Here's my understanding, put short.
It must be taken into account that these brands of politics were astro-turfed into existence by the deep state, by JOG regime agencies to deceive, mislead the right/center away from properly understanding and opposing it's true social policies objectives.
To do what it is supposed to, the controlled opposition must not just have lackeys but have ideologies that more or less backs their controlled opposition ways.
Especially since it has been around, been widespread for a while now. While it's nice to argue the details as to why X and Y lies are wrong, the bigger picture is that the glowie agencies knows how to manipulate and for what ends. They have been doing this for generations.
Regardless if the duped realizes it or not, what they believe is what the enemy wants them to believe. The ideology they have been taught to believe is designed serves the enemy.
----
We sees this clearly demonstrated with Trump and this can be useful to point out. When Trump have his successes, it's clearly when he moves away from that mold. When he have his own ideas instead of blindly following the boomercon hivemind. He would have been completely irrelevant and washed out by April 2016 if he had given in to it completely.
----
Look at many of those spearheaded the "Austrian school of economics". It's not simply a matter of pointing out that they are jewish.
What is often ignored is that the jewish success, the actual one, comes not primarily thanks to hard work and individual merit but from deliberate, calculated in-group collectivism.
Ethnic nepotism and discrimination going back centuries. Practices that maybe even stretch back when the Western Roman Empire was still around. Pretty well culturally ingrained should notions of cognitive racial differences is too edgy for you or your audience.
They benefitted from that collectivism but more so, **them promoting these ideas is a collective in-group effort.** Not separate individuals that juuust happened to come to similar conclusion that also juuuust happened to also be jewish. And, while leaving that aspect out, what they do is to tell others to abandon collective approach as muh collectivism. That's the game they played.
And their believers, their dupes pretends to define what is right-wing. Their definition of socialism might as well apply to Qing Chin, the 1911 Russian, German and Chinese Empires. While, of course, ignoring the gun control and censorship of the (weimar) republic era. Or Martin Luther King's politics.
Nope. Rejected. I would rather take a right wing definition from Wrangel, Julius Evola or Francis Parker Yockey.
More than that. They inhabit work that is not productive in any shape or form, but actively causes harm to others, but gives them a lot of money. It is unethical, backed with government power (enforcement & jurisdiction), and let's not forget how the very financial system is corrupted to its root. All they need is to recruit jews who ALSO have no problems with exploiting the population and never talk about it publicly.
> And, while leaving that aspect out, what they do is to tell others to abandon collective approach as muh collectivism. That's the game they played.
Yes. But the truth is, what jews do should not be possible, regardless of their nepotism. What should happen in our countries isn't nepotism, aka the imitation of jews, but a rejection of all foreigners, rejection of unethical practices, and pure racial in-group preference (if for some reason we won't get rid of niggers and kikes). "Racial nepotism" should be the standard, even more so - ONLY that should happen.
> Nope. Rejected. I would rather take a right wing definition from Wrangel, Julius Evola or Francis Parker Yockey.
I do not favor labels. I just want maximum freedom with no kikes and niggers. Shared cultural elements and events are very welcome.