> What is often ignored is that the jewish success, the actual one, comes not primarily thanks to hard work and individual merit but from deliberate, calculated in-group collectivism.
More than that. They inhabit work that is not productive in any shape or form, but actively causes harm to others, but gives them a lot of money. It is unethical, backed with government power (enforcement & jurisdiction), and let's not forget how the very financial system is corrupted to its root. All they need is to recruit jews who ALSO have no problems with exploiting the population and never talk about it publicly.
> And, while leaving that aspect out, what they do is to tell others to abandon collective approach as muh collectivism. That's the game they played.
Yes. But the truth is, what jews do should not be possible, regardless of their nepotism. What should happen in our countries isn't nepotism, aka the imitation of jews, but a rejection of all foreigners, rejection of unethical practices, and pure racial in-group preference (if for some reason we won't get rid of niggers and kikes). "Racial nepotism" should be the standard, even more so - ONLY that should happen.
> Nope. Rejected. I would rather take a right wing definition from Wrangel, Julius Evola or Francis Parker Yockey.
I do not favor labels. I just want maximum freedom with no kikes and niggers. Shared cultural elements and events are very welcome.
More than that. They inhabit work that is not productive in any shape or form, but actively causes harm to others, but gives them a lot of money. It is unethical, backed with government power (enforcement & jurisdiction), and let's not forget how the very financial system is corrupted to its root. All they need is to recruit jews who ALSO have no problems with exploiting the population and never talk about it publicly.
> And, while leaving that aspect out, what they do is to tell others to abandon collective approach as muh collectivism. That's the game they played.
Yes. But the truth is, what jews do should not be possible, regardless of their nepotism. What should happen in our countries isn't nepotism, aka the imitation of jews, but a rejection of all foreigners, rejection of unethical practices, and pure racial in-group preference (if for some reason we won't get rid of niggers and kikes). "Racial nepotism" should be the standard, even more so - ONLY that should happen.
> Nope. Rejected. I would rather take a right wing definition from Wrangel, Julius Evola or Francis Parker Yockey.
I do not favor labels. I just want maximum freedom with no kikes and niggers. Shared cultural elements and events are very welcome.
1. Every man stakes a claim to a piece of ground. He sinks or swims by how well he can manage that land, using whatever tools he can.
2. Lazy men get nothing. If you slack in caring for your own land, no one is going to help them.
3. When problems arise, people work together to solve them. For instance, if food is short in the winter, people share food with each other. If Farmer Bob gets injured, his neighbors pick up the slack while he heals.
4. Everyone is expected to learn everything about everything. Farmers are expected to read books and try out new things. Their free time is spent tinkering and building and experimenting.
5. Money isn't the object. It's just a tool. Money comes and goes. When you get money, you settle your debts, maybe save a little for the future, but you are expected to spend it. No one likes a guy who hoards cash or who doesn't spend the money he earns in the local community. Money can't solve most problems. Money doesn't even help with most problems.
6. Family is everything. Raising your kids right and setting them on the right path is paramount. A kid isn't grown until he has his own land with his own wife and kids.
7. Religion is terribly important. Remember, the West was settled by the mormons and the Western US culture is mormon culture.
Nothing in there about free trade or investments or banks or interest rates or anything like that. Just get a piece of land and work yourself to the bone trying to make it feed your family and then some.
That's the economic policy Americans want.
Two options, either Warhammer 40K and HP Lovecraft only began to grasp at some of the truths, what some of the mysteries would actually be.
That or the matter of how the world today fair compared to the intricacies of an actual heaven, hell/hades and purgatory? The latters would likely be more complicated rather than less.
"A kid isn't grown until he has his own land with his own wife and kids."
But contrary to the short-sighted conceits of "classical liberalism", the buck should not have ended there. Far from it. There were reasons cavemen and forest dwellers had shamans, tribe elders and ancient Greeks had their tales of heroes and leaders. Why the Romans had their Caesar and Augustus and Aurelian while the Germans had Bismarck and Hitler.
Such a need only went out in appearance, due to the illusions of the good times and deliberate lies to mislead people into future ruin, but grew and grew over time with greater numbers, greater territory, more complex societies, histories and economies. And the supply has never historically been fully up the demand on this matter. Another thing the free market does not care to magically fix.
Religion has to be up to the task as well, otherwise it will only stumble and fail. Which means it has to be significantly different from what has been and what we have today.