New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
31
Insurances dropped fire coverage months before LA fires (files.catbox.moe)
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
17 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
HEXEN on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Fire bunkers could work. I know the soil in CA isn't great for basements, but you could still probably build one.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Also just building out of materials that are less flammable. Or coating materials with some kind of fire retardant that isn't too toxic. I'm thinking that there are ingenious ways to construct homes and buildings in areas with fire hazards, but codes and regulations and permits and government intervention prevents innovation and new ideas.

Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Adobe
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
HEXEN on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> I'm thinking that there are ingenious ways to construct homes and buildings in areas with fire hazards

Simple clay plaster with additives has been used for centuries. It's not 100% protection, but it's cheap and will hold up to small scale stuff. A burning ember won't catch your entire house on fire, for example.

Alternatively, like you mentioned, coatings can be applied and you can use chemical processes to impregnate wood to increase its fire resistant capability. But under intense heat and sustained burns, these things will fail/melt away.

I want to build my entire house out of rubberized concrete and rebar into the side of a hill.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message