1 year ago28 points(+0/-0/+28Score on mirror)4 children
What race is it supposed to be insulting? I can’t even tell, CalArts is such shit. Isn’t it a “transphobic” character instead? Or am I racist for thinking that whatever mystery meat “race” this is representing *looks* like a tranny?
Obviously a wetback anchor baby. The unibrow, the gap tooth, the Dora the Explorer clothes, the receding nappy hair barely held back by a single hair tie. This is a wild child and would be happier swinging from a banana tree back home, but mama and papacito want her to experience a life of housecleaning and bussing the tables at a Chinese restaurant right here in America.
They keep raising the concern even though it seems absurd. It's supposed to be liberatory. We make art that's brown, ugly, and evil just in case the human right to ugliness is being inhibited by the presence of too much beauty. Human rights are _sacred_. Broken, ugly humans are just a cartoon.
no, son. this is USA now. this an accurate and emotionally-acceptable representation of the average USA person now.
your sensibilities and HUEEEWHITE aesthetics are 50 years out of date. you're going to die soon and your children and your children's children will be the asshole sex slaves of muslim and 4ft tall mexican gangbangers.
For the “art style” they’re going for, this actually looks like many kids you’ll run across at your local Walmart throughout the country. It’s not even a joke. I mean, it is, but to Gods sensibilities.