New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1 year ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
> flat earth I’m still an agnostic
 
I feel like the arguments lean round earth but I want it to be flat for some reason. There are some clear uses of deception like with the picture of the earth that was a "composite" rather than actual picture. Which makes us wonder why that was faked. But probably it was just to siphon off tax monies by presenting grander space achievements than are real to get more funding.
None
1 year ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes, well put. I have no doubt that NASA is a deception, and there are so many aspect of the globe theory that seem to be untrue. I haven’t yet been able to find a convincing cosmology consistent with flat or dome earth but as I say I haven’t made it my main focus yet.
I think what makes me lean somewhat towards the non-globe theory is the vicious attacks and demands for an end to debate from the globers.
None
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
/u/doginventer /u/sparrow
 
I don't know if this applies to either of your thought processes but as a "round earther", I'd like to present this event: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_Neptune
 
Neptune was discovered only after it's location was mathematically estimated with gravimetric equations.
 
Uranus was discovered in the same way right before. These equations do not work with a flat earth model
None
Toast message