1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
There are 3 opportunities for jewish fuckery at play here.
Option 1: They're making themselves an alternative to tiktok because they don't want to lose an audience to an app controlled by Chinese people who don't give a fuck. Instagram has been like this for a *while* now, actually.
Even with tiktok being banned in the near future, everyone knows that there are a million workarounds (india has already banned tiktok since a hot minute ago and it still has indian users. Though a majority of them gave up the app on their own volition because they loathe china) and also alternative chinese apps like xiaohongshu, which has a massively growing western userbase.
So they're trying to fill that niche themselves, because the Chinese ironically made unfiltered internet popular again. Once the Chinese competitors are gone, it will be draconian once again.
Option 2: alternatively, it's a honeypot designed to keep tabs on individuals. Facebook has an absolutely abysmal record of privacy that everyone is well aware of already. The jewish angle of this is to monitor and keep records on anyone who flies in the face of them.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
I can't wait for TikTok to be banned. You can say it's a "free speech" app or whatever the fuck. No it isn't. It's a time-waster brainrot app. Get rid of it.
It shows you content based on how you use it. If the content you see there appears to be time-waster brainrot, then that's on you, like when people complain there are too many under age girls dancing around in revealing outfits, it is merely the algorithm giving you crap you interact with.
It is an entirely different world if you use it for personal development, the brainrot drops significantly.
I don't know what kind of videos it would show me because I've never used it. I've watched other people use it though and it's painfully obvious that it's destroying their attention span. You can't get "personal development" from short-form videos.
I know Zuck takes a lot of flack for just blowing with the cultural winds of the moment.
But there is something I belief of a lot of these Silicon Valley tech founders. They have genuine meritocratic techno libertarian instincts, but they want to be apolitical and centrist, and just focus on technology and the product. But what happens if they naturally get surrounded by HR cunts and young leftists and the like as part of turning their startup into a big business. Then they are surrounded by hyper-leftist hyper-feminine totalitarian voices. This distorts their sense of what the "apolitical centrist position" looks like. They "mediate" their positions to the far left because from their perch, that's the center. But, freed from the illusory consensus built around them by subverters, they will take a truer centrist (and more right wing) position. Obviously, the cage of leftist Wormtongues around them will be furious, but fuck them.
Things like the Bud Light scandal and Trump winning the popular vote open their eyes and free them from that illusory leftist cage. This may be too optimistic, and I don't advocate for full forgiveness or trust of founders who belatedly make this kind of move, but I do think this may be what's happening with Zuck. This implies that this is at least somewhat genuine, and reflective of a powerful shift on the overton window, even if it doesn't mean Zuck is our new hero.
Yes, that's the other thing. Even if people like this are just crass opportunists reading the winds, it's a good sign that the winds are blowing that way at all, and them bending this way is good for us.