New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Do you have free will? No. Have you ever decided to decide something? Our "will" comes from an unobservable place.

But the real question, are we deterministic superdominoes six billion (or however many) years old? ALSO NO. You have four leverage points as a consciousness piloting a meat mecha.

>Free won't

Have you ever been in a situation where your mind thought of a joke and you said to yourself, "This is not the time"? That's a function of your prefrontal cortex, and I call it "free won't". Your uncontrollable will makes suggestions all the time but you can turn them down. You have veto power in the moment... unless you've had too much to drink, or were born a nigger. This is all you have when you're "on the spot" in the moment.

>Free speech

The words you choose, especially the less common ones, have a neurolinguistic feedback principle at work. Word choice affects the emotional qualities of present and retold experiences. Using the power of free won't, you can catch yourself phrasing things poorly, stop yourself, and rephrase them to be more in tune with your desired state of consciousness. I used to speak aloud the new phrasing, counting five repetitions with my fingers.

>Free association

This is intentional use of Pavlovian responses. You can reward yourself for finishing a run, or put on cologne for sexy times with the missus (and later, apply it when you want her to be horny), or you can meditate on a feeling while your hand makes a peculiar shape, or whatever. It's abusing heuristic association like a built-in cheat code. It works on others, and training your self is no different from training an other.

>Free mind

Your brain knows that whatever you've been doing (whether happy or sad) has kept you alive so far. So by default, it seeks out "more of the same". Angry people subconsciously seek out situations that anger them, and reasons to be angry in neutral situations. You can watch this effect in real time on the highway. So how do we change what our brain is autoseeking? Well you can't change "more of", so you have to change "the same". What you want is more of a different same.

Thing is, your brain can't really tell the difference between real past experience and virtual (imagined) past experience, and there's no difference emotionally - there are no "virtual feelings" in daydreams. Your behavior in daydreams becomes part of your reference pool for habitual situations and actions. Daydreaming daily about certain kinds of situations and your kinds of responses to those situations will help reprogram your "uncontrollable" will and your subconscious attraction to certain situations.

They did an old study where participants were tested on their basketball free throw abilities. Then the participants were split in three groups. One group did nothing. Another went to a hoop and shot 20 free throws a day. The final group sat in a comfy chair and imagined shooting 20 free throws a day. A month later they were tested again. Who improved most?

Obviously, the people who sat in a comfy chair and preloaded extra memories of successful free throws. It wasn't even close. This is the mundane side of "the law of attraction".

There's a whole extra thing for those who've unlocked their spiritual oddness, this is just the materialistic side. I'm not going to sit here and explain how consciousness can pre-observe future phenomena and collapse the superposition of possibility into definable and experiencable forms; I already did my effortpoast today.
If you’re wondering why America deals with Hispanics and their entitlement regarding immigration, it’s because they have Jewish DNA.

https://archive.is/axT1E

This isn’t a completely different race behaving like Jews. It’s quite literally Jews acting like Jews. Once again, the conclusion is: Usual suspects.

With this knowledge we are witnessing a call to mass deport Jews from a country, bringing the number to 110 if carried out. The natives simply could not stand the Jew.
Looking through my old Math Blaster CDs, I found a hidden interview where the female founder, a retired math teacher, thought the 'newly proposed' methods of teaching math were doomed to fail, and decided to try creating what would be the first educational arcade game in 1986. Of course, her approach of gamification was wildly successful, but she had a document where she cites the sources behind her reasoning, which I had to dig into.

-------------

Apparently, math used to be taught by rote (e.g. learning your times tables), but with the calculator becoming affordable, math curriculum shifted to teaching concepts rather than memorization. Naturally, this caused a widening disparity between White Males and Females, and an even larger disparity between Whites and Nonwhites. This would normally be considered just a fact of life, except...

Economic thinktanks were creaming themselves over women entering the workforce. For those who don't know, thinktanks reports are how the jewish architects pass the design specifications of the economy on to the engineers that implement the changes. The biggest one of the time was Workforce 2000 [link here](https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED290887.pdf), known for such lovely quotes as "White Males, thought of only a generation ago as the mainstays of the economy, will comprise only 15% of the net additions to the labor force between 1985 and 2000."

Since the demographics section of Workforce 2000 claimed that the economy of 2000 would be majority nonwhite or female, nonwhite and Female underperformance in Math was considered a 'National Debt' and of 'greatest concern' in other reports focused on curriculum. The biggest of these was 'Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education' [link here](https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/1199/chapter/1).

The report argues that, since women and nonwhites are the future of the nation according to Workforce 2000 (they actually cite Workforce 2000 for this), that their under-performance is worth remediating at any cost.

The most hilarious thing about this is that women and nonwhite performance had already decreased because of other changes - the proliferation of the calculator was used to justify a shift from rote memorization of the basics to attempting to teach number theory and relationships, which are far more abstract as concept, and thus pushed those demographics further behind.

Some other fun quotes from the report:

* Since 1970, the number of Ph.D. degrees in the mathematical sciences earned by U.S. citizens has declined by nearly 50 pecent. The majority of new Ph.D. degrees awarded in U.S. universities now go to foreign citizens."
* "The performance of the top 5% of U.S. students is matched by the top 50% of students in Japan. Our very best students--the top 1%--scored lowest in the top 1% of all participating countries."

Read Gatto if you are curious more about how these changes were actually implemented.
posted 1 year ago by steele2 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
How Many (www.instagram.com)
posted 1 year ago by USSDefiantJazz on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
62
posted 1 year ago by MickHigan2 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +62Score on mirror )
16
posted 1 year ago by BlackPillBot on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +16Score on mirror )
36
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
36
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
76
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +76Score on mirror )
76
Weaponized (pomf2.lain.la)
posted 1 year ago by GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +76Score on mirror )
39
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +39Score on mirror )
38
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +38Score on mirror )
24
posted 1 year ago by Conspirologist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +24Score on mirror )
13
posted 1 year ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror )
100
posted 1 year ago by diogenesofthearch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +100Score on mirror )
48
A frenly wiki (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by WitchHunterSiegfried on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +48Score on mirror )
85
Get in faggots (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +85Score on mirror )
61
Normal (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by MLJFireDragon747 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +61Score on mirror )
Toast message