental niggers in need of a master and fat slobs in need of a superman to come to their rescue because they are so weak and pathetic.
Interesting because it implies that politics as a whole is a religion, which in the modern era it is (Noahidism). I like it a lot!
But it sounds like anarchism the way you describe it. This can reverse the outcome of your propaganda. Most people dismiss anarchists because they have no solutions to offer.
Perhaps this term could be improved to further stress the underlining religious hierarchy of politics and to disconnect it from any anarchistic implications. My original thought was "Politically Christian", but there is already a term for that, Christian Nationalist. Atheism is lawless and amoral because our values, morals and laws all come from our religions. So Political Atheist is a little too close to anarchy.
LoLz. Funny you say that, because that is EXACTLY where it comes from. I BELIEVE that all interactions should be voluntary between human beings, and that government is a a monopoly of force that violates that voluntary transaction.
However, I KNOW, that humans are surrounded by subhumans that can't govern themselves. Therefore, for humans to have FrEeDuMb, they must have an violent organization that protects them from the subhumans until a self governing society can be achieved. This organization must reflect our values. This can't be achieved without rulers, unfortunately. Anarchism doesn't provide for that.
It’s rare, but if someone ask me what my politics are, I tell them I’ve been pushed so far right that I fell of the flat earth. It usually gets a laugh.
Shows how he had been deeply programmed into the duality of left-right, blue-red, progressive-conservative, democrat-republican paradigm which makes him think anyone without exactly the same worldview as his political party simply MUST be from the opposing political party.
When I experience the confusion in people as they assume that I am a liberal or a republican, I try to break it in the funniest way possible.
For right wingers who think Im a lefty, I tell them "No Trump is far left from me. Im Hitler."
For left wingers who think Im a republican, I tell them "No I am politically non binary."
LOL.
They don’t use words to communicate abstract ideas. They use them to identify members of groups. When a leftist tells you they’re lgbt, they’re not telling you about what they do in the bedroom. They’re telling you they’re a leftist.
And if you make a joke that uses one of their words (specifically, using “non-binary”) they don’t parse the sentence and come to believe that you’re in both groups, they just identify you as “not in my group” - because members of their group don’t make that joke.
So basically, they’re going to lump you in with rightwingers anyway.
Note that this phenomenon (not using words to communicate ideas, but only to identify groups) is also why they’re constantly whining about “dog whistles”
It's funny how I used a term the often twist into a social identity group in a more grammatically correct way; but I dont say it like it's a joke **because it is not**. Worldviews, religions and traditions that shape our cultural values are far more complex than a single spectrum. So I do not identify with either of the mainstream paradigms of the modern age, just like how a homosexual may not identify with either gender, so we use the term "non-binary" (literally means "not two") to suggest that alternatives exist. I believe that openness to better political and economic systems is impossible without the awareness of them, and so making such suggestions is crucial to healing the deep subliminal programing that holds our people.
If said as a joke in the context of shit talking blacks and jews than yeah they are gonna lump you in with the far-right. But leftists are fortunately very easy to spot. When talking to someone about politics, let them speak first and you should be able to tell right away; and use words more carefully around those you assume would be more sensitive to them. And then, with anyone, left right or retarded, try to expand the common ground into their territory.
For example, if a leftist starts talking about how Trump is a tyrant, Id try to talk about government overreach during convid. Id say something like "I didnt take Trump's vax and now it's coming out how dangerous it was". Talk about how important it is to be liberal in the face of tyranny.
Another example, if a leftist talks about white privilege, Id try to sway the conversation to how "aid" from whites actually hurts the home countries of the **displaced** migrants.
These have both worked for me. I talk openly about my political views, even at work, and it is okay so long as I dont use harsh language around someone sensitive to it. One time someone asked me what I meant by "politically non binary", so I explained to him the psychology of imposed duality and how two vending machines next to each other results in more sales for both and that is why mcdonald's likes open across the street from burger king.
The whole idea is the break every white person I meet out of the matrix. Recognize that they are victims of brainwashing, but recognize that that brainwashing was just the repeated misuse of our language. I call it spellcraft, the magik the electric jew uses to control the minds of the masses; and it is simply them making up words and phrases like "far-right". Well, we must do a little bit of spellcraft of our own in order to reclaim our language and save our people.
Well damn, that's the most accurate description of myself that I've seen.
JK, we need to reclaim words and use our language properly in order to dispel the 🌈 brainrot
LOL my phone just made a 🌈 when I typed brainrot
The look of absolute confusion on that old man's face was hilarious. It ended the conversation full-stop. He simply could not discern what I meant.
Genius. My go-to when talking with leftists or MagaTards is Political Atheist. I always frame political thoughts into terms of secular religion and cult mechanics. I accuse them of being suckers for the REAL "Opiate Of The Masses", and that As A PoLiTiCAl AtHeIsT, I Am SimPly AbOve SuCh PetTy LaBeLs! And then mock them mercilessly for being mental niggers in need of a master and fat slobs in need of a superman to come to their rescue because they are so weak and pathetic.
Interesting because it implies that politics as a whole is a religion, which in the modern era it is (Noahidism). I like it a lot!
But it sounds like anarchism the way you describe it. This can reverse the outcome of your propaganda. Most people dismiss anarchists because they have no solutions to offer.
Perhaps this term could be improved to further stress the underlining religious hierarchy of politics and to disconnect it from any anarchistic implications. My original thought was "Politically Christian", but there is already a term for that, Christian Nationalist. Atheism is lawless and amoral because our values, morals and laws all come from our religions. So Political Atheist is a little too close to anarchy.
LoLz. Funny you say that, because that is EXACTLY where it comes from. I BELIEVE that all interactions should be voluntary between human beings, and that government is a a monopoly of force that violates that voluntary transaction.
However, I KNOW, that humans are surrounded by subhumans that can't govern themselves. Therefore, for humans to have FrEeDuMb, they must have an violent organization that protects them from the subhumans until a self governing society can be achieved. This organization must reflect our values. This can't be achieved without rulers, unfortunately. Anarchism doesn't provide for that.