Here's my understanding, put short.
It must be taken into account that these brands of politics were astro-turfed into existence by the deep state, by JOG regime agencies to deceive, mislead the right/center away from properly understanding and opposing it's true social policies objectives.
To do what it is supposed to, the controlled opposition must not just have lackeys but have ideologies that more or less backs their controlled opposition ways.
Especially since it has been around, been widespread for a while now. While it's nice to argue the details as to why X and Y lies are wrong, the bigger picture is that the glowie agencies knows how to manipulate and for what ends. They have been doing this for generations.
Regardless if the duped realizes it or not, what they believe is what the enemy wants them to believe. The ideology they have been taught to believe is designed serves the enemy.
----
We sees this clearly demonstrated with Trump and this can be useful to point out. When Trump have his successes, it's clearly when he moves away from that mold. When he have his own ideas instead of blindly following the boomercon hivemind. He would have been completely irrelevant and washed out by April 2016 if he had given in to it completely.
----
Look at many of those spearheaded the "Austrian school of economics". It's not simply a matter of pointing out that they are jewish.
What is often ignored is that the jewish success, the actual one, comes not primarily thanks to hard work and individual merit but from deliberate, calculated in-group collectivism.
Ethnic nepotism and discrimination going back centuries. Practices that maybe even stretch back when the Western Roman Empire was still around. Pretty well culturally ingrained should notions of cognitive racial differences is too edgy for you or your audience.
They benefitted from that collectivism but more so, **them promoting these ideas is a collective in-group effort.** Not separate individuals that juuust happened to come to similar conclusion that also juuuust happened to also be jewish. And, while leaving that aspect out, what they do is to tell others to abandon collective approach as muh collectivism. That's the game they played.
And their believers, their dupes pretends to define what is right-wing. Their definition of socialism might as well apply to Qing Chin, the 1911 Russian, German and Chinese Empires. While, of course, ignoring the gun control and censorship of the (weimar) republic era. Or Martin Luther King's politics.
Nope. Rejected. I would rather take a right wing definition from Wrangel, Julius Evola or Francis Parker Yockey.
1. Every man stakes a claim to a piece of ground. He sinks or swims by how well he can manage that land, using whatever tools he can.
2. Lazy men get nothing. If you slack in caring for your own land, no one is going to help them.
3. When problems arise, people work together to solve them. For instance, if food is short in the winter, people share food with each other. If Farmer Bob gets injured, his neighbors pick up the slack while he heals.
4. Everyone is expected to learn everything about everything. Farmers are expected to read books and try out new things. Their free time is spent tinkering and building and experimenting.
5. Money isn't the object. It's just a tool. Money comes and goes. When you get money, you settle your debts, maybe save a little for the future, but you are expected to spend it. No one likes a guy who hoards cash or who doesn't spend the money he earns in the local community. Money can't solve most problems. Money doesn't even help with most problems.
6. Family is everything. Raising your kids right and setting them on the right path is paramount. A kid isn't grown until he has his own land with his own wife and kids.
7. Religion is terribly important. Remember, the West was settled by the mormons and the Western US culture is mormon culture.
Nothing in there about free trade or investments or banks or interest rates or anything like that. Just get a piece of land and work yourself to the bone trying to make it feed your family and then some.
That's the economic policy Americans want.
Two options, either Warhammer 40K and HP Lovecraft only began to grasp at some of the truths, what some of the mysteries would actually be.
That or the matter of how the world today fair compared to the intricacies of an actual heaven, hell/hades and purgatory? The latters would likely be more complicated rather than less.
"A kid isn't grown until he has his own land with his own wife and kids."
But contrary to the short-sighted conceits of "classical liberalism", the buck should not have ended there. Far from it. There were reasons cavemen and forest dwellers had shamans, tribe elders and ancient Greeks had their tales of heroes and leaders. Why the Romans had their Caesar and Augustus and Aurelian while the Germans had Bismarck and Hitler.
Such a need only went out in appearance, due to the illusions of the good times and deliberate lies to mislead people into future ruin, but grew and grew over time with greater numbers, greater territory, more complex societies, histories and economies. And the supply has never historically been fully up the demand on this matter. Another thing the free market does not care to magically fix.
Religion has to be up to the task as well, otherwise it will only stumble and fail. Which means it has to be significantly different from what has been and what we have today.