1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
> Treasury ministers said they had "reasonable grounds to suspect" Blood and Honour of being involved in "terrorist activities through promoting and encouraging terrorism, seeking to recruit people for that purpose and making funds available for the purposes of its terrorist activities".
Sorry, are we still talking about White Britons? Not the shitskins you're importing? Huh?
1 year ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)1 child
Of course they're white, ~~otherwise the accused crime would be more specific and egregious than to "encourage" and "recruit".~~ they had funds available.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
I spent more than 10 years trying to refute antisemitism and defend the innocent jews as a hobby--because I thought it was baseless racism against a mostly harmless people.
Turns out it was based all along. I still disagree with the idea of "I hate all X because some X are bad", but we've Named The Jew enough to see that the stereotype is honestly deserved.
It's possible they still might be able to. Either they still have possession of the funds OR their bank is ordered to hold them?
> When an asset freeze is applied, the funds or economic resources are frozen immediately by the person in possession or control of them. Imposing an asset freeze does not change the ownership of the frozen funds or economic resource and nor are they transferred to HM Treasury for safekeeping.
Sorry, are we still talking about White Britons? Not the shitskins you're importing? Huh?
AKA existing while white.
Turns out it was based all along. I still disagree with the idea of "I hate all X because some X are bad", but we've Named The Jew enough to see that the stereotype is honestly deserved.